Literature DB >> 31271823

Deep Convolution Neural Network (DCNN) Multiplane Approach to Synthetic CT Generation From MR images-Application in Brain Proton Therapy.

Maria Francesca Spadea1, Giampaolo Pileggi2, Paolo Zaffino1, Patrick Salome3, Ciprian Catana4, David Izquierdo-Garcia4, Francesco Amato5, Joao Seco6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The first aim of this work is to present a novel deep convolution neural network (DCNN) multiplane approach and compare it to single-plane prediction of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) by using the real computed tomography (CT) as ground truth. The second aim is to demonstrate the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton therapy planning for the brain by assessing the range shift error within the clinical acceptance threshold. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The image database included 15 pairs of MRI/CT scans of the head. Three DCNNs were trained to estimate, for each voxel, the Hounsfield unit (HU) value from MRI intensities. Each DCNN gave an estimation in the axial, sagittal, and coronal plane, respectively. The median HU among the 3 values was selected to build the sCT. The sCT/CT agreement was evaluated by a mean absolute error (MAE) and mean error, computed within the head contour and on 6 different tissues. Dice similarity coefficients were calculated to assess the geometric overlap of bone and air cavities segmentations. A 3-beam proton therapy plan was simulated for each patient. Beam-by-beam range shift (RS) analysis was conducted to assess the proton-stopping power estimation. RS analysis was performed using clinically accepted thresholds of (1) 3.5% + 1 mm and (2) 2.5% + 1.5 mm of the total range.
RESULTS: DCNN multiplane statistically outperformed single-plane prediction of sCT (P < .025). MAE and mean error within the head were 54 ± 7 HU and -4 ± 17 HU (mean ± standard deviation), respectively. Soft tissues were very close to perfect agreement (11 ± 3 HU in terms of MAE). Segmentation of air and bone regions led to a Dice similarity coefficient of 0.92 ± 0.03 and 0.93 ± 0.02, respectively. Proton RS was always below clinical acceptance thresholds, with a relative RS error of 0.14% ± 1.11%.
CONCLUSIONS: The multiplane DCNN approach significantly improved the sCT prediction compared with other DCNN methods presented in the literature. The method was demonstrated to be highly accurate for MRI-only proton planning purposes.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31271823     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  9 in total

1.  Adaptive Proton Therapy of Pediatric Head and Neck Cases Using MRI-Based Synthetic CTs: Initial Experience of the Prospective KiAPT Study.

Authors:  Christian Bäumer; Rezarta Frakulli; Jessica Kohl; Sindhu Nagaraja; Theresa Steinmeier; Rasin Worawongsakul; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT generated with GANs for MRI-only proton therapy treatment planning of brain tumors.

Authors:  Samaneh Kazemifar; Ana M Barragán Montero; Kevin Souris; Sara T Rivas; Robert Timmerman; Yang K Park; Steve Jiang; Xavier Geets; Edmond Sterpin; Amir Owrangi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 3.  MR-guided proton therapy: a review and a preview.

Authors:  Aswin Hoffmann; Bradley Oborn; Maryam Moteabbed; Susu Yan; Thomas Bortfeld; Antje Knopf; Herman Fuchs; Dietmar Georg; Joao Seco; Maria Francesca Spadea; Oliver Jäkel; Christopher Kurz; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.481

4.  Distant metastasis time to event analysis with CNNs in independent head and neck cancer cohorts.

Authors:  Marco Riboldi; Guillaume Landry; Elia Lombardo; Christopher Kurz; Sebastian Marschner; Michele Avanzo; Vito Gagliardi; Giuseppe Fanetti; Giovanni Franchin; Joseph Stancanello; Stefanie Corradini; Maximilian Niyazi; Claus Belka; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Facilitating MR-Guided Adaptive Proton Therapy in Children Using Deep Learning-Based Synthetic CT.

Authors:  Chuang Wang; Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Chia-Ho Hua; Sahaja Acharya
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25

6.  Evaluating Proton Dose and Associated Range Uncertainty Using Daily Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Heng Li; William T Hrinivich; Hao Chen; Khadija Sheikh; Meng Wei Ho; Rachel Ger; Dezhi Liu; Russell Kenneth Hales; Khinh Ranh Voong; Aditya Halthore; Curtiland Deville
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Emergence of MR-Linac in Radiation Oncology: Successes and Challenges of Riding on the MRgRT Bandwagon.

Authors:  Indra J Das; Poonam Yadav; Bharat B Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Effect of the Agglomerate Geometry on the Effective Electrical Conductivity of a Porous Electrode.

Authors:  Abimael Rodriguez; Roger Pool; Jaime Ortegon; Beatriz Escobar; Romeli Barbosa
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14

9.  Clinical suitability of deep learning based synthetic CTs for adaptive proton therapy of lung cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Thummerer; Carmen Seller Oria; Paolo Zaffino; Arturs Meijers; Gabriel Guterres Marmitt; Robin Wijsman; Joao Seco; Johannes Albertus Langendijk; Antje-Christin Knopf; Maria Francesca Spadea; Stefan Both
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.506

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.