Literature DB >> 31279095

Effects of body mass on microstructural features of the osteochondral unit: A comparative analysis of 37 mammalian species.

I A D Mancini1, L Rieppo2, B Pouran3, I O Afara4, F M Serra Braganca5, M H P van Rijen6, M Kik7, H Weinans3, J Toyras8, P R van Weeren1, J Malda9.   

Abstract

Since Galileo's days the effect of size on the anatomical characteristics of the structural elements of the body has been a subject of interest. However, the effects of scaling at tissue level have received little interest and virtually no data exist on the subject with respect to the osteochondral unit in the joint, despite this being one of the most lesion-prone and clinically relevant parts of the musculoskeletal system. Imaging techniques, including Fourier transform infrared imaging, polarized light microscopy and micro computed tomography, were combined to study the response to increasing body mass of the osteochondral unit. We analyzed the effect of scaling on structural characteristics of articular cartilage, subchondral plate and the supporting trabecular bone, across a wide range of mammals at microscopic level. We demonstrated that, while total cartilage thickness scales to body mass in a negative allometric fashion, thickness of different cartilage layers did not. Cartilage tissue layers were found to adapt to increasing loads principally in the deep zone with the superficial layers becoming relatively thinner. Subchondral plate thickness was found to have no correlation to body mass, nor did bone volume fraction. The underlying trabecular bone was found to have thicker trabeculae (r=0.75, p<0.001), as expected since this structure carries most loads and plays a role in force mitigation. The results of this study suggest that the osteochondral tissue structure has remained remarkably preserved across mammalian species during evolution, and that in particular, the trabecular bone carries the adaptation to the increasing body mass.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cartilage; Osteochondral comparative analysis; Osteochondral unit; Scaling; Subchondral bone; Trabecular bone

Year:  2019        PMID: 31279095     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  3 in total

1.  A high-resolution cross-species comparative analysis of the subchondral bone provides insight into critical topographical patterns of the osteochondral unit.

Authors:  Jana Christin Michaelis; Tamás Oláh; Steffen Schrenker; Magali Cucchiarini; Henning Madry
Journal:  Clin Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

2.  Vertical clinging and leaping induced evolutionary rate shifts in postcranial evolution of tamarins and marmosets (Primates, Callitrichidae).

Authors:  Léo Botton-Divet; John A Nyakatura
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25

3.  Melt electrowriting onto anatomically relevant biodegradable substrates: Resurfacing a diarthrodial joint.

Authors:  Quentin C Peiffer; Mylène de Ruijter; Joost van Duijn; Denis Crottet; Ernst Dominic; Jos Malda; Miguel Castilho
Journal:  Mater Des       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 7.991

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.