BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma survival remains unchanged despite continuing therapeutic innovation. Herein, we aim to (i) develop chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells with a specificity to a unique antigen, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), which is expressed in the hypoxic microenvironment characteristic of glioblastoma, and (ii) demonstrate its efficacy with limited off-target effects. METHODS: First we demonstrated expression of CAIX in patient-derived glioblastoma samples and available databases. CAR T cells were generated against CAIX and efficacy was assessed in 4 glioblastoma cell lines and 2 glioblastoma stem cell lines. Cytotoxicity of anti-CAIX CAR T cells was assessed via interferon gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-2 levels when co-cultured with tumor cells. Finally, we assessed efficacy of direct intratumoral injection of the anti-CAIX CAR T cells on an in vivo xenograft mouse model using the U251 luciferase cell line. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte analyses were performed. RESULTS: We confirm that CAIX is highly expressed in glioblastoma from patients. We demonstrate that CAIX is a suitable target for CAR T-cell therapy using anti-CAIX CAR T cells against glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In our mouse model, a 20% cure rate was observed without detectable systemic effects. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing the specificity of CAIX under hypoxic conditions in glioblastoma and highlighting its efficacy as a target for CAR T-cell therapy, our data suggest that anti-CAIX CAR T may be a promising strategy to treat glioblastoma. Direct intratumoral injection increases anti-CAIX CAR T-cell potency while limiting its off-target effects. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2019.
BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma survival remains unchanged despite continuing therapeutic innovation. Herein, we aim to (i) develop chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells with a specificity to a unique antigen, carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), which is expressed in the hypoxic microenvironment characteristic of glioblastoma, and (ii) demonstrate its efficacy with limited off-target effects. METHODS: First we demonstrated expression of CAIX in patient-derived glioblastoma samples and available databases. CAR T cells were generated against CAIX and efficacy was assessed in 4 glioblastoma cell lines and 2 glioblastoma stem cell lines. Cytotoxicity of anti-CAIXCAR T cells was assessed via interferon gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-2 levels when co-cultured with tumor cells. Finally, we assessed efficacy of direct intratumoral injection of the anti-CAIXCAR T cells on an in vivo xenograft mouse model using the U251 luciferase cell line. Tumor infiltrating lymphocyte analyses were performed. RESULTS: We confirm that CAIX is highly expressed in glioblastoma from patients. We demonstrate that CAIX is a suitable target for CAR T-cell therapy using anti-CAIXCAR T cells against glioblastoma in vitro and in vivo. In our mouse model, a 20% cure rate was observed without detectable systemic effects. CONCLUSIONS: By establishing the specificity of CAIX under hypoxic conditions in glioblastoma and highlighting its efficacy as a target for CAR T-cell therapy, our data suggest that anti-CAIXCAR T may be a promising strategy to treat glioblastoma. Direct intratumoral injection increases anti-CAIXCAR T-cell potency while limiting its off-target effects. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology 2019.
Authors: Ophir Shalem; Neville E Sanjana; Ella Hartenian; Xi Shi; David A Scott; Tarjei Mikkelson; Dirk Heckl; Benjamin L Ebert; David E Root; John G Doench; Feng Zhang Journal: Science Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Laura A Johnson; John Scholler; Takayuki Ohkuri; Akemi Kosaka; Prachi R Patel; Shannon E McGettigan; Arben K Nace; Tzvete Dentchev; Pramod Thekkat; Andreas Loew; Alina C Boesteanu; Alexandria P Cogdill; Taylor Chen; Joseph A Fraietta; Christopher C Kloss; Avery D Posey; Boris Engels; Reshma Singh; Tucker Ezell; Neeraja Idamakanti; Melissa H Ramones; Na Li; Li Zhou; Gabriela Plesa; John T Seykora; Hideho Okada; Carl H June; Jennifer L Brogdon; Marcela V Maus Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christine E Brown; Darya Alizadeh; Renate Starr; Lihong Weng; Jamie R Wagner; Araceli Naranjo; Julie R Ostberg; M Suzette Blanchard; Julie Kilpatrick; Jennifer Simpson; Anita Kurien; Saul J Priceman; Xiuli Wang; Todd L Harshbarger; Massimo D'Apuzzo; Julie A Ressler; Michael C Jensen; Michael E Barish; Mike Chen; Jana Portnow; Stephen J Forman; Behnam Badie Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: James P Hindley; Emma Jones; Kathryn Smart; Hayley Bridgeman; Sarah N Lauder; Beatrice Ondondo; Scott Cutting; Kristin Ladell; Katherine K Wynn; David Withers; David A Price; Ann Ager; Andrew J Godkin; Awen M Gallimore Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Simon J A van Kuijk; Ala Yaromina; Ruud Houben; Raymon Niemans; Philippe Lambin; Ludwig J Dubois Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Jingwen Yao; Chencai Wang; Catalina Raymond; Blake Bergstrom; Xing Chen; Kaveri Das; Huy Dinh; Zoe S Kim; Angela N Le; Matthew W J Lim; Jane A N Pham; Joseph D Prusan; Sriram S Rao; David A Nathanson; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: MAGMA Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Harrison K Chinn; Jennifer L Gardell; Lisa R Matsumoto; Kevin P Labadie; Tara N Mihailovic; Nicole A P Lieberman; Amira Davis; Venu G Pillarisetty; Courtney A Crane Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 12.469
Authors: Jingwen Yao; Akifumi Hagiwara; Catalina Raymond; Soroush Shabani; Whitney B Pope; Noriko Salamon; Albert Lai; Matthew Ji; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 4.379