Literature DB >> 31279355

New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring.

Thomas W L Scheeren1, Michael A E Ramsay2.   

Abstract

Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic interventions such as volume expansion or vasoactive medications. Recent developments include the move from static to dynamic variables to assess conditions such as cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness and the transition to less-invasive or even noninvasive monitoring techniques, at least in the perioperative setting. This review describes the available techniques that currently are being used in the care of the cardiovascular patient and discusses their strengths and limitations. Even though the thermodilution method remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output (CO), the use of the pulmonary artery catheter has declined over the last decades, even in the setting of cardiovascular anesthesia. The transpulmonary thermodilution method, in addition to accurately measuring CO, provides the user with some additional helpful variables, of which extravascular lung water is probably the most interesting. Less-invasive monitoring techniques use, for example, pulse contour analysis to originate flow-derived variables such as stroke volume and CO from the arterial pressure signal, or they may measure the velocity-time integral in the descending aorta to estimate the stroke volume, using, for example, the esophageal Doppler. Completely noninvasive methods such as the volume clamp method use finger cuffs to reconstruct the arterial pressure waveform, from which stroke volume and CO are calculated. All of these less-invasive CO monitoring devices have percentage errors around 40% compared with reference methods (thermodilution), meaning that the values are not interchangeable.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac output; cardiovascular dynamics; fluid responsiveness; hemodynamic monitoring; measurement techniques; predictive analytics; preload

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279355     DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth        ISSN: 1053-0770            Impact factor:   2.628


  5 in total

1.  Letter to the editor related to the article: "Maternal hemodynamics and computerized cardiotocography during labor with epidural analgesia." published by Giannubilo et al.

Authors:  Christian Compagnone; Alberto Calabrese; Giovanni Trombi; Valentina Bellini; Elena Bignami
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Accuracy of a multiparametric score based on pulse wave analysis for prediction of fluid responsiveness: ancillary analysis of an observational study.

Authors:  Arthur Neuschwander; Romain Barthélémy; David Ditchi; Fatou Dramé; Maximilien Redouté; Jules Stern; Bernard Cholley; Alexandre Mebazaa; Benjamin Glenn Chousterman; Romain Pirracchio
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Wireless, non-invasive, wearable device for continuous remote monitoring of hemodynamic parameters in a swine model of controlled hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Dean Nachman; Keren Constantini; Gal Poris; Linn Wagnert-Avraham; S David Gertz; Romi Littman; Eli Kabakov; Arik Eisenkraft; Yftach Gepner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Comparing Cardiac Output Measurements Using a Wearable, Wireless, Noninvasive Photoplethysmography-Based Device to Pulse Contour Cardiac Output in the General ICU: A Brief Report.

Authors:  Ayana Dvir; Nir Goldstein; Avigal Rapoport; Ronen Gingy Balmor; Dean Nachman; Roei Merin; Meir Fons; Arik Ben Ishay; Arik Eisenkraft
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Perioperative non-invasive versus semi-invasive cardiac index monitoring in patients with bariatric surgery - a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Ulf Lorenzen; Markus Pohlmann; Jonathan Hansen; Phil Klose; Matthias Gruenewald; Jochen Renner; Gunnar Elke
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.