Literature DB >> 31273486

Cesarean delivery to prevent anal incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

R L Nelson1, C Go2, R Darwish2, J Gao2, R Parikh2, C Kang2, A Mahajan2, L Habeeb2, P Zalavadiya2, M Patnam2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cesarean delivery (CD), is increasingly recommended as a mode of delivery that prevents the anal incontinence (AI) that arises in some women after vaginal delivery (VD). The assessment of the efficacy of CD in this regard was the subject of this systematic review.
METHODS: Searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. Both randomized (RCTs) and non-randomized trials (NRTs) comparing the risk of sustained fecal and/or flatus incontinence after VD or CD were sought from 1966 to 1 January, 2019. Studies were eligible if they assessed AI more than 6 months after birth, and had statistical adjustment for at least one of the three major confounders for AI: age, maternal weight or parity. In addition, each study was required to contain more than 250 participants, more than 50 CDs and more than 25 cases of AI. Data after screening and selection were abstracted and entered into Revman for meta-analysis. Analyses were done for combined fecal and flatus incontinence (comAI), fecal incontinence (FI), gas incontinence (GI), CD before or during labor, time trend of incontinence after delivery, assessment of both statistical and clinical heterogeneity, parity and late incident AI.
RESULTS: Out of the 2526 titles and abstracts found, 24 eligible studies were analyzed, 23 NRTs and one RCT. These included women with 29,597 VDs and women with 6821 CDs. Among the primary outcomes, VD was found not to be a significant predictor of postpartum comAI compared to CD in 6 studies, incorporating 18,951 deliveries (OR = 0.74; 0.54-1.02). VD was also not a significant predictor of FI in 14 studies, incorporating 29,367 deliveries, (OR = 0.89; 0.76-1.05). VD was not a significant predictor of GI in six studies, incorporating 6724 deliveries (OR = 0.96; 0.79-1.18). The strength of the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluations (GRADE) evidence for each of these was low for comAI and moderate for FI and GI (upgrade for lack of expected effect). Time trend FI showed incontinence at 3 months often resolved at 1 year. Other secondary analyses assessing parity, delayed incidence of FI, clinical and statistical heterogeneity, spontaneous VD only, late risk of incidence of AI, and CD in or prior to labor all had similar results as in the primary outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: There are three components of pelvic floor dysfunction that are thought to be caused by VD and hopefully prevented by CD: AI, urinary incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Of these, AI was not found to be reliably prevented by CD in this review.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Delivery; Fecal incontinence; Fecal incontinence/prevention and control; Female; Flatulence; Flatulence/prevention and control; Humans; Obstetric; Obstetric/adverse effects; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31273486     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-019-02029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  69 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

Review 2.  Inappropriate use of randomised trials to evaluate complex phenomena: case study of vaginal breech delivery.

Authors:  Andrew Kotaska
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

3.  Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations.

Authors:  R Nelson; S Furner; V Jesudason
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Long-term results of anterior anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence due to obstetric injury / with invited commentaries.

Authors:  J Rothbarth; W A Bemelman; W J Meijerink; M E Buyze-Westerweel; J G van Dijk; J B Delemarre
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.588

5.  Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women.

Authors:  J P Zetterström; A López; B Anzén; A Dolk; M Norman; A Mellgren
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-04

Review 6.  Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review.

Authors:  S J Pretlove; P J Thompson; P M Toozs-Hobson; S Radley; K S Khan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy.

Authors:  X Fritel; J P Schaal; A Fauconnier; V Bertrand; C Levet; A Pigné
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Factors affecting Taiwanese women's choice of Cesarean section.

Authors:  Kuang-Hung Hsu; Pei-Ju Liao; Chorng-Jer Hwang
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair.

Authors:  Amy L Halverson; Tracy L Hull
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014.

Authors:  Ana Pilar Betrán; Jianfeng Ye; Anne-Beth Moller; Jun Zhang; A Metin Gülmezoglu; Maria Regina Torloni
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

2.  Postpartum anal incontinence in women with and without obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Rebecca Everist; Madeline Burrell; Kylie-Ann Mallitt; Katrina Parkin; Vicki Patton; Emmanuel Karantanis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Pelvic floor: vaginal or caesarean delivery? A review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Ana Isabel López-López; Javier Sanz-Valero; Luis Gómez-Pérez; Maria Pastor-Valero
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.