Literature DB >> 31274652

Computer Vision Analysis of Intraoperative Video: Automated Recognition of Operative Steps in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Daniel A Hashimoto1,2, Guy Rosman1,3, Elan R Witkowski1,2, Caitlin Stafford1, Allison J Navarette-Welton1, David W Rattner2, Keith D Lillemoe2, Daniela L Rus3, Ozanan R Meireles1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To develop and assess AI algorithms to identify operative steps in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).
BACKGROUND: Computer vision, a form of artificial intelligence (AI), allows for quantitative analysis of video by computers for identification of objects and patterns, such as in autonomous driving.
METHODS: Intraoperative video from LSG from an academic institution was annotated by 2 fellowship-trained, board-certified bariatric surgeons. Videos were segmented into the following steps: 1) port placement, 2) liver retraction, 3) liver biopsy, 4) gastrocolic ligament dissection, 5) stapling of the stomach, 6) bagging specimen, and 7) final inspection of staple line. Deep neural networks were used to analyze videos. Accuracy of operative step identification by the AI was determined by comparing to surgeon annotations.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight cases of LSG were analyzed. A random 70% sample of these clips was used to train the AI and 30% to test the AI's performance. Mean concordance correlation coefficient for human annotators was 0.862, suggesting excellent agreement. Mean (±SD) accuracy of the AI in identifying operative steps in the test set was 82% ± 4% with a maximum of 85.6%.
CONCLUSIONS: AI can extract quantitative surgical data from video with 85.6% accuracy. This suggests operative video could be used as a quantitative data source for research in intraoperative clinical decision support, risk prediction, or outcomes studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31274652     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

Review 1.  A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Athanasios G Pantelis; Georgios K Stravodimos; Dimitris P Lapatsanis
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 2.  [Technical innovations and future perspectives].

Authors:  M Wagner; A Schulze; S Bodenstedt; L Maier-Hein; S Speidel; F Nickel; F Berlth; B P Müller-Stich; Peter Grimminger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Multicentric validation of EndoDigest: a computer vision platform for video documentation of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Pietro Mascagni; Deepak Alapatt; Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca; Ludovica Guerriero; Andrea Spota; Claudio Fiorillo; Armine Vardazaryan; Giuseppe Quero; Sergio Alfieri; Ludovica Baldari; Elisa Cassinotti; Luigi Boni; Diego Cuccurullo; Guido Costamagna; Bernard Dallemagne; Nicolas Padoy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  [ICG lymph node mapping in cancer surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  Dolores Müller; Raphael Stier; Jennifer Straatman; Benjamin Babic; Lars Schiffmann; Jennifer Eckhoff; Thomas Schmidt; Christiane Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Chirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-03

5.  Surgomics: personalized prediction of morbidity, mortality and long-term outcome in surgery using machine learning on multimodal data.

Authors:  Martin Wagner; Johanna M Brandenburg; Sebastian Bodenstedt; André Schulze; Alexander C Jenke; Antonia Stern; Marie T J Daum; Lars Mündermann; Fiona R Kolbinger; Nithya Bhasker; Gerd Schneider; Grit Krause-Jüttler; Hisham Alwanni; Fleur Fritz-Kebede; Oliver Burgert; Dirk Wilhelm; Johannes Fallert; Felix Nickel; Lena Maier-Hein; Martin Dugas; Marius Distler; Jürgen Weitz; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Decision analysis and reinforcement learning in surgical decision-making.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Amanda C Filiberto; Yanjun Li; Jeremy Balch; Allyson C Cook; Patrick J Tighe; Philip A Efron; Gilbert R Upchurch; Parisa Rashidi; Xiaolin Li; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  [New techniques and training methods for robot-assisted surgery and cost-benefit analysis of Ivor Lewis esophagectomy].

Authors:  Alexander Urbanski; Benjamin Babic; Wolfgang Schröder; Lars Schiffmann; Dolores T Müller; Christiane J Bruns; Hans F Fuchs
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  Performance assessment using sensor technology.

Authors:  Hossein Mohamadipanah; Brett Wise; Anna Witt; Cassidi Goll; Su Yang; Calvin Perumalla; Kayla Huemer; LaDonna Kearse; Carla Pugh
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.885

9.  Surgical Sabermetrics: Applying Athletics Data Science to Enhance Operative Performance.

Authors:  Steven Yule; Allison Janda; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  Ann Surg Open       Date:  2021-03-29

10.  Object and anatomical feature recognition in surgical video images based on a convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Yoshiko Bamba; Shimpei Ogawa; Michio Itabashi; Hironari Shindo; Shingo Kameoka; Takahiro Okamoto; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.