| Literature DB >> 31275944 |
Achim Lother1,2,3, Christoph Benk4, Dawid L Staudacher1,2, Alexander Supady1,2, Christoph Bode1,2, Tobias Wengenmayer1,2, Daniel Duerschmied1,2.
Abstract
Systemic inflammation is a key characteristic of sepsis but also also in non-infectious conditions such as post-cardiac arrest syndrome. Cytokine adsorption and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation are emerging therapies applied in these critically ill patients, but the experience with their concurrent use is limited. We evaluated cytokine adsorption in critically ill patients requiring support with either veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support and hypothesized that adsorber incorporation into the ECMO circuit was technically feasible and not associated with imminent risk. We analyzed data from the first six cases of a prospective single-center registry of patients undergoing veno-venous (vv) or veno-arterial (va) ECMO therapy. While in most published cases cytokine adsorbers were inserted into a hemofiltration circuit, we directly incorporated the adsorber into the ECMO circuit without interruption of continuous ECMO support. We observed no relevant side effects attributable to cytokine adsorption. Thirty-day mortality was 83% (predicted mortality 87%), indicating that the decision for adding cytokine adsorption may have been considered as an ultima ratio decision in severe cases with poor prognosis. Vasopressor or inotrope use, lactate level, and fluid balance did not change significantly when comparing pre- vs. post-cytokine adsorption values. Interestingly, the real-time course of the mentioned three surrogate parameters remained unaltered in all but two cases, regardless of cytokine removal. Beneficial effects of cytokine adsorption are plausible in two va-ECMO-treated patient, where increasing lactate began to drop after initiation of cytokine adsorption. Taken together, these data suggest that incorporation of cytokine adsorption into the management of critically ill patients requiring continued ECMO support is feasible and easy to handle. Whether cytokine removal improves clinical outcome in ECMO-treated patients should now be investigated in randomized controlled trials.Entities:
Keywords: ECMO; cardiac arrest; cytokine adsorption; inflammation; resuscitation; sepsis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31275944 PMCID: PMC6593298 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Technical implementation of the cytokine adsorber into the ECMO circuit. The CytoSorb adsorber was connected in parallel, placed at the arterial oxygenator outlet via an 3-way stop-cock and was returned into the venous line before the centrifugal pump. Blood flow was measured before and after the 3-way stop-cock in the venous line.
Figure 2Outcome parameters in patients undergoing cytokine adsorption during ECMO therapy. Mean vasopressor or inotropes use (A), mean fluid balance per hour (B) and mean arterial lactate concentration as a surrogate parameter of shock (C) were determined within 24 h before (pre) and after (post) onset of cytokine adsorption. The time courses of vasopressor or inotropes use (D), fluid balance (E) and arterial lactate concentration (F) are depicted from 6 h before to 24 h after onset of cytokine adsorption (dashed line). Levels of procalcitonin in septic patients (G) or interleukin 6 in patients after cardiac arrest (H) were determined during 4 days after onset of cytokine adsorption. Blue circle, case 1; blue square, case 2; blue diamond, case 3; blue triangle, case 4; red circle, case 5; red square, case 6.
Patient characteristics, laboratory findings and outcome.
| Female/male | Female | Female | Male | Male | Male | Male | 2/4 | |
| Years | 44 | 31 | 34 | 68 | 68 | 18 | 43.8 ± 7.6 | |
| ARDS, septic | ARDS, septic | ARDS, septic | Septic shock, | Cardiac arrest, | Cardiac arrest, | |||
| ARDS | shock | shock | shock | cardiac shock | cardiac shock | cardiac shock | 3 (50.0 %) | |
| Septic shock | 4 (66.7 %) | |||||||
| Cardiac arrest | 2 (33.3 %) | |||||||
| Cardiac shock | 3 (50.0 %) | |||||||
| Hemoglobin | g/dl | 8.5 | 8.5 | 5.9 | 9.0 | 8.1 | 13,4 | 8.9 ± 0.9 |
| Leukocytes | 103/μl | 33.0 | 24.0 | 46.5 | 23.9 | 16.2 | 13.0 | 26.1 ± 4.5 |
| Platelets | 103/μl | 106.0 | 29.0 | 69.0 | 114.0 | 148.0 | 230 | 115.0 ± 25.8 |
| Kreatinin | mg/dl | 3.9 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 2.8 ± 0.5 |
| C-reactive protein | mg/l | 284 | 190 | 207 | 125 | 3 | 3 | 135.3 ± 42.6 |
| Creatine kinase | U/l | 1439 | 1895 | 463 | 892 | 1556 | 12889 | 3189.0 ± 1781.1 |
| Myoglobin | mg/ml | 7393 | 8486 | 340 | 3672 | 2689 | 37380 | 9993.3 ± 5125.0 |
| 89.1 | 70.1 | 60.0 | 102.9 | 126.0 | 158.0 | 101.0 ± 13.6 | ||
| 18 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 13 | 12 | 16.3 ± 1.2 | ||
| ven.-ven./ven-art. | ven.-ven. | ven.-ven. | ven.-ven. | ven.-art | ven.-art | ven.-art | 3/3 | |
| Initiation after ECMO onset | Hours | 3.9 | 0.6 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.5 ± 1.1 |
| Treatment duration | Hours | 38.4 | 12.0 | 13.5 | 15.0 | 67.7 | 28.5 | 29.2 ± 8.0 |
| Number of adsorbers | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | |
| ICU mortality | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 (83.3 %) | ||
| 30-days mortality | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | 5/6 (83.3 %) | ||
| Time to mortality | Days | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 20.5 | 3.3 | 5.2 ± 3.4 | |
| Bleeding | Yes | 1/6 (16.7 %) | ||||||
| Secondary infection | Yes | 1/6 (16.7 %) | ||||||
ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ECMO, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; SOFA, sepsis-related organ failure.
Figure 3Indicators for adverse effects of cytokine adsorption during ECMO therapy. Platelet count (A) and international normalized ratio (INR, B) were determined before (pre) and after (post) onset of cytokine adsorption. Blue, septic shock; red, cardiac arrest. Blue circle, case 1; blue square, case 2; blue diamond, case 3; blue triangle, case 4; red circle, case 5; red square, case 6.