| Literature DB >> 31277695 |
Marit Ilves1, Pia Anneli Sofia Kinaret2,3, Joseph Ndika1, Piia Karisola1, Veer Marwah2,3, Vittorio Fortino2,4, Yuri Fedutik5, Manuel Correia6, Nicky Ehrlich7, Katrin Loeschner6, Alexandros Besinis8,9, Joanne Vassallo8, Richard D Handy8, Henrik Wolff10,11, Kai Savolainen10, Dario Greco2,3, Harri Alenius12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Copper oxide (CuO) nanomaterials are used in a wide range of industrial and commercial applications. These materials can be hazardous, especially if they are inhaled. As a result, the pulmonary effects of CuO nanomaterials have been studied in healthy subjects but limited knowledge exists today about their effects on lungs with allergic airway inflammation (AAI). The objective of this study was to investigate how pristine CuO modulates allergic lung inflammation and whether surface modifications can influence its reactivity. CuO and its carboxylated (CuO COOH), methylaminated (CuO NH3) and PEGylated (CuO PEG) derivatives were administered here on four consecutive days via oropharyngeal aspiration in a mouse model of AAI. Standard genome-wide gene expression profiling as well as conventional histopathological and immunological methods were used to investigate the modulatory effects of the nanomaterials on both healthy and compromised immune system.Entities:
Keywords: Allergic airway inflammation; Asthma; CuO; Engineered nanomaterial; Health effects; Inflammation; Risk assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31277695 PMCID: PMC6612204 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-019-0309-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Characterization of the CuO-containing ENMs from the original powders, adapted from Vassallo et al. [15]
| Test material (Supplier) | Manufacturer’s information | cMeasured primary particle size (nm) | dMeasured hydrodynamic diameter in ultrapure water or Krebs saline (nm) | eTotal measured copper concentration (mg l-1) | fPercentage of nominal concentration (%) | gMeasured copper fraction in coated CuO NPs | hMetal dissolution rate in ultrapure water or Krebs saline (μg Cu h-1) | iZeta potential in ultrapure water (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
aCuO NPs uncoated, CAS 1317-38-0 (PlasmaChem GmbH, Lot YF1309121) | 99% purity; diameter, 10 - 20 nm; bsurface area 42 ± 2 m2 g-1 | 12.00 ± 0.37 | 41 ± 28 (water) 62 ± 50 (Krebs) | 287.1 ± 14.4 | 89.7 ± 4.5 | -- | 1.68 (water) 1.21 (Krebs) | 14.0 ± 1.2 |
| aCuO NPs COOH-coated, CAS 1317-38-0 (PlasmaChem GmbH, Lot YF140114) | 99% purity; diameter, 10 - 20 nm; bsurface area, 7.4 ± 0.5 m2 g-1 | 6.45 ± 0.16 | 121 ± 91 (water) 128 ± 58 (Krebs) | 154.3 ± 6.9 | - | 0.43 ± 0.02 | 69.12 (water) 18.15 (Krebs) | - 7.3 ± 0.5 |
| aCuO NPs NH4+-coated, CAS 1317-38-0 (PlasmaChem GmbH, Lot YF140114) | 99% purity; diameter, 10 - 20 nm; bsurface area, 6.1 ± 0.5 m2 g-1 | 9.53 ± 0.22 | 46 ± 36 (water) 96 ± 75 (Krebs) | 185.9 ± 7.2 | - | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 18.6 (water) 12.22 (Krebs) | 27.7 ± 0.5 |
| aCuO NPs PEG-coated, CAS 1317-38-0 (PlasmaChem GmbH, Lot YF140114) | 99% purity; diameter, 10 - 20 nm | 7.46 ± 0.42 | 100 ± 36 (water) 189 ± 113(Krebs) | 105.0 ± 3.5 | - | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 52.02 (water) 17.44 (Krebs) | - 16.8 ± 0.4 |
aSupplied as dry powders, bespoke design and production of spherical particles for the NANOSOLUTIONS project via Alexei Antipov, PlasmaChem GmbH
bBrunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area values (mean ± one standard deviation, n = 3) from NANOSOLUTIONS project conducted by A. Besinis
cBased on transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of CuO ENMs from a 100 mg l-1 Cu stocks in Milli-Q water where data are mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M) with n = 60 measurements
dParticle size distribution measurements (mean ± one standard deviation, n = 3) by Nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) on 100 mg l-1 Cu ENM stocks in Milli-Q water or Krebs physiological saline at pH 7.4
eData are means ± S.E.M (n = 3 replicates) of total measured copper concentration by ICP-OES following aqua regia acid digestion of the dry powders, and after normalisation to an initial 0.02 g weight of material; Cupric oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs)
fWith a 0.8 fraction of copper by weight in uncoated CuO NPs
gRelative to the measured copper content in the uncoated CuO NPs
hMaximum slope from rectangular hyperbola function of curve fitting used to estimate the maximum rate of dissolution of copper from the dialysis experiments, in triplicate
iZeta potential of CuO dispersions in ultrapure water (pH 5) as an average of five separate measurements.- Not possible to calculate from the manufacturer’s information on material composition; -- Data not applicable to the test material. The Krebs physiological saline data are from Besinis and Handy, unpublished
Fig. 1Cell counts, expression and release of (pro-)inflammatory markers following exposure to CuO materials. BALB/c mice were sensitized ip to OVA/Alum on day 1 and 10, and exposed repeatedly to 2.5, 10 or 40 μg/mouse of CuO nanomaterials dispersed in PBS with or without OVA by oropharyngeal aspiration after a 10-day recovery period. a BAL cell counts showed the ability of CuO materials to trigger an increase in the number of macrophages, lymphocytes and especially neutrophils into the airways of both PBS- and OVA-challenged mice whereas eosinophils were detected only in OVA-challenged groups. b PAS staining revealed that CuO materials did not activate mucin-production in goblet cells. c Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF and IL-33 were expressed in PBS-challenged as well as OVA-challenged mice while Th2 type cytokine IL-13 was expressed only in OVA-challenged mice. d IL-13 protein was detected in BAL supernatants by ELISA also only in OVA-challenged mice. Results in a-b are shown with the highest number of cells marked on top of each plot. Columns and error bars represent mean values ± standard error of mean (SEM). Statistically significant differences between experimental groups and PBS-challenged control mice are marked with “*” whereas the ones between experimental groups and OVA-challenged control mice are marked with “•”. */•P < 0.05; **/••P < 0.01; ***/•••P < 0.001. HPF, high power field; PAS, periodic acid–Schiff
Fig. 2Histological and immunohistochemical evaluation of the lung tissue after exposure to CuO nanomaterials. BALB/c mice were sensitized ip to OVA/Alum on day 1 and 10, and exposed repeatedly to 2.5, 10 or 40 μg/mouse of CuO nanomaterials dispersed in PBS with or without OVA by oropharyngeal aspiration after a 10-day recovery period. H&E-stained lung tissue of a a PBS-challenged control, b OVA-challenged, c PBS-challenged and 40 μg of core CuO-exposed, and d OVA-challenged and 40 μg of core CuO-exposed mouse. The presence of eosinophils in OVA-challenged mice and neutrophils accompanied with nuclear dust in CuO-treated mice were found. E, The number of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the lung tissue. Images a-d are shown at × 400 magnification with a 50-μm scale bar. Arrows in the insets indicate the location of nuclear dust. Counts of T cell subtypes in e are shown as positive cells per high power field (HPF) with the highest number of cells marked on top of each plot. Columns and error bars represent mean values ± standard error of mean (SEM). Statistically significant differences between experimental groups and PBS-challenged control mice are marked with “*” whereas the ones between experimental groups and OVA-challenged control mice are marked with “•”. */•P < 0.05; ***/•••P < 0.001
Fig. 3Differential gene expression analysis. a Heat map of top 500 differentially expressed genes (linear FC > |1.5|, adjusted P value < 0.05) in each analyzed lung tissue sample of PBS- and OVA-challenged mice exposed to CuO nanomaterials by oropharyngeal aspiration (2.5, 10 and 40 μg/mouse). Z-score normalized log2 intensity values were used as input for hierarchical clustering. Red color indicates a higher expression while green refers to a lower expression. b Numbers of total, up-regulated, down-regulated and exclusively differentially expressed genes (DEGs; linear FC > |1.5|, adjusted P value < 0.05) in lung tissue after exposure to CuO nanomaterials of PBS- and OVA-challenged mice versus the corresponding control mice. c UpSet plots showing 20 largest intersections of DEGs that are either specific to a treatment or shared between experimental groups among PBS and OVA-challenged mice. The upper bar chart indicates the number of DEGs in each intersection
Fig. 4General profiling of canonical pathways and biological processes in PBS-challenged mice after CuO, CuO COOH and CuO NH3 exposure. Experimental groups of exposed PBS-challenged mice were merged based on the test material, and their transcriptomic profiles were compared against the one of PBS-challenged controls. a A Venn distribution of the number of DEGs (linear FC > |1.5|, adjusted P value < 0.05) in lungs of PBS-challenged mice exposed to CuO nanomaterials by oropharyngeal aspiration (2.5, 10 and 40 μg/mouse). b A heat map showing the activation z-scores of IPA canonical pathways filtered with z-score > 2 and -log(P value) > 2 across the materials. c Venn comparison of significantly enriched biological processes (adjusted P value < 0.05) obtained from analyses of DEG sets shown in (a). d 17 biological processes were commonly enriched by DEGs from the CuO, CuO COOH and CuO NH3 exposures
Fig. 5Modulatory effects of surface functional groups on CuO bioreactivity. As shown in (a), at each dose, the experimental group of every functionalized material was compared against core CuO in PBS- or OVA-challenged mice. The most drastic effect was induced by PEGylation, as seen from the Number of DEGs and enriched biological processes (a). The top canonical pathways enriched by down-regulated genes in PBS mice exposed to 2.5 μg of CuO PEG as compared with core CuO at the same dose, or enriched by up-regulated genes in OVA-challenged mice exposed to 40 μg of CuO PEG as compared with core CuO at the same dose are shown in (b) and (c) respectively. b-c The x-axis represents the pathways identified. The y-axis on left shows the -log(P value) calculated based on Fisher’s exact test. Threshold level is set on a P value of 0.05. The y-axis on right represents a ratio between a number of DEGs in a given pathway with a cut-off -log(P value) > 2, divided by total number of genes belonging to the reference gene set of the pathway. The orange- and blue-colored bars indicate predicted pathway activation or inhibition, respectively