Literature DB >> 31272937

Effect of fellow involvement on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Georgios Tziatzios1, Paraskevas Gkolfakis1, Konstantinos Triantafyllou2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The effect of fellow involvement on colonoscopy outcomes is controversial. Thus, we evaluated this effect on adenoma detection rate (ADR) and on other colonoscopy quality indicators.
METHODS: MEDLINE and Cochrane central register of controlled trials were searched up to September 2018 for studies evaluating fellow-involved colonoscopies vs. attending physicians-only examinations in terms of colonoscopy outcomes. Primary outcome was ADR, while advanced ADR (AADR), mean number of adenomas per colonoscopy (MAC), cecum intubation rate (CIR) and adverse events rate comprised the secondary outcomes. The effect size on study outcomes was calculated using random-effects model and it is presented as Odds Ratio (OR) or Mean Difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS: Nineteen observational studies involving 34,059 patients (fellow-involved 16,875, attending physician-only 17,184) were included. Compared to the attending physician-only group, fellow involvement marginally increased ADR [OR (95%CI) = 1.12 (1.00-1.26); p = 0.06, I2 = 76%]. Attending physicians with low-to-moderate ADR (<35%) benefited most from fellow's participation [OR (95%CI): 1.26 (1.13-1.40) vs. 1.12 (1.00-1.26); p = 0.03 when ADR < 35% and OR (95%CI): 1.29 (1.13-1.46) vs. 0.95 (0.78-1.16); p = 0.01 when ADR < 30%, respectively]. Moreover, fellow-involved group had higher MAC compared to attending-only group [MD (95%CI) = 0.12 (0.04-0.20); p = 0.002, I2 = 53%]. No benefit from fellow involvement was detected either for AADR, CIR or adverse events rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Fellow involvement during colonoscopy is associated with more adenomas detected per procedure and with higher ADR when the attending physician-only group ADR is less than 35%.
Copyright © 2019 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenoma; Attending; Colonoscopy; Detection; Fellow

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31272937     DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Liver Dis        ISSN: 1590-8658            Impact factor:   4.088


  4 in total

1.  Adoption of Optimal Small (6-9 mm) Colorectal Polyp Resection Technique Over Time.

Authors:  Larissa Muething; Bill Quach; Derek E Smith; Dexiang Gao; Joshua A Smith; Robert T Simril; Amanda Tompkins; Jeannine Espinoza; Michelle L Cowan; Hazem Hammad; Sachin Wani; Swati G Patel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: The Current Status and Future Perspective.

Authors:  Sebastian Manuel Milluzzo; Paola Cesaro; Leonardo Minelli Grazioli; Nicola Olivari; Cristiano Spada
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2021-01-13

3.  Computer aided detection for laterally spreading tumors and sessile serrated adenomas during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Guanyu Zhou; Xun Xiao; Mengtian Tu; Peixi Liu; Dan Yang; Xiaogang Liu; Renyi Zhang; Liangping Li; Shan Lei; Han Wang; Yan Song; Pu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Retroflexion, a costless endoscopic maneuver, increases adenoma detection rate in the ascending colon.

Authors:  Spyridon Michopoulos; Georgios Axiaris; Panagiotis Baxevanis; Maria Stoupaki; Vassiliki Gkagkari; Georgios Leonidakis; Evanthia Zampeli; Maria Sotiropoulou; Kalliopi Petraki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-10-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.