| Literature DB >> 31277637 |
Jihye Yu1, Sukyung Lee2, Miran Kim3, Kiyoung Lim4, Kihong Chang1, Sujin Chae5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical school faculty members have been reported to be highly likely to suffer burnout. Research is being conducted on professional self-concepts as a factor that relieves burnout in many professions. However, there is a paucity of data on the relationship between professional self-concept and burnout among medical school faculty. Professional self-concept means a perception of oneself as a member of the profession. It influences an individual's thoughts, actions, and emotions. The more positive the professional self-concept, the higher is the self-esteem in the profession, which can contribute to reducing burnout. This study aimed to investigate the professional self-concept and incidence of burnout among medical school clinical faculty members, and to ascertain the factors that affect professional self-concept with respect to burnout.Entities:
Keywords: Burnout; Faculty development; Faculty of medicine; Professional self-concept
Year: 2019 PMID: 31277637 PMCID: PMC6612083 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1682-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Characteristics of participants (N = 68)
| Variable | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 41 (60.3) |
| Female | 27 (39.7) |
| Faculty Position | |
| Assistant professor | 27 (39.7) |
| Associate professor | 20 (29.4) |
| Professor | 21 (30.9) |
| Field of Specialty | |
| Internal medicine | 30 (44.1) |
| Surgery | 21 (30.9) |
| Supportive care medicinea | 17 (25.0) |
aThe Supportive care medicine field includes emergency medicine, rehabilitation medicine, anesthesiology, radiology, and clinical pathology
Means, standard errors, and standard deviations for professional self-concept and burnout
| Variable | Mean |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| PSC | 3.09 | 0.05 | 0.41 |
| Professional practice | 3.30 | 0.05 | 0.41 |
| Leadership | 3.10 | 0.07 | 0.54 |
| Flexibility | 3.37 | 0.05 | 0.42 |
| Skill | 3.44 | 0.05 | 0.38 |
| Satisfaction | 3.06 | 0.07 | 0.56 |
| Communication | 2.89 | 0.06 | 0.51 |
| Burnout | 2.39 | 0.10 | 0.85 |
| EE | 3.02 | 0.12 | 0.99 |
| DP | 2.01 | 0.14 | 1.14 |
| RPA | 2.16 | 0.11 | 0.94 |
PSC Professional Self-Concept, EE Emotional Exhaustion, DP Depersonalization, RPA Reduced Personal Accomplishment
The relationship between professional self-concept and the burnout subscales
| Burnout | EE | DP | RPA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PSC | - 0.76** | - 0.59** | - 0.51** | - 0.83** |
| Professional practice | - 0.60** | - 0.40** | - 0.38** | - 0.74** |
| Leadership | - 0.63** | - 0.41** | - 0.42** | - 0.78** |
| Flexibility | - 0.56** | - 0.37** | - 0.36** | - 0.69** |
| Skill | - 0.41** | - 0.29* | - 0.24 | - 0.52** |
| Satisfaction | - 0.69** | - 0.65** | - 0.43** | - 0.65** |
| Communication | - 0.60** | - 0.38** | - 0.46** | - 0.68** |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
PSC Professional Self-Concept, EE Emotional Exhaustion, DP Depersonalization, RPA Reduced Personal Accomplishment
Multiple regression analysis for professional self-concept and burnout
| Dependent variable | Independent | Standardized |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| PSC | 0.13 | 0.09 | 3.17 | |||
| Gender | - 0.03 | −0.21 | ||||
| Position | 0.35 | 2.91** | ||||
| Specialty | - 0.10 | - 0.83 | ||||
| Burnout | 0.29 | 0.25 | 8.50 | |||
| Gender | 0.05 | 0.46 | ||||
| Position | - 0.51 | −4.70*** | ||||
| Specialty | - 0.08 | - 0.74 |
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
PSC Professional Self-Concept
Multiple regression analysis for burnout
| Variable | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Std. Error |
| ||
| Professional practice | −0.43 | 0.22 | −0.21 | −1.98 |
| Satisfaction | −0.62 | 0.16 | −0.41 | −3.85*** |
| Communication | −0.50 | 0.16 | −0.30 | −3.13** |
**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001