| Literature DB >> 31276908 |
Mads Gram Henriksen1, Josef Parnas2, Dan Zahavi3.
Abstract
In contemporary consciousness research, we have defended a position of experiential minimalism, arguing that for-me-ness (or minimal selfhood) is a necessary, universal feature of phenomenal consciousness. The concept of for-me-ness refers to the fact that experiences are given first-personally to the subject of experience. To challenge the universality of for-me-ness, several authors have referred to the case of thought insertion as a clear counter example. In this study, we address and refute the claim that episodes of thought insertion represent examples of experiences lacking for-me-ness. We highlight certain unaddressed methodological and psychopathological problems that tend to hamper philosophical discussions of thought insertion. Although thought insertion does not involve a lack of for-me-ness, we do argue that thought insertion involves a disturbed for-me-ness. Finally, we offer a novel account of how for-me-ness is disturbed in schizophrenia spectrum disorders and we discuss how a disturbed for-me-ness may be involved in the formation of thought insertion.Entities:
Keywords: Consciousness; First-rank symptoms; For-me-ness; Minimal self; Schizophrenia; Self-disorders; Thought insertion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31276908 DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.102770
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conscious Cogn ISSN: 1053-8100