Literature DB >> 31274897

Targeted phenolic profiling of Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz grapes grown in two regions of India by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Kavita Savalekar1,2, T P Ahammed Shabeer1, Zareen Khan1, Dasharath Oulkar1, Prachi Jain1, Chanchal Patil1, Kaushik Banerjee1.   

Abstract

The phenolic compounds play an important role in production of quality grapes and wines. The current investigation focused on optimization of an extraction method for targeted analysis of 33 phenolic compounds in grapes by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The optimized method was successfully used for phenolic profiling of two wine grape varieties, Sauvignon blanc (white) and Shiraz (red) originated from Pune and Nasik regions of Maharashtra State, India. The optimized sample preparation procedure involved liquid-liquid extraction with acidified methanol by vortexing for 2 min followed by analysis on LC-MS/MS. The limit of quantification of the targeted compounds was in the range of 29 to 411 µg/L. The results indicated that skin of both varieties contained the highest amount of flavonols (69.47 ± 14.74 mg/kg in Sauvignon blanc and 129.47 ± 10.05 mg/kg in Shiraz) compared to pulp. The highest amounts of flavan-3-ols were present in grape seed collected from the Pune region (2016.84 ± 14.73 mg/kg in Sauvignon blanc and 1945.06 ± 32.69 mg/kg in Shiraz). The concentration of stilbenes was the highest in grape skin (0.13 ± 0.52 to 5.78 ± 5.45 mg/kg) compared to seed and pulp of both varities. Hydroxybenzoic acid (vanillin), hydroxycinnamic acid (p-coumaric acid) and anthocyanins (oenin, malvidin, cyanidin and kuromanin) were found only in Shiraz variety. The results of antioxidant activity (FRAP and DPPH assay) indicated the highest scavenging activity in seed (978.64 ± 56.23 to1133.38 ± 143.65 µMol TE/g DW FRAP and 594.93 ± 37.94 to 631.94 ± 56.45 µMol TE/g DW in DPPH). The phenolic contents in Sauvignon blanc and Shiraz grapes between Pune and Nasik regions did not have any significant difference.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antioxidant activity; Grape; LC–MS/MS; Phenolic profile; Sauvignon blanc; Shiraz

Year:  2019        PMID: 31274897      PMCID: PMC6582198          DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03802-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Sci Technol        ISSN: 0022-1155            Impact factor:   2.701


  13 in total

1.  Effect of principal polyphenolic components in relation to antioxidant characteristics of aged red wines.

Authors:  A Arnous; D P Makris; P Kefalas
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 2.  Extraction and analysis of phenolics in food.

Authors:  Marian Naczk; Fereidoon Shahidi
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2004-10-29       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 3.  Updated knowledge about the presence of phenolic compounds in wine.

Authors:  María Monagas; Begoña Bartolomé; Carmen Gómez-Cordovés
Journal:  Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.176

Review 4.  Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Ilja C W Arts; Peter C H Hollman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Transport and accumulation of flavonoids in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.).

Authors:  Enrico Braidot; Marco Zancani; Elisa Petrussa; Carlo Peresson; Alberto Bertolini; Sonia Patui; Francesco Macrì; Angelo Vianello
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-09

6.  Flavonoids and antioxidant capacity of Georgia-grown Vidalia onions.

Authors:  Subramani Sellappan; Casimir C Akoh
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2002-09-11       Impact factor: 5.279

7.  Ripening and genotype control stilbene accumulation in healthy grapes.

Authors:  Pamela Gatto; Urska Vrhovsek; Jost Muth; Cinzia Segala; Chiara Romualdi; Paolo Fontana; Dirk Pruefer; Marco Stefanini; Claudio Moser; Fulvio Mattivi; Riccardo Velasco
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 5.279

8.  Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of muscadine grapes.

Authors:  Eduardo Pastrana-Bonilla; Casimir C Akoh; Subramani Sellappan; Gerard Krewer
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 9.  Berry phenolics of grapevine under challenging environments.

Authors:  António Teixeira; José Eiras-Dias; Simone D Castellarin; Hernâni Gerós
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Phenolic compound profiles in berry skins from nine red wine grape cultivars in northwest China.

Authors:  Zan-Min Jin; Jian-Jun He; He-Qiong Bi; Xiang-Yun Cui; Chang-Qing Duan
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Putrescine with Aloe vera gel coating improves bioactive compounds and quality of table grape under cold storage.

Authors:  Abdollah Ehtesham Nia; Shirin Taghipour; Sara Siahmansour
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Microencapsulation by Spray Drying and Antioxidant Activity of Phenolic Compounds from Tucuma Coproduct (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart.) Almonds.

Authors:  Lindalva Maria de Meneses Costa Ferreira; Rayanne Rocha Pereira; Fernanda Brito de Carvalho-Guimarães; Myrth Soares do Nascimento Remígio; Wagner Luiz Ramos Barbosa; Roseane Maria Ribeiro-Costa; José Otávio Carréra Silva-Júnior
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.967

Review 3.  Chemical Diversity of Flavan-3-Ols in Grape Seeds: Modulating Factors and Quality Requirements.

Authors:  Guillermo F Padilla-González; Esther Grosskopf; Nicholas J Sadgrove; Monique S J Simmonds
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.