| Literature DB >> 31273265 |
Jihye Kim1, Jang-Han Bae2, Boncho Ku1, Mi Hong Yim1, Lin Ang3,4, Hyunho Kim5, Young Ju Jeon6.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare radial pulse characteristics between primary dysmenorrhea (PD) patients and healthy subjects throughout the menstrual cycle. A total of 48 females aged 20 to 29 years participated, and all subjects were assigned to two groups according to their visual analogue scale scores. The radial pulse of each subject was obtained using a pulse tonometric device during menstrual, follicular, and luteal phases. In addition, various pulse analysis indices were used to estimate the pulse characteristics. The pulse tension index (PTI) and pulse depth index (PDI) in the patient group were significantly lower than those in the healthy group during the menstrual phase (P < 0.01 and <0.001, respectively). According to univariate logistic regression results, the PTI, PDI and optimal applied pressure (OAP) were significantly correlated with PD, and the model based on the PTI and OAP performed best (AUC = 0.828). This study is the first to analyze pulse tension inferred from the PTI and to apply this parameter to clinical practice. The results of this study confirmed the possibility of quantitatively measuring pulse tension and suggest that the PTI and OAP can serve as potential clinical indicators for pain disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31273265 PMCID: PMC6609770 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46066-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Baseline characteristics of the study participants.
| Healthy subjects | PD patients | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 24 (51.1%) | 23 (48.9%) | |
| Age (year) | 22.9 ± 1.6 | 23.5 ± 2.5 | 0.324 |
|
| |||
| Height (cm) | 160.6 ± 4.4 | 162.3 ± 4.0 | 0.161 |
| Weight (kg) | 52.9 ± 6.1 | 54.9 ± 4.9 | 0.223 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 20.5 ± 2.3 | 20.8 ± 1.7 | 0.591 |
|
| |||
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 111.2 ± 10.0 | 106.5 ± 9.3 | 0.103 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 73.8 ± 7.8 | 72.5 ± 7.1 | 0.562 |
| Pulse rate (beats per minute) | 74.2 ± 19.5 | 72.3 ± 8.2 | 0.663 |
|
| |||
| Caffeine (cups per day) | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 0.6 | 0.434 |
| Alcohol (cups per day) | 0.4 ± 0.4 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 0.100 |
|
| |||
| Age at menarche (year) | 12.9 ± 1.5 | 13.0 ± 2.6 | 0.896 |
| Menstrual cycle (days) | 29.5 ± 1.6 | 29.0 ± 1.6 | 0.299 |
| Duration of menstruation (days) | 5.1 ± 1.1 | 5.8 ± 2.3 | 0.201 |
|
| |||
| Maximum VAS score before the visit | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 6.4 ± 1.4 | 0.000 |
| MMP score | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 0.000 |
| CMSS score (duration) | 9.0 ± 6.4 | 25.9 ± 10.2 | 0.000 |
| CMSS score (magnitude) | 7.2 ± 4.9 | 20.6 ± 6.2 | 0.000 |
|
| |||
| Stagnation of | — | 22 (95.7%) | |
| Deficiency of | — | 1 (4.3%) | |
Continuous variables are summarized as the mean and standard deviation, and categorical variables are summarized as the frequency and proportion. P-values were derived from independent two-sample t-tests between healthy subjects and PD patients. BP: blood pressure; VAS: visual analogue scale; MMP: measurement of menstrual pain; CMSS: Cox menstrual symptom scale.
Figure 1Estimated distributions of the radial pulse indices according to menstrual periods and measured locations.
The estimated marginal means of the PPI, PDI, and OAP at each menstrual phase and the differences between the PD patient and healthy subject groups (n = 46).
| Variable | Menstrual phase | Healthy subjects | PD patients | Mean difference | Effect size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPI | Menstrual | 1.92 (1.76, 2.08) | 2.02 (1.86, 2.18) | 0.10 (−0.13, 0.32) | 0.24 |
| Follicular | 2.01 (1.85, 2.16) | 2.00 (1.84, 2.16) | −0.01 (−0.24, 0.22) | 0.03 | |
| Luteal | 2.08 (1.92, 2.24) | 2.04 (1.88, 2.20) | −0.04 (−0.27, 0.19) | 0.10 | |
| PDI |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 10.36 (9.80, 10.92) | 9.30 (8.73, 9.87) | −1.06* (−1.88, −0.24) | 0.76 | |
| Luteal | 10.11 (9.54, 10.68) | 9.19 (8.62, 9.76) | −0.92* (−1.74, −0.10) | 0.65 | |
| OAP | Menstrual | 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) | 0.66 (0.57, 0.74) | −0.11^ (−0.22, 0.01) | 0.54 |
| Follicular | 0.82 (0.74, 0.90) | 0.66 (0.58, 0.74) | −0.16** (−0.28, −0.05) | 0.81 | |
| Luteal | 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) | 0.72 (0.64, 0.80) | −0.04 (−0.16, 0.07) | 0.22 |
Each value represents the estimated marginal mean and (95% CI) obtained by linear mixed effect models for each variable adjusted for age, BMI, systolic BP, pulse, and caffeine and alcohol consumption per day. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ^P < 0.10.
The estimated marginal means and group differences for the PTIs at each menstrual phase (n = 46).
| Variable | Menstrual phase | Healthy subjects | PD patients | Mean difference | Effect size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTI20 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 2.84 (2.51, 3.17) | 2.71 (2.38, 3.05) | −0.12 (−0.61, 0.36) | 0.15 | |
| Luteal | 2.81 (2.47, 3.15) | 2.64 (2.30, 2.98) | −0.17 (−0.65, 0.32) | 0.20 | |
| PTI30 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 2.44 (2.13, 2.76) | 2.22 (1.90, 2.55) | −0.22 (−0.68, 0.24) | 0.27 | |
| Luteal | 2.31 (1.98, 2.63) | 2.19 (1.87, 2.51) | −0.12 (−0.58, 0.34) | 0.15 | |
| PTI50 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 1.60 (1.37, 1.84) | 1.47 (1.22, 1.71) | −0.14 (−0.49, 0.21) | 0.23 | |
| Luteal | 1.59 (1.35, 1.84) | 1.43 (1.18, 1.67) | −0.17 (−0.51, 0.18) | 0.28 | |
| PTI70 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 1.08 (0.89, 1.26) | 0.92 (0.74, 1.11) | −0.15 (−0.42, 0.11) | 0.33 | |
| Luteal | 1.01 (0.82, 1.19) | 0.92 (0.74, 1.11) | −0.09 (−0.35, 0.18) | 0.18 | |
| PTI80 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 0.68 (0.51, 0.85) | 0.62 (0.45, 0.80) | −0.06 (−0.30, 0.19) | 0.14 | |
| Luteal | 0.75 (0.58, 0.92) | 0.69 (0.52, 0.87) | −0.06 (−0.30, 0.19) | 0.14 | |
| PTI90 |
| ( | ( | − (− | |
| Follicular | 0.39 (0.27, 0.52) | 0.36 (0.24, 0.49) | −0.03 (−0.21, 0.15) | 0.09 | |
| Luteal | 0.47 (0.34, 0.60) | 0.31 (0.19, 0.44) | −0.16^ (−0.34, 0.02) | 0.51 |
All details in the table are identical to those in Table 1. ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; ^P < 0.10.
Figure 2The area under the ROC curve for each radial artery pulse index for PD status based on the univariate logistic regression results. Error bars for each AUC value within the shaded region indicate the 95% confidence interval for the AUC of each index, which was derived from DeLong’s method. The black and red dashed lines indicate the AUC values of 0.5 and 0.7, respectively.
Likelihood ratio tests for the multiple logistic regression results for PD status using different radial pulse indices.
| Model | Description | −2LL | AIC | df | Δ-2LL | Test | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | y ~ PPI + PDI + OAP + PTI70 | 43.137 | 53.137 | 42 | |||
| Model 2 | y ~ PDI + OAP + PTI70 | 43.476 | 51.476 | 43 | −0.340 | 1 vs. 2 | 0.560 |
| Model 3 | y ~ PDI + PTI70 | 51.361 | 57.361 | 44 | −8.225 | 1 vs. 3 | 0.016 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 3ROC curves of the predicted probabilities for each multiple logistic regression model based on leave-one-out cross validation. The 95% CIs of the AUCs for each model were estimated using DeLong’s method.
Analysis indices used in this study.
| Index | Definition (unit) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PPI | Pulse pressure index (V) | Voltage response upon reaching the maximum pulse amplitude, which is the largest value between the starting point and peak point of each pulse signal |
| PDI | Pulse depth index (mm) | Sensor displacement from the point of contact with the skin surface to the maximum pulse amplitude point |
| PTIx | Pulse tension index (mm) | Sensor displacement between the maximum pulse amplitude point and the starting points with greater than x percentage of the maximum pulse amplitude (x = 20, 30, 50, 70, 80, 90) |
| OAP | Optimal applied pressure (V) | The applied pressure at which the pulse amplitude reaches its maximum |
Figure 4The pulse pressure and applied pressure signal with the analysis indices.