OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the patterns of e-cigarette use andtheir association with smoking behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based representative cohort of adult smokers who participated in the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Surveys in Mexico. The analytic sample (n=760) was restricted to participants who were followed up from wave 6 (2012) to wave 7 (2014-2015). GEE models regressed e-cigarette use at follow-up and changes in cigarettes per day (CPD) between waves, on baseline sociodemographic variables, smoking status (daily, non-daily, quit), e-cigarette trial, and quit intentions. RESULTS: Smokers who were younger, had a higher income, and had tried e-cigarettes at baseline were more likely to be current e-cigarette users at follow-up. Ecigarette use at follow-up was not associated with a change in CPD over time. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette use does not appear to have promoted smoking cessation or reduction in this sample of Mexican smokers.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the patterns of e-cigarette use andtheir association with smoking behavior. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a population-based representative cohort of adult smokers who participated in the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Surveys in Mexico. The analytic sample (n=760) was restricted to participants who were followed up from wave 6 (2012) to wave 7 (2014-2015). GEE models regressed e-cigarette use at follow-up and changes in cigarettes per day (CPD) between waves, on baseline sociodemographic variables, smoking status (daily, non-daily, quit), e-cigarette trial, and quit intentions. RESULTS: Smokers who were younger, had a higher income, and had tried e-cigarettes at baseline were more likely to be current e-cigarette users at follow-up. Ecigarette use at follow-up was not associated with a change in CPD over time. CONCLUSIONS: E-cigarette use does not appear to have promoted smoking cessation or reduction in this sample of Mexican smokers.
Authors: Lila J Finney Rutten; Kelly D Blake; Amenah A Agunwamba; Rachel A Grana; Patrick M Wilson; Jon O Ebbert; Janet Okamoto; Scott J Leischow Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Katrina A Vickerman; Kelly M Carpenter; Tamara Altman; Chelsea M Nash; Susan M Zbikowski Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Sarah E Adkison; Richard J O'Connor; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Andrew Hyland; Ron Borland; Hua-Hie Yong; K Michael Cummings; Ann McNeill; James F Thrasher; David Hammond; Geoffrey T Fong Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Samir Soneji; Jessica L Barrington-Trimis; Thomas A Wills; Adam M Leventhal; Jennifer B Unger; Laura A Gibson; JaeWon Yang; Brian A Primack; Judy A Andrews; Richard A Miech; Tory R Spindle; Danielle M Dick; Thomas Eissenberg; Robert C Hornik; Rui Dang; James D Sargent Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Kaitlyn M Berry; Lindsay M Reynolds; Jason M Collins; Michael B Siegel; Jessica L Fetterman; Naomi M Hamburg; Aruni Bhatnagar; Emelia J Benjamin; Andrew Stokes Journal: Tob Control Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Rosibel Rodríguez-Bolaños; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Cecilia Guzmán-Rodríguez; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Andrea Titus; Lizeth Cruz-Jiménez; James F Thrasher Journal: LGBT Health Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 4.151
Authors: Katia Gallegos-Carrillo; Inti Barrientos-Gutiérrez; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luis Zavala-Arciniega; Yoo Jin Cho; James F Thrasher Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dorota Kaleta; Mirosław Niedzin; Agnieszka Jankowska; Kinga Polańska Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.390