| Literature DB >> 31275323 |
Roberta Lotti1, Claudio Giacinto Atene2, Alessandra Marconi1, Giulia Di Rocco2, L Reggiani Bonetti3, Tommaso Zanocco Marani2, Carlo Pincelli1.
Abstract
Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is a life-threatening mucocutaneous autoimmune blistering disease. It is often associated with autoantibodies to the desmosomal adhesion proteins Desmoglein 3 (DSG3) and Desmoglein 1 (DSG1). Recently, auto-antigens, such as desmocollins and others have been described in PV and in atypical pemphigus forms such as Pemphigus Herpetiformis (PH), Pemphigus Vegetans (PVeg), and Paraneoplastic Pemphigus (PP). Desmocollins belong to a cadherin subfamily that provides structure to the desmosomes and play an important role in cell-to-cell adhesion. In order to verify the pathogenic activity of anti-Desmocollin 3 (DSC3) antibodies, we developed an active disease model of pemphigus expressing anti-DSC3 autoantibodies or anti-DSC3 and anti-DSG3 antibodies. This approach included the adoptive transfer of DSC3 and/or DSG3 lymphocytes to Rag2-/- immunodeficient mice that express DSC3 and DSG3. Our results show that the presence of anti-DSC3 auto-antibodies is sufficient to determine the appearance of a pathological phenotype relatable to pemphigus, but with features not completely super-imposable to those observed in the DSG3 active model, suggesting that the DSC3 active model might mimic the atypical pemphigus. Moreover, the presence of both anti-DSC3 and anti-DSG3 antibodies determines a more severe phenotype and a slower response to prednisolone. In conclusion, we have developed an adult DSC3 pemphigus mouse model that differs from the DSG3 model and supports the concept that antigens other than desmogleins may be responsible for different phenotypes in human pemphigus.Entities:
Keywords: autoimmunity; desmocollin-3; desmoglein-3; mouse model; pemphigus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31275323 PMCID: PMC6593104 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01387
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Production of mouse recombinant DSG3 and DSC3 and immunization scheme of mice. (A) Scheme of the recombinant proteins used in this study, i.e., the entire extracellular domains of murine DSG3 (mDSG3, 12) and murine DSC3 (mDSC3) were cloned and linked to 6xHis-Tag. (B) Detection of the recombinant proteins in Sf9 cell lysates by immunoblot analysis using an anti-His-tag monoclonal antibody. Actin was used as loading control. (C) Immunization schemes used for DSC3 breaking tolerance protocol in WT mice and for DSG3 in Dsg3−/− mice. CFA, Complete Freund's Adjuvant; IFA, Incomplete Freund's Adjuvant. (D) Indirect Immunofluorescence of immunized animal sera on WT neonatal mouse skin sections. CNTRL: Serum from animals immunized with non-infected Sf9 cells proteins emulsified in FCA. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Schematic representation of the adoptive transfer protocol in mice.
Summary of the frequency of the phenotypic aspects presented by the three pemphigus mouse models.
| Erosion (1) | Muzzle | 28 | 83 | 78 |
| Periocular region | – | 50 | 33 | |
| Periauricular region | – | 25 | 22 | |
| Back | – | 8 | 11 | |
| Chest | 9 | – | 22 | |
| Abdomen | – | – | – | |
| Right foreleg | 9 | 33 | 22 | |
| Left foreleg | 18 | 25 | 11 | |
| Right hind leg | – | – | 11 | |
| Left hind leg | – | 8 | 11 | |
| Tail | 9 | 58 | 33 | |
| Alopecia | Face (1) | 91 | 100 | 100 |
| Neck (0.5) | 91 | 100 | 100 | |
| Back (1) | 73 | 100 | 56 | |
| Abdomen (0.5) | 100 | 83 | 100 | |
| Erythema (1) | Footpad | 100 | 100 | 56 |
| Abdomen | 91 | 83 | 22 |
In brackets the score for each symptom.
Figure 2Phenotypic, histopathological, and immunological evaluation of the three pemphigus mouse models. (A) Phenotype of active pemphigus mouse models. Mice injected with DSC3 autoreactive splenocytes developed crusted erosions around the snout and cheeks. Intense erythema and patchy hair loss are the main phenotypic aspects. Animals receiving DSC3/DSG3 autoreactive splenocytes exhibit a more severe phenotype, with crusted erosions also on paws, large areas of alopecia and exacerbated erythema. DSG3 animals perfectly reproduce the phenotype formerly published (12). (B) Phenotypic aspects were translated into PV score, weekly evaluation, with an observational period of 63 days after splenocytes transfer into Rag2−/− mice. (n = 7–9 animals). Two-way ANOVA test between treatments is highly significant, P < 0.0001. DSG3/DSG3 vs. CNTRL P = 0.0137, DSG3 vs. CNTRL P = 0.0293, from day 21. DSC3 vs. CNTRL P = 0.0104, from day 35. (C) PV score overtime translated in Area Under the Curve (AUC). One-way ANOVA between treatments, P < 0.0001. All treated animals are significantly different from CNTRL, as shown. Moreover, Unpaired t-test between DSC3 vs. DSC3/DSG3, P = 0.0107. (D) Body weight loss from the baseline (t = 0, splenocytes infusion time) overtime (weekly evaluation, 63 days after splenocytes transfer). DSC3/DSG3 vs. CNTRL P = 0.0479, from day 49. (E) Histologic examination of active mouse models by H&E. Scale bar: 50 μm. (F) Higher histologic magnification of DSC3/DSG3 mouse skin with spongiosis (upper panel), dermal infiltrate (middle panel) and eosinophils (Pagoda Red, lower panel). Scale bar: 50 μm. (G) DSC3 ELISA. Two-way ANOVA between treatments. Only DSC3 and DSC3/DSG3 titers are significantly modulated against CNTRL at each time-point. Moreover, DSC3 is statistically different also vs. DSG3 at each timepoint (P = 0.02). (H) DSG3 ELISA. Two-way ANOVA between treatments. DSC3/DSG3 and DSG3 titers significantly modulated against CNTRL at each timepoint. Moreover, DSC3/DSG3 and DSG3 are significantly different also vs. DSC3 at each timepoint (i.e., P = 0.0004, day 63). *0.05 < p < 0.01; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.0001.
Figure 3Effect of methyl-prednisolone (m-PSL) treatment in the three pemphigus mouse models. m-PSL was administered i.p. daily from day 7 after the adoptive transfer to day 35. Animals were randomly assigned to the m-PSL or PBS (Dil) treatment group (n = 5–7 animals per group). PV score (A–C) and body weight variations (D–F) were reported weekly, till day 63. For DSC3 mouse model: (A) PV score: by multiple t-test at each timepoint, m-PSL is statistically different from Dil at day 14 (P = 0.048), day 35 (P = 0.028), day 42 (P = 0.024) and day 49 (P = 0.021); (D) Body weight loss: no statistically significant differences among m-PSL and Dil group. For DSC3/DSG3 mouse model: (B) PV score: by multiple t-test at each timepoint, m-PSL is statistically different from Dil only at day 14 (P = 0.025); (E) Body weight loss: no statistically significant differences among m-PSL and Dil group. For DSG3 mouse model: (C) PV score and (F) Body weight loss no statistically significant differences among m-PSL and Dil group. (G) PV score overtime translated in Area Under the Curve (AUC). Two-way ANOVA between conditions, P < 0.0001. By Multiple t-test analysis, m-PSL group is statistically different from Dil group only in DSC3 model (P = 0.01). (H) DSC3 and DSG3 ELISA assay. Two-way ANOVA between conditions, P < 0.0001 for DSC3 analysis and P = 0.0076 for DSG3 analysis. In DSC3 ELISA, m-PSL significantly suppressed the production of anti-DSC3 IgG starting from day 28 in DSC3 model, and at day 63 in DSC3/DSG3 mouse model (detailed in Supplementary Figure 3). In DSG3 ELISA, m-PSL significantly suppressed the production of anti-DSG3 IgG at day 63 in DSC3/DSG3 and DSG3 mouse models (detailed in Supplementary Figure 3). *0.05 < p < 0.01; **p < 0.01.