| Literature DB >> 31275162 |
Keiichi Yamaguchi1, Nobukazu Kasai1, Daichi Sumi1, Haruka Yatsutani1, Olivier Girard2, Kazushige Goto1.
Abstract
We compared upper limb muscle oxygenation responses during repeated double-poling sprint exercise in normobaric hypoxia and normoxia. Eight male kayakers completed a repeated double-poling sprint exercise (3 × 3 × 20-s maximal sprints, 40-s passive recovery, 5-min rest) in either hypoxia (HYP, FiO2 = 14.5%) or normoxia (NOR, FiO2 = 20.9%). Power output, muscle oxygenation of triceps brachii muscle (using near infrared spectroscopy), arterial oxygen saturation, and cardiorespiratory variables were monitored. Mean power output tended to be lower (-5.2%; P = 0.06) in HYP compared with NOR, while arterial oxygen saturation (82.9 ± 0.9% vs. 90.5 ± 0.8%) and systemic oxygen uptake (1936 ± 140 vs. 2408 ± 83 mL⋅min-1) values were lower (P < 0.05). Exercise-induced increases in deoxygenated hemoglobin (241.7 ± 46.9% vs. 175.8 ± 27.2%) and total hemoglobin (138.0 ± 18.1% vs. 112.1 ± 6.7%) were greater in HYP in reference to NOR (P < 0.05). Despite moderate hypoxia exacerbating exercise-induced elevation in blood perfusion of active upper limb musculature, power output during repeated double-poling exercise only tended to be lower.Entities:
Keywords: double-poling; hypoxia; muscle oxygenation; repeated sprints; upper limb
Year: 2019 PMID: 31275162 PMCID: PMC6591374 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Protocol overview.
FIGURE 2Changes in peak (A) and mean power outputs (B) during repeated double-poling exercise. Values are means ± SE. ∗P < 0.05 vs. sprint 1.
FIGURE 3Changes in triceps brachii muscle deoxygenated hemoglobin (A) and total hemoglobin (B) during repeated double-poling exercise. Values are means ± SE. ∗P < 0.05 vs. Pre. †P < 0.05 HYP vs. NOR.
Oxygen uptake (O2), carbon dioxide production (CO2), minute ventilation (E), tidal volume (TV), and respiratory rate (RR) during double-poling sprint exercise.
| Setl | Set 2 | Set 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hypoxia | 1995 ± 149† | 1908 ± 135† | 1903 ± 159 |
| Normoxia | 2455 ± 109 | 2444 ± 61 | 2326 ± 105 |
| Hypoxia | 2758 ± 142 | 2321 ± 124† | 2209 ± 112 |
| Normoxia | 2865 ± 144 | 2520 ± 77 | 2364 ± 113 |
| Hypoxia | 126.6 ± 11.2† | 121.6 ± 9.4 | 126.2 ± 10.7 |
| Normoxia | 115.9 ± 11.2 | 120.8 ± 7.2 | 120.3 ± 9.5 |
| TV (mL⋅breath-1) | |||
| Hypoxia | 1699 ± 80 | 1728 ± 62 | 1635 ± 62 |
| Normoxia | 1579 ± 90 | 1593 ± 50 | 1556 ± 33 |
| RR (breaths⋅min-1) | |||
| Hypoxia | 75 ± 6 | 77 ± 5 | 77 ± 5 |
| Normoxia | 76 ± 7 | 77 ± 5 | 78 ± 26 |
Blood glucose and blood lactate concentrations during double-poling sprint exercise.
| Pre | Set l | Set 2 | Set 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose (mg⋅dL-1) | ||||
| Hypoxia | 90 ± 1 | 98 ± 3 | 113 ± 4∗ | 119 ± 6∗ |
| Normoxia | 91 ± 1 | 94 ± 2 | 107 ± 3∗ | 115 ± 8∗ |
| Lactate (mmol⋅L-1) | ||||
| Hypoxia | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 12.6 ± 1.6∗ | 14.2 ± 1.8∗ | 16.9 ± 1.6∗ |
| Normoxia | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 11.2 ± 1.1∗ | 12.9 ± 1.3∗ | 14.7 ± 1.3∗ |