Literature DB >> 31278323

Improved surface passivation and reduced parasitic absorption in PEDOT:PSS/c-Si heterojunction solar cells through the admixture of sorbitol.

Marc-Uwe Halbich1,2, Dimitri Zielke3, Ralf Gogolin3, Rüdiger Sauer-Stieglitz4, Wilfried Lövenich4, Jan Schmidt3,5.   

Abstract

We examine the impact of class="Chemical">sorbitol admixture to the hole-conduction class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">polymer PEDOT:PSS [poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate)] on the characteristics of PEDOT:PSS/crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells. We fabricate solar cells where the PEDOT:PSS layer is deposited as a hole-collecting contact at the cell rear, whereas the electron-collecting front is conventionally processed by means of phosphorus diffusion. Surprisingly, we observe that the admixture of the infrared-transparent sorbitol not only improves the short-circuit density of the solar cells due to the reduction of the infrared parasitic absorption, but also improves the passivation quality of PEDOT:PSS on silicon and hence the open-circuit voltage of the solar cells. The series resistance is not influenced by the admixture of sorbitol up to 4.0 wt.% sorbitol admixture in the PEDOT:PSS dispersion, but shows a pronounced increase for larger sorbitol contents. The optimal sorbitol content concerning efficiency is hence 4.0 wt.%, leading to an energy conversion efficiency of 20.4% at one sun, which is more than 1% absolute higher compared to the efficiency of the reference cells without sorbitol.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31278323      PMCID: PMC6611827          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46280-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Heterojunction solar cells combining the hole-conducting class="Chemical">polymer class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) [PEDOT:PSS] and c-Si have demonstrated their high-efficiency potential in previous studies[1-9]. In the first fabricated PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells, the organic layer was deposited to the front, leading to relatively low short-circuit current densities Jsc due to the parasitic absorption losses within the PEDOT:PSS. Moving the organic layer to the rear in the so-called ‘BackPEDOT’ cell concept[10] resulted in significantly improved Jsc and led for the first time to efficiencies exceeding 20%[11,12]. Still it turned out that even for the BackPEDOT cell, Jsc is limited by parasitic free-carrier absorption within the PEDOT:PSS layer of infrared photons reaching the cell rear[10]. In the present study, we examine a promising and easy-to-implement approach to reduce the parasitic absorption in BackPEDOT cells by increasing the transparency of the PEDOT:PSS layer by adding sorbitol to the precursor dispersion. In a previous study[13], we showed that sorbitol significantly increases the transparency of the PEDOT:PSS layer in the infrared and thus sorbitol can be used for effectively reducing the parasitic absorption in the PEDOT:PSS layer. Sorbitol is already established as a conductivity additive in PEDOT:PSS[14,15]. In this work, we fabricate solar cells to examine the impact of the sorbitol admixture on device level. In addition, we also examine the impact on surface passivation on lifetime samples. Our experimental results clearly show that the sorbitol admixture does not only positively affect the Jsc of the cells, but due to an improved surface passivation, shows also a positive impact on the open-circuit voltage Voc. Hence, the addition of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS dispersion has multiple advantages for PEDOT:PSS/c-Si heterojunction cells.

Experimental Details

Lifetime sample preparation

In order to assess the pasclass="Chemical">sivation quclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">ality of the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface, contactless lifetime samples are fabricated on 300 µm thick (100)-oriented p-type float-zone silicon (FZ-Si) wafers with a resistivity of 200 Ωcm. After RCA cleaning, one wafer surface is passivated by a 100 nm thick plasma-enhanced-chemical-vapor-deposited (PECVD) SiNx layer (Plasmalab 80 Plus, Oxford) with a refractive index of 2.4 at a deposition temperature of 400 °C. After SiN deposition, the samples are dipped in 1% hydrofluoric acid (HF) for 60 seconds. The PEDOT:PSS dispersion (Clevios special grade, Clevios Heraeus GmbH), which has a solid content of 2.2 wt.% of PEDOT:PSS in water, was mixed with 1.0 to 18.0 wt.% sorbitol and stirred overnight at room temperature on a magnetic stirrer. Immediately after the HF dip, the PEDOT:PSS dispersion is deposited by spin coating at 500 revolutions per minute (rpm) for 10 seconds and subsequently 1500 rpm for 30 seconds. Subsequently, the PEDOT:PSS layer is annealed in ambient environment at a temperature of 130 °C for 10 min. Injection-dependent measurements of the effective carrier lifetime τeff(Δn) are performed using a Sinton Lifetime Tester (WCT-120, Sinton Instruments). The recombination current density parameter (also sometimes denoted ‘saturation current density’) J0 of each measured sample is extracted from the slope of the inverse lifetime 1/τeff vs. the excess carrier density Δn curve[16].

Solar cell fabrication

Figure 1 shows the cross-section of a Backclass="Chemical">PEDOT solar cell. For the solar cell fabrication we use 300 µm thick 6″ (100)-oriented class="Chemical">p-tyclass="Chemical">pe class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">boron-doped FZ-Si wafers with resistivities of 0.5 and 1.3 Ωcm, respectively. After RCA cleaning and protecting both surfaces by a 200 nm thick dielectric SiO2 layer, 2 × 2 cm2 diffusion windows are opened by laser ablation on one wafer surface. After one more RCA cleaning sequence, the silicon surface within the ablated window is random-pyramid-textured using a KOH/isopropanol solution. Subsequently, an n+ emitter with a sheet resistance in the range 92–110 Ω/sq is formed by phosphorus in-diffusion in a quartz-tube furnace (TS 81004, Tempress) at 830 °C in a POCl3/O2 atmosphere. The wafers are then laser-cut into 2.49 × 2.49 cm2 large samples, and after additional cleaning, the phosphorus silicate glass is removed in a 1% HF solution. An 0.24 nm thick AlO tunneling layer is then deposited by means of plasma-assisted atomic layer deposition (FlexAL, Oxford Instruments) on the front surface. Next, an aluminum grid is deposited on the cell front through a nickel shadow mask by electron beam evaporation (BAK 550, Balzers). The front surface is then coated by a surface-passivating PECVD SiN layer (Plasmalab 80 Plus, Oxford) with a refractive index of 2.4 (6 nm) and on top of that by a SiN antireflection coating with a refractive index of 1.9 (75 nm). Subsequently, the cells are annealed for 2 min at 320 °C in order to improve the front surface passivation and for contact formation[17]. Before depositing the PEDOT:PSS to the cell rear, the dielectric SiO2 protection layer at the rear is removed using 40% HF. The PEDOT:PSS dispersion (Clevios special grade, Clevios Heraeus GmbH), which has a solid content of 2.2 wt.%, was mixed with 1.0 to 7.7 wt.% sorbitol and stirred overnight on a magnetic stirrer. The PEDOT:PSS dispersion is deposited by spin-coating at 500 rpm for 10 seconds and subsequently 12000 rpm for 30 seconds. The coated PEDOT:PSS layer is annealed in ambient environment at 130 °C for 10 min. Finally, the rear surface is full-area metallized by a 1 µm thick silver layer deposited using electron beam evaporation (BAK 550, Balzers).
Figure 1

Cross-section of a BackPEDOT solar cell.

Cross-section of a Backpan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cell.

Results and Discussion

Surface passivation

Figure 2 shows a box plot of the measured recombination current denclass="Chemical">sity class="Chemical">parameter J0.class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT of the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface as a function of the sorbitol content added to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion.
Figure 2

Box plot of the recombination current density parameter J0.PEDOT of the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface as a function of the sorbitol content of the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. PEDOT:PSS was applied to 9 test samples for each sorbitol concentration. The J0.SiN value of 16 fA/cm2 of the SiN-passivated silicon surface was subtracted from the measured J0 value to account only for recombination at the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface.

Box plot of the recombination current denclass="Chemical">sity class="Chemical">parameter J0.class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT of the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface as a function of the sorbitol content of the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. PEDOT:PSS was applied to 9 test samples for each sorbitol concentration. The J0.SiN value of 16 fA/cm2 of the SiN-passivated silicon surface was subtracted from the measured J0 value to account only for recombination at the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface. Table 1 shows the class="Chemical">PEDOT:class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PSS layer thicknesses of the lifetime samples shown in Fig. 2. The correponding total sheet resistances are also shown in Table 1. The reduction of the sheet resistance by adding more than 1.0 wt.% sorbitol agrees well with the behaviour reported in the literature that sorbitol serves as a conductivity-increasing additive[14,15]. The PEDOT:PSS layer thicknesses were determined using a profilometer (Dektak 150, Veeco) and the corresponding sheet resistances were measured using a Sinton lifetime tester (WCT-120, Sinton Instruments). J0.PEDOT was extracted from the measured overall J0 values by subtraction of the J0.SiN value of the SiN-passivated wafer surface. J0.SiN was determined on both-sides-SiN-passivated wafers with a median value of 16 fA/cm2. For silicon surfaces passivated with PEDOT:PSS without admixture of sorbitol, we measure a median J0.PEDOT value of 86 fA/cm2. We observe that with increasing sorbitol content of the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion the measured J0.PEDOT decreases. At a sorbitol concentration of 4.0 wt.% in the precursor dispersion, we measure a median J0.PEDOT value of 64 fA/cm2. At at a sorbitol concentration of 7.7 wt.%, a median J0:PEDOT of only 38 fA/cm2 is achieved, which means that the recombination at the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface is more than halved by adding 7.7 wt.% of sorbitol to the precursor solution. At even higher sorbitol concentrations of 11 wt.% and 14 wt.% the J0.PEDOT value rises to a median of 55 fA/cm2 and 58 fA/cm2 respectively. A sorbitol concentration of 18 wt.% provides a J0.PEDOT median of 49 fA/cm2. According to our results a saturation in J0.PEDOT at high sorbitol concentrations can be observed. Nardes et al.[18] have shown that the addition of sorbitol reduces the work function of PEDOT:PSS for sorbitol concentration of 5 wt.%, and for higher sorbitol concentrations a saturation in the work function occurs. The positive impact of sorbitol on the electronic passivation properties of PEDOT:PSS on c-Si might be due to a change in the electronic band structure of the organic solution. It is well known from the literature that the addition of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion reduces the work function of the PEDOT:PSS with increasing sorbitol content[18-21]. Our results here clearly prove that adding sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor solution significantly improves the c-Si surface passivation quality.
Table 1

Mean PEDOT:PSS layer thicknesses measured using a profilometer (Dektak 150, Veeco) and total sheet resistances of the lifetime samples measured using a Sinton lifetime tester (WCT-120, Sinton Instruments) for PEDOT:PSS applications at spin coating speeds of 1500 and 12000 rpm, respectively.

Sorbitol content in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion [wt.%]PEDOT:PSS layer thickness [nm]Total sheet resistance [Ω/□]
PEDOT:PSS applied at 1500 rpmPEDOT:PSS applied at 12000 rpmPEDOT:PSS applied at 1500 rpmPEDOT:PSS applied at 12000 rpm
0.01674 ± 343181 ± 6022692518
1.0978 ± 123140 ± 3618512056
2.01070 ± 125146 ± 321242083
4.01623 ± 240162 ± 4167.3435
5.72137 ± 237163 ± 3961.5304
7.72087 ± 322184 ± 5560.2274
11.01033 ± 4799.2
14.01766 ± 5276.6
18.01936 ± 8179.6

The PEDOT:PSS layer thickness measurements were performed in 1 mm steps over a length of 2 cm (20 data points) centered in the sample center. The error bars result from the deviation of the mean value.

Mean class="Chemical">PEDOT:class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PSS layer thicknesses measured using a profilometer (Dektak 150, Veeco) and total sheet resistances of the lifetime samples measured using a Sinton lifetime tester (WCT-120, Sinton Instruments) for PEDOT:PSS applications at spin coating speeds of 1500 and 12000 rpm, respectively. The class="Chemical">PEDOT:class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PSS layer thickness measurements were performed in 1 mm steps over a length of 2 cm (20 data points) centered in the sample center. The error bars result from the deviation of the mean value.

Solar cells

A totclass="Chemical">al of 42 class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells with an area of 2 × 2 cm2 were fabricated. The precursor dispersion of the spin-coated PEDOT:PSS layer on the solar cell rear was mixed with different contents of sorbitol and stirred overnight on a magnetic stirrer. We examine the impact of the sorbitol admixture on the most relevant solar cell parameters that are the open-circuit voltage Voc, the short-circuit current density Jsc, the fill factor FF and the series resistance Rs as well as the energy conversion efficiency η. The Jsc − Voc characteristics as well as the illuminated current-voltage (J–V) curves are measured under standard testing conditions at 1 sun and 25 °C using a LOANA measurement system (pv-tools, Hamelin, Germany). The series resistance Rs is determined from the measured fill factor FF, pseudo-fill factor pFF as well as the measured Jsc and Voc values using the equation: As the open-circuit voltage Voc is very senclass="Chemical">sitive to recombination losses, the class="Chemical">poclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sitive impact of the sorbitol admixture observed on the lifetime test samples shown in Fig. 2, should translate to increased Voc values on the solar cells with sorbitol admixture. Figure 3(a) shows the measured Voc values of each processed BackPEDOT solar cell as a function of the sorbitol concentration in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. The median parameters of the solar cells with 0.5 Ωcm base resistivity are shown in Table 2 and the parameters of the 1.3 Ωcm cells in Table 3.
Figure 3

(a) Measured Voc values of all processed PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. (b) Measured Jsc values of solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. Solar cells with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm (red circles) and 1.3 Ωcm (blue triangles) are shown.

Table 2

Median and maximum values of the cell parameters for BackPEDOT solar cells with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm.

Sorbitol content in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion [wt.%]Voc [mV]Jsc [mA/cm2]FF [%]η [%]Rs [Ωcm2]
MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMin.
0.0 (4 cells)65565637.638.077.679.419.119.81.140.67
1.0 (6 cells)65665838.438.679.680.720.020.10.720.60
2.0 (4 cells)65765838.238.577.880.619.620.21.020.62
4.0 (5 cells)65966138.538.679.780.320.120.40.730.66
5.7 (6 cells)65065337.938.774.977.818.319.21.661.18
7.7 (4 cells)65466138.738.974.575.318.919.11.881.52
Table 3

Median and maximum values of the cell parameters for BackPEDOT solar cells with a base resistivity of 1.3 Ωcm.

Sorbitol content in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion [wt.%]Voc [mV]Jsc [mA/cm2]FF [%]η [%]Rs [Ωcm2]
MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMax.MedianMin.
0.0 (2 cells)65765738.638.875.175.619.019.31.551.48
1.0 (1 cells)65765739.039.078.978.920.220.20.860.86
2.0 (2 cells)65966039.039.175.475.719.419.41.471.42
4.0 (1 cells)66066039.039.078.678.620.320.30.890.89
5.7 (3 cells)64365538.539.072.676.517.919.51.981.27
7.7 (3 cells)65665939.539.571.174.018.519.32.511.92
(a) Measured Voc vclass="Chemical">alues of class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">all processed PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. (b) Measured Jsc values of solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. Solar cells with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm (red circles) and 1.3 Ωcm (blue triangles) are shown. Median and maximum vclass="Chemical">alues of the cell class="Chemical">parameters for Backclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cells with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm. Median and maximum vclass="Chemical">alues of the cell class="Chemical">parameters for Backclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cells with a base resistivity of 1.3 Ωcm. As can be seen from Fig. 3(a) and Tables 2 and 3, Voc increases from a median vclass="Chemical">alue of 655 mV to 659 mV for the 0.5-Ωcm class="Chemical">p-class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">Si base material and from 657 mV to 660 mV for the 1.3-Ωcm base material by adding 4.0 wt.% of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. At a sorbitol concentration of 5.7 wt.%, the median Voc values decrease to 650 mV for the 0.5-Ωcm cells and to 643 mV for the 1.3-Ωcm cells. While the improvement in Voc by the admixture of up to 4.0 wt.% of sorbitol is in good agreement with our lifetime study shown in Fig. 2, the reduced Voc at 5.7 wt.% admixture of sorbitol is unexpected and somewhat peculiar, but seems to be reproducible, as it was observed in all eight cell batches processed within this work. Increasing the sorbitol content further to 7.7 wt.% increases the median Voc approximately back to the state without sorbitol admixture. Nevertheless, the maximum Voc value of a single cell of 661 mV was achieved on a 0.5-Ωcm cell with 7.7 wt.% sorbitol admixture. From our experimental results obtained on 42 processed BackPEDOT cells we hence conclude that the admixture of sorbitol can have a clear positive impact on the passivation quality of the PEDPOT:PSS/c-Si junction, although not too much of sorbitol should be added. Figure 3(b) compiles the measured Jsc values of all processed PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells as a function of the sorbitol concentration (median values listed in Tables 2 and 3). The solar cells with 1.3-Ωcm base material provide higher Jsc values compared to the solar cells fabricated on 0.5-Ωcm base material, which can be attributed to the much higher bulk lifetime in the silicon material with lower doping concentration. Lifetime measurements performed on the 0.5-Ωcm p-type FZ-Si material verified that the bulk lifetime of this material is 0.77 ms, whereas that of the 1.3-Ωcm material is 1.56 ms at an excess carrier density Δn of 3 × 1015 cm3. For both base materials, the addition of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS is positively affecting the Jsc value. For the 0.5-Ωcm material, the median Jsc increases by 0.7 mA/cm2 by adding a sorbitol concentration of 4.0 wt.% to the PEDOT:PSS dispersion. At a higher sorbitol contents of 7.7 wt.% the median Jsc increases even more by 0.9 mA/cm2 compared to the reference case without sorbitol. For the BackPEDOT cells fabricated on the 1.3-Ωcm p-Si base material, the median Jsc increases by 0.8 mA/cm2 for a sorbitol concentration of 7.7 wt.% compared to the reference without sorbitol. In this study, the highest measured Jsc on a PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cell with a base resistivity of 1.3 Ωcm is 39.6 mA/cm2 for a sorbitol content of 7.7 wt.% of the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. From these results it becomes obvious that the addition of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS dispersion effectively reduces the parasitic absorption losses in PEDOT:PSS/c-Si heterojunction cells. Figure 4 shows the measured change in the internclass="Chemical">al quantum efficiencies ΔIQE and the change in the reflectance sclass="Chemical">pectra uclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">sing the LOANA measurement system of two exemplary BackPEDOT solar cells for sorbitol contents in the precursor dispersion of 4.0 and 7.7 wt.%, respectively in comparison to a solar cell without sorbitol in the precursor dispersion. The long-wavelength reflectance above 1000 nm is clearly increased by adding the sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion in comparison to the solar cell without admixture of sorbitol, which is attributed to the reduced parasitic absorption in the PEDOT:PSS layer[13]. Moreover, ΔIQE is improved in the long-wavelengths range above 800 nm for the solar cells with sorbitol addition, which is attributed to the improvement in the rear passivation of the BackPEDOT cell and in the improved light trapping due to the reduced parasitic absorption within the PEDOT:PSS layer.
Figure 4

Measured change in the internal quantum efficiency (ΔIQE) (blue circles and red triangles) and change in reflectance (blue squares and red diamonds) of exemplary BackPEDOT solar cells by adding 4.0 wt.% (red symbols) and 7.7 wt.% (blue symbols) sorbitol compared to a BackPEDOT solar cell without sorbitol. The solar cells have a p-type c-Si base with a resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm and the PEDOT:PSS was spin-coated at 500 rpm for 10 seconds and subsequently at 12000 rpm for 30 seconds.

Measured change in the internclass="Chemical">al quantum efficiency (ΔIQE) (blue circles and red triangles) and change in reflectance (blue squares and red diamonds) of exemclass="Chemical">plary Backclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cells by adding 4.0 wt.% (red symbols) and 7.7 wt.% (blue symbols) sorbitol compared to a BackPEDOT solar cell without sorbitol. The solar cells have a p-type c-Si base with a resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm and the PEDOT:PSS was spin-coated at 500 rpm for 10 seconds and subsequently at 12000 rpm for 30 seconds. Figure 5(a) (and Tables 2 and 3) shows the series reclass="Chemical">sistance Rs of the fabricated Backclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cells as a function of the sorbitol content in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. Up to a sorbitol concentration of 4.0 wt.% the best Rs values remain at a constant low level of approximately 0.6 to 1.0 Ωcm2. However, there are also outliers with increased series resistance with values around 1.5 Ωcm2. At higher sorbitol contents, Rs shows a pronounced increase with increasing sorbitol content. Median Rs values are 1.59 Ωcm2 for a sorbitol content of 5.7 wt.% and 1.85 Ωcm2 for a sorbitol content of 7.7 wt.%. We attribute the increase in the Rs values for sorbitol contents greater than 4.0 wt.% to a degradation of the solar cell back contact due to the high thermal energy of the electron beam evaporation in combination with a presumably remaining sorbitol content in the PEDOT:PSS layer. Optical microscope images of the metallized cell rear for the different sorbitol concentrations are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. The amount of sorbitol remaining in the PEDOT:PSS layer is probably higher for sorbitol contents greater 4 wt.% than for lower sorbitol concentrations. Therefore, we observe an increase in Rs only at high sorbitol concentrations. The best Rs value realized on a solar cell processed in this study is 0.6 Ωcm2 for a sorbitol concentration of 4.0 wt.%, which led to an efficiency of 20.2%. The achieved efficiencies of all fabricated BackPEDOT solar cells as a function of the sorbitol concentration are shown in Fig. 5(b). For PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cells manufactured with the PEDOT:PSS dispersion without addition of sorbitol, efficiencies range from 18.4 to 19.7%. By adding a sorbitol content to the precursor dispersion of up to 4.0 wt.%, higher cell efficiencies of up to 20.4% are achieved. If a sorbitol content of more than 4.0 wt.% is added to the precursor dispersion, the cell efficiencies decrease and range from 17.9% to 19.2% at a sorbitol content of 7.7 wt.%. The decrease in solar cell efficiencies with higher sorbitol content is attributed to the increasing Rs value. The best efficiency measured in this study on a PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cell is 20.4% with a sorbitol content in the precursor dispersion of 4.0 wt.%. The illuminated J–V curve and the Jsc − Voc curve of the best solar cell of this study with the corresponding solar cell parameters is shown in Fig. 6.
Figure 5

(a) Measured series resistance Rs of the fabricated BackPEDOT solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. (b) Measured solar cell efficiency η of the fabricated solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. Solar cells have been fabricated on p-type silicon wafers with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm (red circles) and 1.3 Ωcm (blue triangles), respectively.

Figure 6

Illuminated J–V curve (red circles) and Jsc − Voc curve (blue triangles) of the best solar cell of this study with 4.0 wt.% admixture of sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. The corresponding solar cell parameters are also shown.

(a) Measured series reclass="Chemical">sistance Rs of the fabricated Backclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. (b) Measured solar cell efficiency η of the fabricated solar cells for different amounts of sorbitol in the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. Solar cells have been fabricated on p-type silicon wafers with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm (red circles) and 1.3 Ωcm (blue triangles), respectively. Illuminated J–V curve (red circles) and Jsc − Voc curve (blue triangles) of the best solar cell of this study with 4.0 wt.% admixture of class="Chemical">sorbitol to the class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion. The corresponding solar cell parameters are also shown. The best Backclass="Chemical">PEDOT solar cell fabricated in this study, shown in Fig. 6, class="Chemical">provides a Voc of 660 mV and a Jsc vclass="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">alue of 38.5 mA/cm2. A good fill factor of 80.0% is achieved due to a low Rs value of 0.73 Ωcm2. This combination of cell parameters leads to the highest efficiency achieved in this study of 20.4% for a PEDOT:PSS/c-Si solar cell with admixture of 4.0 wt.% sorbitol to the precursor dispersion. The Jsc value of 38.5 mA/cm2 achieved on this cell seems relatively low and higher Jsc values (up to 39.6 mA/cm2) were achieved on the 1.3 Ωcm p-Si base material, featuring a much higher bulk lifetime compared to the 0.5 Ωcm bulk material. Hence, there seems to be a strong contribution of the bulk recombination in the record cell of our current study and the use of better bulk material should allow to further improve the efficiency.

Conclusions

In this study, we have fabricated 42 solar cells with class="Chemical">phosphorus-diffused front and class="Chemical">pan class="Chemical">PEDOT:PSS/c-Si heterojunction at the rear (‘BackPEDOT’ cells). We have examined the impact of adding sorbitol to the PEDOT:PSS precursor dispersion on the solar cell parameters. The recombination current density parameter J0.PEDOT of the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface showed a median J0.PEDOT value of 86 fA/cm2 for silicon surfaces passivated with PEDOT:PSS without admixture of sorbitol. At a sorbitol concentration of 7.7 wt.%, the median J0:PEDOT value was lowered to only 38 fA/cm2 which means that the recombination at the PEDOT:PSS/c-Si interface is effectively suppressed by the addtion of sorbitol. We also observed that the admixture of sorbitol improved the Jsc values due to the reduced parasitic absorption within the PEDOT:PSS layer, by 0.9 mA/cm2 at a sorbitol concentration of 7.7 wt.% on solar cells with a p-Si base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm. The highest achieved Jsc value was 39.6 mA/cm2 on a solar cell with a p-Si base resistivity of 1.3 Ωcm and a sorbitol concentration of 7.7 wt.%. Due to the improvement in the surface passivation quality due to the sorbitol admixture, we observed an increase in Voc of 4.0 mV on solar cells with a base resistivity of 0.5 Ωcm. An increase of 3.0 mV was observed for solar cells with 1.3 Ωcm base resistivity for admixture of sorbitol contents of 4.0 wt.% to the PEDOT:PSS dispersion. The maximum Voc value of a single cell of 661 mV was achieved on a 0.5-Ωcm cell with 7.7 wt.% sorbitol admixture. The series resistance Rs did not change by up to 4.0 wt.% of sorbitol admixture, but showed a pronounced increase at higher sorbitol concentrations. The optimal sorbitol content concerning efficiency is hence 4.0 wt.%, leading to a median efficiency of 20.2% (5 cells), which is 1.1% absolute higher compared to the median efficiency of the reference cells without sorbitol. The highest efficiency achieved in this study was 20.4% for a sorbitol content of 4.0 wt.%. Our experimental results hence suggest that the admixture of sorbitol increases the efficiency potential PEDOT:PSS/c-Si heterojunction solar cells. Opticpan class="Chemical">al microscoclass="Chemical">pe images
  2 in total

1.  Role of majority and minority carrier barriers silicon/organic hybrid heterojunction solar cells.

Authors:  Sushobhan Avasthi; Stephanie Lee; Yueh-Lin Loo; James C Sturm
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 30.849

2.  Unveiling the Hybrid n-Si/PEDOT:PSS Interface.

Authors:  Sara Jäckle; Martin Liebhaber; Jens Niederhausen; Matthias Büchele; Roberto Félix; Regan G Wilks; Marcus Bär; Klaus Lips; Silke Christiansen
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 9.229

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.