| Literature DB >> 31277634 |
Aparajita Chattopadhyay1, Vani Sethi2, Varsha P Nagargoje1, Abhishek Saraswat1, Nikita Surani1, Neeraj Agarwal3, Vikas Bhatia4, Manisha Ruikar5, Sourav Bhattacharjee6, Rabi N Parhi7, Shivani Dar7, Abner Daniel2, H P S Sachdev8, C M Singh3, Rajkumar Gope9, Vikash Nath9, Neha Sareen10, Arjan De Wagt2, Sayeed Unisa11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) practices may affect the growth and nutritional status among adolescents. Therefore, this paper assesses WASH practices and its association with nutritional status among adolescent girls.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent nutrition; BMI; MUAC; Menstrual hygiene; Open defecation; Stunting; WASH
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31277634 PMCID: PMC6612154 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-019-0787-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Percentage of adolescent girls by socio-demographic characteristics, WASH practices, and participation in programmes
| Characteristics | Bihar | Odisha | Chhattisgarh | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 10–14 years | 63.2 | 51.2 | 55.5 | 56.4 |
| 15–19 years | 36.8 | 48.8 | 44.5 | 43.6 |
| Religion | ||||
| Hindu | 41.9 | 95.3 | 98.3 | 82.3 |
| Non-Hindu | 58.1 | 4.7 | 1.7 | 17.7 |
| Caste | ||||
| Scheduled Caste (SC) | 19.1 | 15.4 | 2.4 | 10.4 |
| Scheduled Tribe (ST) | 4.9 | 54.1 | 65.1 | 46.0 |
| Other Backward Classes (OBCs) | 68.3 | 22.6 | 27.9 | 37.3 |
| Others | 7.7 | 7.9 | 4.6 | 6.3 |
| Wealth quintile | ||||
| Poorest | 6.2 | 32.2 | 21.2 | 20.0 |
| Poor | 13.2 | 23.3 | 21.7 | 20.0 |
| Middle | 24.5 | 16.4 | 19.5 | 20.0 |
| Rich | 31.8 | 15.0 | 16.1 | 20.0 |
| Richest | 24.4 | 13.2 | 21.5 | 20.0 |
| Currently attending school | ||||
| Yes | 80.6 | 57.3 | 74.8 | 71.6 |
| No | 19.4 | 42.7 | 25.2 | 28.4 |
| Engaged in work outside home | ||||
| Yes | 11.7 | 21.4 | 30.4 | 23.0 |
| No | 88.3 | 78.6 | 69.6 | 77.0 |
| Earnings in casha | ||||
| Yes | 88.9 | 98.3 | 98.9 | 97.4 |
| No | 11.1 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 2.6 |
| Main source of drinking water | ||||
| Improvedb | 99.9 | 83.0 | 95.0 | 93.1 |
| Unimproved | 0.1 | 17.0 | 5.0 | 6.9 |
| Accessibility to water facility | ||||
| Within premisesc | 0.1 | 1.7 | 7.3 | 3.8 |
| Out of premises | 99.9 | 98.3 | 92.7 | 96.2 |
| Type of sanitation facility used | ||||
| Improvedd | 18.1 | 12.7 | 16.2 | 15.7 |
| Unimprovede | 81.9 | 87.3 | 83.8 | 84.3 |
| Practice open defecationf | ||||
| Yes | 79.3 | 83.0 | 83.2 | 82.1 |
| No | 20.7 | 17.0 | 16.8 | 17.9 |
| Uses soap after defecation | ||||
| Yes | 72.8 | 63.1 | 74.8 | 71.1 |
| No | 27.2 | 36.9 | 25.2 | 28.9 |
| Uses sanitary napking during menstruationh | ||||
| Yes | 11.2 | 37.4 | 24.8 | 23.3 |
| No | 88.8 | 62.6 | 75.2 | 76.7 |
| Accessed adolescent health services in last six months | ||||
| Yes | 2.5 | 7.9 | 13.8 | 9.2 |
| No | 97.5 | 92.1 | 86.2 | 90.8 |
| Visited | ||||
| Yes | 3.4 | 27.0 | 37.1 | 25.3 |
| No | 96.6 | 73.0 | 62.9 | 74.7 |
| Accessed any health service/counselling from frontline health worker | ||||
| Yes | 2.7 | 20.1 | 18.0 | 14.5 |
| No | 97.3 | 79.9 | 82.0 | 85.5 |
| Attended any | ||||
| Yes | 2.1 | 9.0 | 5.9 | 5.7 |
| No | 97.9 | 91.0 | 94.1 | 94.3 |
| Able to make decision aboutown healthcare | ||||
| Yes | 25.6 | 62.3 | 36.8 | 40.7 |
| No | 74.4 | 37.7 | 63.2 | 59.3 |
Note:
aIncludes working women (1449) only. Hence sample does not match with total sample (6352)
bImproved source of drinking water as per WHO norm includes piped water into dwelling/yard/plot, public tap/standpipe, tube well or borehole, protected dug well, protected spring, rainwater, and community RO plant
cWater facility within premises includes water piped into a dwelling, plot or yard
dImproved sanitation facility as per WHO norms include flush or pour flush toilet/latrine to: piped sewer system, septic tank, pit latrine, ventilated improved pit (VIP)/biogas latrine, pit latrine with slab, twin pit/composting toilet
eUnimproved sanitation facilities includes: flush to somewhere else, pit latrine without slab/open pit, dry/service latrine
fOpen defecation represents household that have no sanitation facility and defecate in open spaces or field/jungle
gSanitary napkin refers to a sanitary pad or any locally prepared sanitary napkin
hIncludes menstruating girls (4869) only hence sample does not match total sample (6352)
Fig. 1Selected WASH practices in the study area
Logistic regression showing determinants of open defecation
| Characteristics | Odds ratio | CI (95%) |
|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic | ||
| Religion | ||
| Hindu® | ||
| Non-Hindu | 2.36*** | 1.87–2.97 |
| Caste | ||
| Others® | 1.00 | |
| Other Backward Classes (OBCs) | 1.20 | 0.93–1.55 |
| Scheduled Caste (SC) | 1.34* | 0.99–1.83 |
| Scheduled Tribe (ST) | 1.60*** | 1.23–2.08 |
| Wealth quintile | ||
| Richest® | ||
| Rich | 2.35*** | 1.95–2.84 |
| Middle | 2.76*** | 2.26–3.37 |
| Poor | 3.49*** | 2.81–4.32 |
| Poorest | 4.06*** | 3.25–5.08 |
| Currently attending school | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 1.13 | 0.95–1.35 |
| Engaged in paid work outside home | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 0.85 | 0.70–1.04 |
| Able to make decision aboutown healthcare | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 0.96 | 0.82–1.12 |
| WASH Practices and Programme Participation | ||
| Access to water facility | ||
| Within premises® | ||
| Out of premises | 1.73*** | 1.28–2.35 |
| Accessed adolescent health services organized by health department | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 1.03 | 0.79–1.34 |
| Visited | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 1.48*** | 1.24–1.75 |
| Accessed any health service or counselling from a frontline health worker | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 0.97 | 0.78–1.21 |
| Attended any | ||
| Yes® | ||
| No | 1.04 | 0.76–1.42 |
Note:® - Reference category; CI confidence interval, ***p < 0.01, *p < 0.10
Logistic regression showing predictors of sanitary napkin use
| Characteristics | Odds ratio | CI (95%) |
|---|---|---|
| Socio-demographic | ||
| Religion | ||
| Non-Hindu® | ||
| Hindu | 3.34*** | 2.37–4.71 |
| Caste | ||
| Scheduled Tribe (ST)® | ||
| Scheduled Caste (SC) | 0.87 | 0.63–1.19 |
| Other Backward Classes (OBCs) | 0.85 | 0.68–1.05 |
| General | 0.95 | 0.65–1.37 |
| Wealth quintile | ||
| Poorest® | ||
| Poor | 1.31* | 0.96–1.79 |
| Middle | 1.52*** | 1.13–2.05 |
| Rich | 2.25*** | 1.67–3.03 |
| Richest | 3.17*** | 2.33–4.30 |
| Currently attending school | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 2.19*** | 1.80–2.66 |
| Engaged in paid work outside home | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 0.72*** | 0.58–0.88 |
| Able to make decision about own healthcare | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 1.21** | 1.02–1.45 |
| WASH Practices and Programme Participation | ||
| Type of sanitation facility | ||
| Unimproved/Open Defecationa® | ||
| Improved | 1.34** | 1.07–1.68 |
| Accessed adolescent health services organized by health department | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 0.91 | 0.67–1.25 |
| Visited | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 1.07 | 0.87–1.32 |
| Accessed any health service or counselling from a frontline health worker | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 0.84 | 0.65–1.08 |
| Attended any | ||
| No® | ||
| Yes | 1.57** | 1.10–2.26 |
Note:® - Reference category; CI confidence interval, ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.10
aIn this category majority of the households practiced open defecation (97.8%) whereas only 2.2% used unimproved sanitation facilities
Percentage of early (10–14 years) and late (15–19 years) adolescent girls by stunting, BMI, and MUAC
| Bihar | Odisha | Chhattisgarh | Total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–14 | 15–19 | N | 10–14 | 15–19 | N | 10–14 | 15–19 | N | 10–14 | 15–19 | N | |
| Stunting | ||||||||||||
| < −2SD | 44.1 | 40.3 | 42.7 | 23.9 | 46.6 | 35.0 | 21.9 | 34.9 | 27.7 | 28.9 | 39.7 | 33.6 |
| <−3SD | 17.5 | 15.1 | 16.6 | 4.6 | 9.5 | 7.0 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 7.9 | 8.4 | 8.1 |
| N | 1032 | 596 | 1628 | 879 | 839 | 1718 | 1615 | 1300 | 2915 | 3526 | 2735 | 6261 |
| BMI | ||||||||||||
| < −2SD | 27.2 | 26.1 | 26.8 | 16.5 | 8.2 | 12.5 | 17.4 | 10.5 | 14.3 | 20.0 | 13.2 | 17.1 |
| <−3SD | 7.7 | 6.6 | 7.3 | 3.8 | 1.5 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 1.8 | 2.8 | 4.8 | 2.7 | 3.9 |
| N | 1030 | 593 | 1623 | 879 | 839 | 1718 | 1613 | 1297 | 2910 | 3522 | 2729 | 6251 |
| MUAC | ||||||||||||
| < 19 cm | 47.6 | 7.0 | 32.7 | 29.7 | 1.2 | 15.8 | 27.5 | 1.7 | 16.0 | 34.1 | 2.7 | 20.4 |
| < 17 cm | 20.7 | 2.1 | 13.9 | 7.5 | 0.1 | 3.9 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 3.1 | 10.5 | 0.6 | 6.2 |
| N | 1075 | 625 | 1700 | 879 | 840 | 1719 | 1615 | 1300 | 2915 | 3569 | 2765 | 6334 |
Fig. 2WHO standard median and observed medians for (a) height and (b) BMI among adolescent girls
Linear regression showing determining the nutritional status of adolescent girls
| Variables | Stunting | BMI | MUAC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficients | |||||||||
| 10–14 yrs | 15–19 yrs | Total | 10–14 yrs | 15–19 yrs | Total | 10–14 yrs | 15–19 yrs | Total | |
| Accessibility to water facility | |||||||||
| Within premises® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Out of premises | −0.20** | −0.16* | −0.19*** | −0.20** | −0.03 | −0.14* | −0.29 | −0.06 | −0.27 |
| Households’ sanitation facility | |||||||||
| Improved® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Unimproved/Open Defecation | −0.10* | − 0.04 | − 0.08** | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.32*** | − 0.09 | − 0.28*** |
| Uses soap after defecation | |||||||||
| Yes® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | −0.05 | −0.01 | − 0.01 | − 0.05 | 0.00 | − 0.03 | − 0.26*** | −0.17* | − 0.31*** |
| Uses sanitary napkin during menstruation | |||||||||
| Yes® | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | 1.00 | NA | NA | 1.00 | NA |
| No | NA | −0.04 | NA | NA | −0.05 | NA | NA | −0.04 | NA |
| Accessed adolescent health services organized by health department | |||||||||
| Yes® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.08 | −0.03 | 0.08 | 0.01 | −0.29 | −0.03 | − 0.26* |
| Visited | |||||||||
| Yes® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | −0.08 | −0.03 | − 0.01 | −0.08 | − 0.09** | −0.08** | − 0.52*** | −0.20** | − 0.66*** |
| Accessed any health service/counselling from a frontline health worker | |||||||||
| Yes® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.18 | 0.30 |
| Attended any | |||||||||
| Yes® | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| No | 0.02 | −0.04 | 0.01 | −0.22** | −0.00 | −0.09 | −0.62*** | −0.07 | − 0.40** |
Note:® - Reference category; ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1