Literature DB >> 31278465

Comparative metabolite profiling of two switchgrass ecotypes reveals differences in drought stress responses and rhizosheath weight.

Tie-Yuan Liu1,2, Mo-Xian Chen2,3, Youjun Zhang4,5, Fu-Yuan Zhu6, Ying-Gao Liu7, Yuan Tian3, Alisdair R Fernie5, Nenghui Ye8, Jianhua Zhang9,10.   

Abstract

MAIN
CONCLUSION: Rhizosheath comprises soil that adheres firmly to roots. In this study, two ecotypes of switchgrass with different rhizosheath sizes after drought stress were analyzed which showed metabolic differences under drought conditions. The rhizosheath comprises soil that adheres firmly to roots by a combination of root hairs and mucilage and may aid in root growth under soil drying. The aim of this work is to reveal the potential metabolites involved in rhizosheath formation under drought stress conditions. Panicum virgatum L. (switchgrass), which belongs to the Poaceae family, is an important biofuel and fodder crop in drought areas. Five switchgrass ecotypes (cv. Alamo, cv. Blackwake, cv. Summer, cv. Cave-in-Rock and cv. Kanlow) have a broad range of rhizosheath weight under drought conditions. For two selected ecotypes with contrast rhizosheath weight (cv. Alamo and cv. Kanlow), root hair length and density, lateral root number, root morphological parameters were measured, and real-time qRT-PCR was performed. Gas chromatography mass spectrophotometry (GC-MS) was used to determine the primary metabolites in the shoots and roots of selected ecotypes under drought stress conditions. The change trends of root hair length and density, lateral root number and related gene expression were consistent with rhizosheath weight in Alamo and Kanlow under drought and watered conditions. For root morphological parameters, Alamo grew deeper than Kanlow, while Kanlow exhibited higher values for other parameters. In this study, the levels of amino acids, sugars and organic acids were significantly changed in response to drought stress in two switchgrass ecotypes. Several metabolites including amino acids (arginine, isoleucine, methionine and cysteine) and sugars (kestose, raffinose, fructose, fucose, sorbose and xylose) in the large soil-sheathed roots of Alamo and Kanlow were significantly increased compared to small or no soil-sheathed roots of Alamo and Kanlow. Difference in rhizosheath size is reflected in the plant internal metabolites under drought stress conditions. Additionally, our results highlight the importance of using metabolite profiling and provide a better understanding of rhizosheath formation at the cellular level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Metabolite profiling; Panicum virgatum L.; Rhizosheath; Root growth; Water stress

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31278465     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03228-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  48 in total

1.  Metabolic profiling allows comprehensive phenotyping of genetically or environmentally modified plant systems.

Authors:  U Roessner; A Luedemann; D Brust; O Fiehn; T Linke; L Willmitzer; A Fernie
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Metabolomics--the link between genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 3.  Enzymes and other agents that enhance cell wall extensibility.

Authors:  D J Cosgrove
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1999

4.  The Extraction and Assay of 1-Kestose:Sucrose Fructosyl Transferase from Leaves of Wheat.

Authors:  C. J. Pollock; T. L. Housley
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  How Do Real Roots Work? (Some New Views of Root Structure).

Authors:  M. McCully
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Rhizosheath of sinai desert plants is a potential repository for associative diazotrophs.

Authors:  Amal A Othman; Wafaa M Amer; M Fayez; N A Hegazi
Journal:  Microbiol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.415

7.  GMD@CSB.DB: the Golm Metabolome Database.

Authors:  Joachim Kopka; Nicolas Schauer; Stephan Krueger; Claudia Birkemeyer; Björn Usadel; Eveline Bergmüller; Peter Dörmann; Wolfram Weckwerth; Yves Gibon; Mark Stitt; Lothar Willmitzer; Alisdair R Fernie; Dirk Steinhauser
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 8.  Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations.

Authors:  Basia Vinocur; Arie Altman
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.740

9.  Plant growth promotion abilities and microscale bacterial dynamics in the rhizosphere of Lupin analysed by phytate utilization ability.

Authors:  Yusuke Unno; Kenzo Okubo; Jun Wasaki; Takuro Shinano; Mitsuru Osaki
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Formation and Stabilization of Rhizosheaths of Zea mays L. (Effect of Soil Water Content).

Authors:  M. Watt; M. E. McCully; M. J. Canny
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  3 in total

1.  Coordination of root auxin with the fungus Piriformospora indica and bacterium Bacillus cereus enhances rice rhizosheath formation under soil drying.

Authors:  Feiyun Xu; Hanpeng Liao; Yingjiao Zhang; Minjie Yao; Jianping Liu; Leyun Sun; Xue Zhang; Jinyong Yang; Ke Wang; Xiaoyun Wang; Yexin Ding; Chen Liu; Christopher Rensing; Jianhua Zhang; Kaiwun Yeh; Weifeng Xu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Spermine-mediated metabolic homeostasis improves growth and stress tolerance in creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) under water or high-temperature stress.

Authors:  Zhou Li; Bizhen Cheng; Xing Wu; Yan Zhang; Guangyan Feng; Yan Peng
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Rhizosheath: An adaptive root trait to improve plant tolerance to phosphorus and water deficits?

Authors:  Mehtab Muhammad Aslam; Joseph K Karanja; Ian C Dodd; Muhammad Waseem; Xu Weifeng
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.947

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.