Vlasta Dostalova1, Jitka Schreiberova1, Michael Bartos2, Lucie Kukralova1, Pavel Dostal3. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. 3. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic - pavel.dostal@fnhk.cz.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Surgical Plethysmographic Index (SPI) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) have been suggested for the non-invasive intraoperative monitoring of nociception/anti-nociception balance. We aimed to compare patterns of intraoperative use of opioids, postoperative cortisol levels and postoperative pain scores after intraoperative analgesia guided either by ANI, SPI or anaesthesiologist's judgment. MATERIAL AND METHODS:Seventy two adult ASA I - III patients scheduled for elective neurosurgical spinal procedures were randomized into the ANI group, SPI group and control group. Anaesthesia and intraoperative use of opioids (sufentanil boluses based on body weight) were managed according to a strict protocol. The use of sufentanil was targeted to keep ANI value 50 - 70 in the ANI group, SPI value below individual postinduction baseline value plus 10 points in the SPI group. In the control group, the use of opioids was left at anaesthesiologist's discretion. RESULTS: Additional sufentanil boluses were administered earlier in the ANI and SPI groups in comparison to the control group (3rd dose after 51.8 ± 22.1 vs 52.7 ± 14.8 vs 84.5 ± 24.8 min respectively, p = 0.001; 4th dose after 61.3 ± 30.1 vs 57.2 ± 14.1 vs 120.0 ± 26.2 min, p = 0.003, and 5th dose after 78.8 ± 33.7 vs 74.0 ± 11.6 vs 146.7 ± 23.2 min respectively, p = 0.009). There were no differences in postoperative cortisol levels, time to spontaneous breathing at the end of anaesthesia and postoperative pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Both ANI and SPI guidance significantly modified intraoperative opiod use, but no modification of postoperative cortisol levels and postoperative pain was observed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The Surgical Plethysmographic Index (SPI) and the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) have been suggested for the non-invasive intraoperative monitoring of nociception/anti-nociception balance. We aimed to compare patterns of intraoperative use of opioids, postoperative cortisol levels and postoperative pain scores after intraoperative analgesia guided either by ANI, SPI or anaesthesiologist's judgment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy two adult ASA I - III patients scheduled for elective neurosurgical spinal procedures were randomized into the ANI group, SPI group and control group. Anaesthesia and intraoperative use of opioids (sufentanil boluses based on body weight) were managed according to a strict protocol. The use of sufentanil was targeted to keep ANI value 50 - 70 in the ANI group, SPI value below individual postinduction baseline value plus 10 points in the SPI group. In the control group, the use of opioids was left at anaesthesiologist's discretion. RESULTS: Additional sufentanil boluses were administered earlier in the ANI and SPI groups in comparison to the control group (3rd dose after 51.8 ± 22.1 vs 52.7 ± 14.8 vs 84.5 ± 24.8 min respectively, p = 0.001; 4th dose after 61.3 ± 30.1 vs 57.2 ± 14.1 vs 120.0 ± 26.2 min, p = 0.003, and 5th dose after 78.8 ± 33.7 vs 74.0 ± 11.6 vs 146.7 ± 23.2 min respectively, p = 0.009). There were no differences in postoperative cortisol levels, time to spontaneous breathing at the end of anaesthesia and postoperative pain scores. CONCLUSIONS: Both ANI and SPI guidance significantly modified intraoperative opiod use, but no modification of postoperative cortisol levels and postoperative pain was observed.