Li Wang1, Yixuan Gong2, Abdel Saci3, Peter M Szabo3, Alberto Martini4, Andrea Necchi5, Arlene Siefker-Radtke6, Sumanta Pal7, Elizabeth R Plimack8, John P Sfakianos4, Nina Bhardwaj2, Amir Horowitz2, Adam M Farkas2, David Mulholland9, Bruce S Fischer3, William K Oh2, Padmanee Sharma6, Jun Zhu10, Matthew D Galsky11. 1. Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Sema4, a Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. 3. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA. 4. Department of Urology; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. 5. Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy. 6. Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. 7. City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA. 8. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. 10. Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Sema4, a Mount Sinai Venture, Stamford, CT, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: jun.zhu@mssm.edu. 11. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Tisch Cancer Institute, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: matthew.galsky@mssm.edu.
Abstract
Prior studies have demonstrated that fibroblast receptor 3 (FGFR3)-mutant urothelial cancers (UCs) are associated with decreased T-cell infiltration. As FGFR3 mutations are enriched in luminal-like UC and luminal-like UC has been shown to be relatively less responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition (checkpoint inhibition [CPI]), these data have led to the speculation that FGFR3 mutations may be causally related to poor T-cell infiltration and that UC patients harboring FGFR3 mutations may be suboptimal candidates for CPI. Using data derived from two clinical trials exploring CPI in metastatic UC, we demonstrate no statistically significant difference in response rates in patients with FGFR3-mutant versus wild-type UC. We present hypothesis-generating data, suggesting that similar response rates may be explained by a "balancing out" of previously identified independent positive and negative predictors of CPI sensitivity; that is, compared with FGFR3 wild-type UC, FGFR3-mutant UC is associated with a similar tumor mutational burden, lower T-cell infiltration, but also lower stromal/transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signals. Based on our findings, FGFR3 mutation status is not a biomarker of resistance to CPI. Indeed, the single-agent activity of both FGFR3 inhibitors and CPI in FGFR3-mutant UC, and potential non-cross resistance provide a strong pragmatic rationale for combination approaches. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we examined the impact of a mutated gene found in a subset of urothelial cancers on response to treatment with immunotherapy. We found that patients with tumors harboring mutations in the gene FGFR3 respond to immunotherapy similarly to patients without such mutations.
Prior studies have demonstrated that fibroblast receptor 3 (FGFR3)-mutant urothelial cancers (UCs) are associated with decreased T-cell infiltration. As FGFR3 mutations are enriched in luminal-like UC and luminal-like UC has been shown to be relatively less responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition (checkpoint inhibition [CPI]), these data have led to the speculation that FGFR3 mutations may be causally related to poor T-cell infiltration and that UC patients harboring FGFR3 mutations may be suboptimal candidates for CPI. Using data derived from two clinical trials exploring CPI in metastatic UC, we demonstrate no statistically significant difference in response rates in patients with FGFR3-mutant versus wild-type UC. We present hypothesis-generating data, suggesting that similar response rates may be explained by a "balancing out" of previously identified independent positive and negative predictors of CPI sensitivity; that is, compared with FGFR3 wild-type UC, FGFR3-mutant UC is associated with a similar tumor mutational burden, lower T-cell infiltration, but also lower stromal/transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signals. Based on our findings, FGFR3 mutation status is not a biomarker of resistance to CPI. Indeed, the single-agent activity of both FGFR3 inhibitors and CPI in FGFR3-mutant UC, and potential non-cross resistance provide a strong pragmatic rationale for combination approaches. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this report, we examined the impact of a mutated gene found in a subset of urothelial cancers on response to treatment with immunotherapy. We found that patients with tumors harboring mutations in the gene FGFR3 respond to immunotherapy similarly to patients without such mutations.
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Randy F Sweis; Stefani Spranger; Riyue Bao; Gladell P Paner; Walter M Stadler; Gary Steinberg; Thomas F Gajewski Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Jordi Barretina; Giordano Caponigro; Nicolas Stransky; Kavitha Venkatesan; Adam A Margolin; Sungjoon Kim; Christopher J Wilson; Joseph Lehár; Gregory V Kryukov; Dmitriy Sonkin; Anupama Reddy; Manway Liu; Lauren Murray; Michael F Berger; John E Monahan; Paula Morais; Jodi Meltzer; Adam Korejwa; Judit Jané-Valbuena; Felipa A Mapa; Joseph Thibault; Eva Bric-Furlong; Pichai Raman; Aaron Shipway; Ingo H Engels; Jill Cheng; Guoying K Yu; Jianjun Yu; Peter Aspesi; Melanie de Silva; Kalpana Jagtap; Michael D Jones; Li Wang; Charles Hatton; Emanuele Palescandolo; Supriya Gupta; Scott Mahan; Carrie Sougnez; Robert C Onofrio; Ted Liefeld; Laura MacConaill; Wendy Winckler; Michael Reich; Nanxin Li; Jill P Mesirov; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Kristin Ardlie; Vivien Chan; Vic E Myer; Barbara L Weber; Jeff Porter; Markus Warmuth; Peter Finan; Jennifer L Harris; Matthew Meyerson; Todd R Golub; Michael P Morrissey; William R Sellers; Robert Schlegel; Levi A Garraway Journal: Nature Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Li Wang; Abdel Saci; Peter M Szabo; Scott D Chasalow; Mireia Castillo-Martin; Josep Domingo-Domenech; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Padmanee Sharma; John P Sfakianos; Yixuan Gong; Ana Dominguez-Andres; William K Oh; David Mulholland; Alex Azrilevich; Liangyuan Hu; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Hélène Salmon; Nina Bhardwaj; Jun Zhu; Matthew D Galsky Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-08-29 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Sanjeev Mariathasan; Shannon J Turley; Dorothee Nickles; Alessandra Castiglioni; Kobe Yuen; Yulei Wang; Edward E Kadel; Hartmut Koeppen; Jillian L Astarita; Rafael Cubas; Suchit Jhunjhunwala; Romain Banchereau; Yagai Yang; Yinghui Guan; Cecile Chalouni; James Ziai; Yasin Şenbabaoğlu; Stephen Santoro; Daniel Sheinson; Jeffrey Hung; Jennifer M Giltnane; Andrew A Pierce; Kathryn Mesh; Steve Lianoglou; Johannes Riegler; Richard A D Carano; Pontus Eriksson; Mattias Höglund; Loan Somarriba; Daniel L Halligan; Michiel S van der Heijden; Yohann Loriot; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Lawrence Fong; Ira Mellman; Daniel S Chen; Marjorie Green; Christina Derleth; Gregg D Fine; Priti S Hegde; Richard Bourgon; Thomas Powles Journal: Nature Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Sumanta K Pal; Dean Bajorin; Nazli Dizman; Jean Hoffman-Censits; David I Quinn; Daniel P Petrylak; Matthew D Galsky; Ulka Vaishampayan; Ugo De Giorgi; Sumati Gupta; Howard A Burris; Harris S Soifer; Gary Li; Hao Wang; Carl L Dambkowski; Susan Moran; Siamak Daneshmand; Jonathan E Rosenberg Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: John P Lynes; Anthony K Nwankwo; Hannah P Sur; Victoria E Sanchez; Kwadwo A Sarpong; Oluwatobi I Ariyo; Gifty A Dominah; Edjah K Nduom Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Xiao X Wei; Lillian Werner; Min Y Teo; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Vadim S Koshkin; Petros Grivas; Bernadett Szabados; Laura Morrison; Thomas Powles; Lucia Carril-Ajuria; Daniel Castellano; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Noah M Hahn; Rana R McKay; Daniele Raggi; Andrea Necchi; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Parissa Alerasool; Jacob Gaines; Matthew Galsky; Joaquim Bellmunt; Guru Sonpavde Journal: J Urol Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Min Yuen Teo; Jose Mauricio Mota; Karissa A Whiting; Han A Li; Samuel A Funt; Chung-Han Lee; David B Solit; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Matthew I Milowsky; Arjun V Balar; Eugene Pietzak; Guido Dalbagni; Bernard H Bochner; Irina Ostrovnaya; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Gopa Iyer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 20.096