| Literature DB >> 31272450 |
Muhammad Sajid Arshad1, Syeda Mamoona Batool2, Muhammad Kamran Khan2, Muhammad Imran2, Muhammad Haseeb Ahmad2, Faqir Muhammad Anjum3, Shahzad Hussain4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present research project was designed to evaluate the cholesterol lowering potential of different date varieties including one exotic (Ajwa) and three Pakistani varieties (Aseel, Khudravi, Hallawi).Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant profile; Date varieties; Hypercholesterolemia; Rats modelling
Year: 2019 PMID: 31272450 PMCID: PMC6610949 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-019-1087-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Proximate composition of different date varieties
| Varieties | Ash | Moisture | Fat | Fiber | Protein | NFE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajwa | 1.68 ± 0.05c | 25.75 ± 0.04a | 0.26 ± 0.01b | 2.43 ± 0.04a | 2.77 ± 0.01a | 93.08 ± 0.02a |
| Aseel | 1.68 ± 0.04c | 25.75 ± 0.03a | 0.28 ± 0.05b | 2.64 ± 0.04a | 2.77 ± 0.04a | 92.62 ± 0.20b |
| Hallawi | 1.90 ± 0.03b | 22.99 ± 0.02c | 0.49 ± 0.04a | 2.02 ± 0.03b | 2.49 ± 0.13b | 93.08 ± 0.20a |
| Khudravi | 2.15 ± 0.19a | 24.85 ± 0.06b | 0.55 ± 0.03a | 2.47 ± 0.02a | 2.64 ± 0.02a | 92.18 ± 0.13c |
Different letters showed significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in column; values are expressed as means ± standard deviation of three independent determinations
Texture analysis and fruit weight of different date varieties
| Varieties | Texture (g) | Fruit Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|
| Ajwa | 38.39 ± 0.03a | 11.41 ± 0.01c |
| Hallawi | 31.58 ± 0.03c | 11.68 ± 0.01a |
| Aseel | 37.40 ± 0.02b | 6.89 ± 0.01d |
| Khudravi | 30.13 ± 0.01d | 11.58 ± 0.01b |
Different letters showed significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in columns; values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations
Mineral composition of different date varieties (mg/100 g)
| Varieties | Sodium | Calcium | Iron | Magnesium | Potassium | Zinc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ajwa | 9.50 ± 0.1d | 191.00 ± 1.07a | 3.13 ± 0.01d | 146.93 ± 0.01c | 482.00 ± 2.98c | 1.30 ± 0.01b |
| Aseel | 18.00 ± 1.06a | 160.03 ± 1.02b | 3.30 ± 0.01c | 56.00 ± 0.02ab | 465.00 ± 2.95d | 1.80 ± 2.01a |
| Hallawi | 12.00 ± 1.04b | 165.66 ± 0.99b | 5.40 ± 0.01a | 50.32 ± 0.02b | 849.33 ± 0.98b | 1.40 ± 0.01b |
| Khudravi | 11.00 ± 1.02c | 135.03 ± 0.95c | 4.40 ± 0.01a | 52.35 ± 0.01a | 887.20 ± 1.02a | 1.27 ± 0.01b |
Different letters showed significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in columns; values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations
Antioxidant profile of different varieties
| Varieties | TPC (mg/100 g) | % DPPH scavenging |
|---|---|---|
| Ajwa | 252.65 ± 0.05c | 75.13 ± 2.78c |
| Hillawi | 282.65 ± 0.04b | 66.14 ± 2.55d |
| Aseel | 291.36 ± 0.04a | 89.15 ± 1.65a |
| Khudravi | 232.64 ± 0.07d | 84.65 ± 1.65b |
Different letters show significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in columns; values are expressed as means ± standard deviation in three independent determinations
Total, reducing and non-reducing sugars of different date varieties
| Varieties | Total sugars % | Reducing sugar % | Non reducing % sugars |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ajwa | 86.24 ± 1.54a | 79.45 ± 1.22a | 6.74 ± 0.01b |
| Hallawi | 83.58 ± 2.41a | 77.68 ± 1.42a | 5.90 ± 0.01b |
| Aseel | 71.96 ± 1.42c | 68.18 ± 1.39c | 3.78 ± 0.02c |
| Khudravi | 80.46 ± 2.63b | 73.33 ± 1.32b | 7.13 ± 0.02a |
Different letters showed significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in columns; values are expressed as means ± standard deviation in three independent determinations
Total Cholesterol, Triglycerides, LDL, HDL, ALT, Creatinine and Urea in animal blood
| Parameters | Treatments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
| Cholesterol | 83.66 ± 0.57f | 148.33 ± 0.57a | 136.67 ± 1.54b | 110.67 ± 1.15d | 130.33 ± 0.57c | 103.67 ± 1.15 e |
| Triglyceride | 69.39 ± 0.44f | 110.67 ± 1.15a | 92.33 ± 0.57c | 76.83 ± 1.04d | 100.67 ± 0.57b | 72.33 ± 0.57e |
| LDL | 27.33 ± 0.57f | 92.86 ± 0.98a | 70.66 ± 1.15b | 55.33 ± 0.57e | 66.66 ± 1.15c | 60.00 ± 1.73d |
| HDL | 56.66 ± 0.57d | 39.86 ± 1.15a | 52.66 ± 1.15e | 62.33 ± 0.57c | 57.66 ± 1.15d | 84.66 ± 1.15b |
| ALT | 42.66 ± 0.57f | 58.66 ± 1.15a | 53.66 ± 1.15b | 48.66 ± 0.57d | 50.66 ± 1.15c | 45.33 ± 1.15e |
| Creatinine | 0.78 ± 0.01c | 1.72 ± 0.01a | 1.30 ± 0.17b | 0.83 ± 0.05c | 0.43 ± 0.11d | 0.76 ± 0.11c |
| Urea | 21.96 ± 0.35e | 37.66 ± 1.15a | 33.66 ± 1.15b | 27.66 ± 1.15d | 30.66 ± 0.57c | 27.33 ± 0.57d |
Different letters show significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in rows; values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation of three independent determinations
T0: Control
T1: High sucrose high cholesterol diet
T2: High sucrose high cholesterol diet + Intervention (Khudravi)
T3: High sucrose high cholesterol diet + Intervention (Hallawi)
T4: High sucrose high cholesterol diet + Intervention (Aseel)
T5: High sucrose high cholesterol diet + Intervention (Ajwa)
Sensory attributes of different date bars
| Treatment | Color | Flavor | Taste | Texture | Mouth feel | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T 1 | 6.40 ± 0.54c | 5.80 ± 0.83c | 4.40 ± 0.54d | 5.40 ± 0.54c | 4.40 ± 0.54b | 5.20 ± 0.44c |
| T 2 | 8.40 ± 0.54a | 8.40 ± 0.54a | 8.80 ± 0.44a | 8.40 ± 0.54a | 8.00 ± 0a | 8.60 ± 0.54a |
| T3 | 7.60 ± 0.54b | 7.40 ± 0.54b | 7.60 ± 0.54b | 7.00 ± 0.7b | 7.40 ± 0.54a | 7.40 ± 0.54b |
| T 4 | 5.60 ± 0.54d | 5.20 ± 0.44c | 5.20 ± 0.44c | 4.80 ± 0.44c | 5.00 ± 0.7b | 5.40 ± 0.54c |
Different letters show significant variations (p ≤ 0.05) in columns; values are expressed as means ± standard deviation in ten independent determinations
T1: (50% Date paste, 20% Chick pea flour)
T2: (40% Date paste, 30% Chick pea flour)
T3: (30% Date paste, 40% Chick pea flour)
T4: (20% Date paste, 50% Chick pea flour)