Literature DB >> 31276830

Evaluation of strip meniscometry, tear meniscus height and depth in the diagnosis of dry eye disease in asian Indian eyes.

Archita Singh1, Murugesan Vanathi2, Alisha Kishore1, Noopur Gupta1, Radhika Tandon1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluate role of Strip Meniscometry (SMT) and lower tear meniscus [height (LTMH) & depth (LTMD)] in diagnosis of Dry Eye Disease (DED) and its comparison with TBUT.
METHODS: In a prospective observational cross-sectional study of 120 eyes [60 eyes of 30 DED (Group 1) & 60 eyes of 30 controls (Group 2)] TBUT, Schirmer's, SMT, LTMH and LTMD was done. Subjects >18 years diagnosed with DED (aqueous deficient) as per Tear film and Ocular surface society-Dry Eye Workshop (TFOS DEWS) II protocol and Ocular surface disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, with no associated systemic risk factor and previous ocular medical/surgical treatment were included as cases and subjects with no history of ocular surface disease as controls. The data was analyzed using t-test & receiver operating characteristic curve.
RESULTS: TBUT &amp; Schirmer's values were significantly lower in group 1 (p < 0.05). SMT was 2.28 ± 1.28 (Range 0-6) &amp; 8.11 ± 1.39 (Range 3-10) in group 1 &amp; 2 respectively (p < 0.05). LTMH was 169.32 ± 29.84 μm (Range 85.78-209.11) and 234.41 ± 19.51 μm (Range 203.89-289.53) in Group 1 &amp; 2 respectively (p < 0.05). LTMD was 144.32 ± 33.60 μm (Range 57.49-190.12) and 206.69 ± 14.17 μm (Range 187.12-251.50) in Group 1 &amp; 2 respectively (p < 0.05). The SMT, LTMH and LTMD showed a cutoff value of < 5 mm (AUC 0.994, sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 96.7%), 204.96 μm (AUC 0.998, sensitivity 98.3%, specificity 96.7%) &amp; 190 μm (AUC 0.995, sensitivity 96.7%, specificity 95%) respectively.
CONCLUSION: SMT, ASOCT, LTMD &amp; LTMH are useful non invasive diagnostic tests for DED comparable with TBUT.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dry eye disease; Lower tear film depth; Lower tear film height; Strip meniscometry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31276830     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ocul Surf        ISSN: 1542-0124            Impact factor:   5.033


  3 in total

1.  Diagnostic Performance of a Novel Noninvasive Workup in the Setting of Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Luca Vigo; Marco Pellegrini; Federico Bernabei; Francesco Carones; Vincenzo Scorcia; Giuseppe Giannaccare
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 1.909

2.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of SMTube Measurement in Dry Eye Disease Patients.

Authors:  Yiran Hao; Lei Tian; Kai Cao; Ying Jie
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  The Role of Different Tear Volume Detection Methods in the Evaluation and Diagnosis of Mild Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Yuzhou Wang; Zhiqiang Xu; Qianwen Gong; Wenjun Ren; Lin Chen; Fan Lu; Liang Hu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.283

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.