Literature DB >> 31277551

A comparison of magnetic resonance imaging techniques used to secure biopsies in prostate cancer patients.

Annemarijke van Luijtelaar1, Joyce Bomers1, Jurgen Fütterer1.   

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common diagnosed malignancy among the male population in the United States. The incidence is increasing with an estimated amount of 175.000 cases in 2019. Areas covered: Primarily, PCa is generally detected by an elevated or rising serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE) followed by pathological examination. Histopathology ultimately confirms the presence of PCa and determines a Gleason score. However, PSA and DRE have low specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Subsequently, accurate assessment of the aggressiveness of PCa is essential to prevent overdiagnosis and thus overtreatment of low-risk or indolent cancers. By visualizing PCa suspicious lesions and sampling them during the targeted biopsy, it is likely that the diagnostic accuracy of significant PCa improves. This article reviews the current imaging techniques used to secure biopsies in patients with a suspicion of PCa. The advantages and limitations of each technique are described. Expert opinion: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and subsequent-targeted biopsy have improved the diagnostic accuracy of PCa detection in men with an elevated or rising serum PSA. Prostate lesions visible on mpMRI are easily targeted during either in-bore MRI-guided biopsy, cognitive fusion biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; MRI-TRUS fusion; cognitive fusion; image fusion; magnetic resonance imaging; multiparametric MRI; prostate cancer; software fusion; systematic biopsy; transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31277551     DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1641086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic value of combining PI-RADS v2.1 with PSAD in clinically significant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoting Wei; Jianmin Xu; Shuyuan Zhong; Jinsen Zou; Zhiqiang Cheng; Zhiguang Ding; Xuhui Zhou
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Micro-Ultrasound Imaging for Accuracy of Diagnosis in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Minhao Zhang; Rong Wang; Yuqing Wu; Jibo Jing; Shuqiu Chen; Guangyuan Zhang; Bin Xu; Chunhui Liu; Ming Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  A prospective study on inter-operator variability in semi-robotic software-based MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Manuel Ritter; Niklas Westhoff; Fabian Derigs; Samuel Doryumu; Fabian Tollens; Dominik Nörenberg; Manuel Neuberger; Jost von Hardenberg; Maurice Stephan Michel
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.