Literature DB >> 31272885

Stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment require new ways of thinking.

Richard Hooper1, Andrew Copas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: There is substantial variation in the design of stepped wedge trials. Many recruit participants continuously over time, although the methodological literature has tended not to differentiate closely between continuous recruitment and discrete sampling. We argue for a deeper understanding of the special features of stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: This is a commentary and informal review.
RESULTS: We discuss the scheduling of recruitment and implementation in continuous time and how contamination might be avoided. We also offer some suggestions on reporting and terminology for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and comment on issues for analysis.
CONCLUSION: Repeated cross-section and continuous recruitment stepped wedge trials are not the same thing. More work is needed to develop the theory and practice of stepped wedge designs with continuous recruitment. Thoughtful approaches to design and clarity of reporting are vital.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster randomized trials; Contamination; Continuous recruitment; Interrupted time series; Stepped wedge

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31272885     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  10 in total

1.  How to "Start Small and Just Keep Moving Forward": Mixed Methods Results From a Stepped-Wedge Trial to Support Evidence-Based Processes in Local Health Departments.

Authors:  Rebekah R Jacob; Renee G Parks; Peg Allen; Stephanie Mazzucca; Yan Yan; Sarah Kang; Debra Dekker; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-28

2.  Marginal modeling of cluster-period means and intraclass correlations in stepped wedge designs with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Fan Li; Hengshi Yu; Paul J Rathouz; Elizabeth L Turner; John S Preisser
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Sample size and power calculations for open cohort longitudinal cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Jessica Kasza; Richard Hooper; Andrew Copas; Andrew B Forbes
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Implementation of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate a hospital mobility program.

Authors:  Susan N Hastings; Karen M Stechuchak; Ashley Choate; Elizabeth P Mahanna; Courtney Van Houtven; Kelli D Allen; Virginia Wang; Nina Sperber; Leah Zullig; Hayden B Bosworth; Cynthia J Coffman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 5.  Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.

Authors:  Fan Li; James P Hughes; Karla Hemming; Monica Taljaard; Edward R Melnick; Patrick J Heagerty
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Effects of Implementing the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for Mechanical Restraint in a Forensic Male Population: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Design.

Authors:  Jacob Hvidhjelm; Mette Brandt-Christensen; Christian Delcomyn; Jette Møllerhøj; Volkert Siersma; Jesper Bak
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study.

Authors:  Jennifer F Bobb; Hongxiang Qiu; Abigail G Matthews; Jennifer McCormack; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  The hunt for efficient, incomplete designs for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and continuous outcome measures.

Authors:  Richard Hooper; Jessica Kasza; Andrew Forbes
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Enhanced Recovery after Intensive Care (ERIC): study protocol for a German stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a critical care telehealth program on process quality and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Christine Adrion; Bjoern Weiss; Nicolas Paul; Elke Berger; Reinhard Busse; Ursula Marschall; Jörg Caumanns; Simone Rosseau; Ulrich Mansmann; Claudia Spies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Optimal design of cluster randomised trials with continuous recruitment and prospective baseline period.

Authors:  Richard Hooper; Andrew J Copas
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.486

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.