Literature DB >> 31277771

Clinical Stage Migration and Survival for Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.

Hiten D Patel1, Mohit Gupta2, Gregory A Joice2, Arnav Srivastava2, Ridwan Alam2, Mohamad E Allaf2, Phillip M Pierorazio2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since the 1980s has been accompanied by stage migration toward early-stage (stage I) cancers. Stage migration drove an apparent increase in survival for RCC since the 1980s, but it is unclear whether it remains a contributor more recently.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether clinical stage migration has persisted and the relative impact of stage migration versus improvements in treatment on survival for RCC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An epidemiologic assessment of stage migration and survival for 262 597 patients at diagnosis of RCC (2004-2015) across >1500 facilities in the National Cancer Database. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Proportion of patients over time was assessed by clinical stage at diagnosis via Cochran-Armitage chi-square tests and linear regression. Mortality data were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier method for 5-yr overall survival, Cox proportional hazards regression, and propensity score matching to differentiate the impact of treatment including systemic therapy from stage migration. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Greater diagnosis of clinical stage I disease (70%; p<0.001) was observed, with decreased diagnosis of stage III (8%; p<0.001) and stage IV (11%; p<0.001) up to 2007 followed by stabilization through 2015. Tumor size continues to decrease for localized tumors (mean-0.22cm stage I and-1.24cm stage II, 2004-2015). Histology demonstrated significant associations with stage. Five-year overall survival improved (67.9% [2004] to 72.3% [2010]) with gains in advanced RCC but not localized tumors. Models confirmed improved survival in recent years for stage IV patients. Systemic therapy was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.811 [0.786-0.837], p<0.001). National Cancer Database limitations apply.
CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients presenting with stage I RCC has stabilized (70%), suggesting that stage migration may have ended. Localized tumors are detected with decreasing size, while advanced cancers have remained stable. Only 11% of patients now present with distant metastatic disease, but 5-yr overall survival is improving in recent years due to improved treatments rather than stage migration. PATIENT
SUMMARY: In this study, we found that stage migration toward early-stage cancers has ended for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, improved treatment for advanced RCC appears to be responsible for improved survival in recent years.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney cancer; Renal cell carcinoma; Small renal mass; Stage migration

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31277771     DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol        ISSN: 2588-9311


  25 in total

1.  Acute kidney injury after partial nephrectomy: transient or permanent kidney damage?-Impact on long-term renal function.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rosiello; Umberto Capitanio; Alessandro Larcher
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-12

Review 2.  [Tumor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma : Comparison of immunotherapy with other drug options].

Authors:  A Uhlig
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Comparison of survival outcomes in patients with metastatic papillary vs. clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-score analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rosiello; Carlotta Palumbo; Sophie Knipper; Angela Pecoraro; Stefano Luzzago; Pierre-Antoine St-Hilaire; Zhe Tian; Umberto Capitanio; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The impact of sex and age on distribution of metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rosiello; Angela Pecoraro; Marina Deuker; Lara Franziska Stolzenbach; Thomas Martin; Zhe Tian; Alessandro Larcher; Umberto Capitanio; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Anil Kapoor; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Optimizing the management of patients with small renal masses in a Canadian context: A Markov decision-analysis model.

Authors:  Kristen McAlpine; Maneesh Sud; Antonio Finelli; Girish S Kulkarni
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Natural history of untreated kidney cancer.

Authors:  Kristen McAlpine; Antonio Finelli
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Prognostic Value of Histologic Subtype and Treatment Modality for T1a Kidney Cancers.

Authors:  Michael Siev; Audrey Renson; Hung-Jui Tan; Tracy L Rose; Stella K Kang; William C Huang; Marc A Bjurlin
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2020-03-30

Review 8.  Decision-making in active surveillance in kidney cancer: current trends and future urine and tissue markers.

Authors:  Sunil H Patel; Nirmish Singla; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Demographic Factors Associated With Non-Guideline-Based Treatment of Kidney Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Howard; Karabi Nandy; Solomon L Woldu; Vitaly Margulis
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01

Review 10.  A 25 year perspective on the evolution and advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation and treatment of kidney cancer.

Authors:  Daniel M Geynisman; Jodi K Maranchie; Mark W Ball; Gennady Bratslavsky; Eric A Singer
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.954

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.