| Literature DB >> 31275280 |
Maozhang He1, Jun Gao1, Jinyuan Wu1, Yunyan Zhou1, Hao Fu1, Shanlin Ke1, Hui Yang1, Congying Chen1, Lusheng Huang1.
Abstract
Gut microbiota regulates host metabolism and immunity. The phylogenetic composition of gut microbiota is influenced by diverse factors that include host gender. In this study, the effects of gender on gut microbial composition and its subsequent influence on serum metabolites in pigs were evaluated. The bacterial composition of feces samples was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in 293 pure-bred Duroc pigs (108 gilts and 185 entire boars) and 64 validated pigs from an eight-breed mosaic F6 population. Twenty-eight F6 boars were castrated at 80 days of age to evaluate the effects of androgen on gut microbial composition. Untargeted serum metabolite features were determined in 45 boars and 26 gilts by an ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF/MS). The study observed an obvious influence of host gender on the gut microbial composition and identified numerous sex-biased bacterial taxa. These included Veillonellaceae, Roseburia, Bulleidia, and Escherichia which showed the higher abundance in boars, and Treponema and Bacteroides which were over-represented in gilts. Castration significantly shifted the fecal microbiota composition of the boars toward that of gilts. The predicted functional pathways of the gut microbiome related to obesity and energy harvest were enriched in gilts, and positively associated with gilt-enriched bacteria. Functional pathways related to peptidases and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in boars and positively associated with boar-enriched bacteria. Serum metabolites related to androgen and cresol metabolism were identified as sex-biased metabolites. Correlation analysis between serum metabolites and sex-biased bacteria identified that the serum concentration of androgen-related metabolites was positively correlated with Bulleidia and Escherichia, but negatively associated with Treponema, suggesting a significant interaction between gut microbiota and host sex hormone metabolism. These results offer basic knowledge of how host gender and gut microbiota influence host metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA gene; gut microbiota; serum metabolome; sex bias; swine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31275280 PMCID: PMC6591444 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Distinct gut microbial compositions between entire boars and gilts in the Duroc pig cohort. (A) Distinct gut microbial compositions identified by Principle coordinates analysis which was performed based on Bray–Curtis distance. (B) Comparison of α-diversity of the fecal microbiota (observed species and Shannon index) between gilts and entire boars. Violin plots show that gilts had the higher richness and diversity of fecal microbiota than entire boars. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001. (C,D) The sex-biased bacterial taxa at the family and genus level. (E) The top 10 biomarkers of OTUs that could discriminate the male and female samples by Random Forest model. Biomarker OTUs were ranked in descending order of importance to the accuracy of the model. (F) Receiver operating curve (ROC) for the Duroc population. The AUC was 79.93% with the 95% CI of 74.67–85.18%.
FIGURE 2Validation of the host gender effect on fecal microbial composition, and the shifts of boar fecal microbiota composition before and after castration in the F6 cohort. (A) PCoA plot based on relative abundance of OTUs showing significant difference of gut microbial composition between entire boars and gilts in the F6 population. (B) PCoA analysis indicates the significant difference of fecal microbial composition before and after castration. Each point represents the fecal microbiota of a sample.
FIGURE 3Significant shifts of gut microbial compositions before and after castration. (A) Comparison of feces microbial compositions among castrated boars, entire boars, and gilts based on the index of observed species and Shannon in F6 pigs. Violin plots show that the richness and diversity of fecal microbiota in castrated boars were closer to gilts. (B,C) The differential bacterial taxa before and after castration at the family and genus level. (D) The sex-biased bacterial genera between entire boars and gilt counterparts were no longer the distinct bacterial genera between castrated boars and gilts. (E) The top 10 biomarkers of OTUs that could discriminate the samples from entire or castrated boars by Random Forest model. Biomarker OTUs were ranked in descending order of importance to the accuracy of the model. (F) Receiver operating curve (ROC) for entire and castrated boars. The AUC value was 98.85% with 95% CI of 97.08–100%.
FIGURE 4The differentiation of host serum metabolite profile between entire boars and gilts, and its associations with sex-biased bacteria in the Duroc pig cohort. (A) sPLS-DA plot of serum metabolite profiles, which indicates the significant differentiation of serum metabolite profiles between entire boars and gilts. (B) Co-occurrence network of serum metabolite features. The metabolites (nodes) are colored according to WGCNA module colors. Only those correlations with | r| > 0.2 between two edges were presented. (C) Correlations between metabolite modules and sex-biased bacteria. Each box of the matrix represents the correlation between one metabolite module and a sex-biased bacterial taxon at the genus level. The correlation coefficient (r) and the corresponding P-value (in brackets) were filled in the small boxes. The color gradient represents the values of correlation coefficients (red for positive correlations and blue for negative correlations).
Metabolites showing distinct abundance between entire boars and gilts.
| Retention time (RT)–m/z | Gilts (mean ± SD) | Entire boars (mean ± SD) | HMDB | Putative compound | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.66_449.2542 m/z | 6.114 ± 24.436 | 136.364 ± 164.545 | 2.61E-08 | 3.06E-05 | HMDB10321 | 3,17-androstanediol glucuronide |
| HMDB10359 | 17-hydroxyandrostane-3-glucuronide | |||||
| HMDB10339 | 3-alpha-androstanediol glucuronide | |||||
| 4.88_369.1737 m/z | 5.989 ± 22.735 | 106.036 ± 119.298 | 5.65E-08 | 4.42E-05 | HMDB02759 | Androsterone sulfate |
| HMDB06278 | 5a-dihydrotestosterone sulfate | |||||
| 4.78_367.1578 m/z | 9.194 ± 35.349 | 94.333 ± 109.472 | 5.95E-07 | 3.49E-04 | HMDB02833 | Testosterone sulfate |
| HMDB01032 | DHEA sulfate | |||||
| 5.13_465.2462 m/z | 2.763 ± 12.00 | 41.119 ± 52.68 | 2.94E-06 | 1.38E-03 | HMDB10365 | 3-alpha-hydroxy-5-alpha-androstane-17-one 3-D-glucuronide |
| HMDB06203 | 5-alpha-Dihydrotestosterone glucuronide | |||||
| HMDB04484 | Etiocholanolone glucuronide | |||||
| HMDB02829 | Androsterone glucuronide | |||||
| 4.61_465.2492 m/z | 6.665 ± 17.311 | 41.547 ± 50.14 | 1.96E-04 | 7.54E-02 | HMDB10365 | 3-alpha-hydroxy-5-alpha-androstane-17-one 3-D-glucuronide |
| HMDB06203 | 5-alpha-Dihydrotestosterone glucuronide | |||||
| HMDB04484 | Etiocholanolone glucuronide | |||||
| HMDB02829 | Androsterone glucuronide | |||||
| 3.64_187.0070 m/z | 1895.955 ± 1301.196 | 846.586 ± 604.482 | 4.06E-04 | 0.12 | HMDB11635 | p-Cresol sulfate |
| 18.19_467.2971 m/z | 481.362 ± 26.737 | 504.372 ± 33.514 | 7.58E-04 | 0.17 | HMDB32521 | Stearyl citrate |
| HMDB39225 | 2-Stearyl citrate | |||||
| 3.64_107.0504 m/z | 109.690 ± 76.958 | 48.810 ± 37.095 | 7.80E-04 | 0.17 | HMDB02055 | o-Cresol |
| HMDB01858 | p-Cresol | |||||
| HMDB02048 | m-Cresol |