Literature DB >> 31271818

Reversal of ultrasonic vocalization deficits in a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome with minocycline treatment or genetic reduction of MMP-9.

Maximiliano A Toledo1, Teresa H Wen2, Devin K Binder3, Iryna M Ethell3, Khaleel A Razak4.   

Abstract

Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is a leading genetic cause of autism and intellectual disabilities. The Fmr1 knockout (KO) mouse is a commonly studied pre-clinical model of FXS. Adult male Fmr1 KO mice produce fewer ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) during mating, suggestive of abnormal social communication. Minocycline treatment for 2 months from birth alleviates a number of FXS phenotypes in mice, including USV call rate deficits. In the current study, we investigated if treatment initiated past the early developmental period would be effective, given that in many cases, individuals with FXS are treated during later developmental periods. Wildtype (WT) and Fmr1 KO mice were treated with minocycline between postnatal day (P) 30 and P58. Mating-related USVs were then recorded from these mice between P75 and P90 and analyzed for call rate, duration, bandwidth, and peak frequency. Untreated Fmr1 KO mice call at a significantly reduced rate compared to untreated WT mice. After minocycline treatment from 1 to 2 months of age, WT and Fmr1 KO mice exhibited similar call rates, due to an increase in calling in the latter group. Minocycline is thought to be effective in reducing FXS symptoms by lowering matrix-metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels. To determine whether abnormal MMP-9 levels underlie USV deficits, we characterized USVs in Fmr1 KO mice which were heterozygous for MMP-9 (MMP-9+/-/Fmr1 KO). The MMP-9+/-/Fmr1 KO mice were between P75 and P90 at the time of recording. MMP-9+/-/Fmr1 KO mice exhibited significantly increased USV call rates, at times even exceeding WT rates. Taken together, these results suggest that minocycline may reverse USV call rate deficits in Fmr1 KO mice through attenuation of MMP-9 levels. These data suggest targeting MMP-9, even in late development, may reduce FXS symptoms.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autism; Fragile X Syndrome; MMP-9; Minocycline; Social communication; Ultrasonic vocalization

Year:  2019        PMID: 31271818      PMCID: PMC6662633          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  50 in total

1.  Dose-response effect of tetracyclines on cerebral matrix metalloproteinase-9 after vascular endothelial growth factor hyperstimulation.

Authors:  Chanhung Z Lee; Jianhua S Yao; Yong Huang; Wenwu Zhai; Weizhong Liu; B Joseph Guglielmo; Emil Lin; Guo-Yuan Yang; William L Young
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 2.  Types and functions of ultrasonic vocalizations in laboratory rats and mice.

Authors:  Christine V Portfors
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Minocycline, a tetracycline derivative, is neuroprotective against excitotoxicity by inhibiting activation and proliferation of microglia.

Authors:  T Tikka; B L Fiebich; G Goldsteins; R Keinanen; J Koistinaho
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  Kimberly M Huber; Sean M Gallagher; Stephen T Warren; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Minocycline inhibits caspase-1 and caspase-3 expression and delays mortality in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington disease.

Authors:  M Chen; V O Ona; M Li; R J Ferrante; K B Fink; S Zhu; J Bian; L Guo; L A Farrell; S M Hersch; W Hobbs; J P Vonsattel; J H Cha; R M Friedlander
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  The promise of minocycline in neurology.

Authors:  V Wee Yong; Jennifer Wells; Fabrizio Giuliani; Steven Casha; Christopher Power; Luanne M Metz
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 7.  The neural control of vocalization in mammals: a review.

Authors:  U Jürgens
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Evidence for social anxiety and impaired social cognition in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Caitlyn H McNaughton; Jisook Moon; Myla S Strawderman; Kenneth N Maclean; Jeffrey Evans; Barbara J Strupp
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Ultrasonic vocalizations emitted during dyadic interactions in female mice: a possible index of sociability?

Authors:  Anna Moles; Fabrizio Costantini; Luciana Garbugino; Claudio Zanettini; Francesca R D'Amato
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Ultrasonic songs of male mice.

Authors:  Timothy E Holy; Zhongsheng Guo
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

1.  Influence of Gestational Chlorpyrifos Exposure on ASD-like Behaviors in an fmr1-KO Rat Model.

Authors:  Cristian Perez-Fernandez; María Matamala Montoya; Miguel Morales-Navas; Laia Guardia-Escote; María Cabré; María Teresa Colomina; Estela Giménez; Fernando Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.682

2.  Deletion of Fmr1 in parvalbumin-expressing neurons results in dysregulated translation and selective behavioral deficits associated with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Magdalena Kalinowska; Mathijs B van der Lei; Michael Kitiashvili; Maggie Mamcarz; Mauricio M Oliveira; Francesco Longo; Eric Klann
Journal:  Mol Autism       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 6.476

3.  Acute pharmacological inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity during development restores perineuronal net formation and normalizes auditory processing in Fmr1 KO mice.

Authors:  Patricia S Pirbhoy; Maham Rais; Jonathan W Lovelace; Walker Woodard; Khaleel A Razak; Devin K Binder; Iryna M Ethell
Journal:  J Neurochem       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 5.372

4.  Targeted therapy of cognitive deficits in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A Puścian; M Winiarski; J Borowska; S Łęski; T Górkiewicz; M Chaturvedi; K Nowicka; M Wołyniak; J J Chmielewska; T Nikolaev; K Meyza; M Dziembowska; L Kaczmarek; E Knapska
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 13.437

Review 5.  EEG as a translational biomarker and outcome measure in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Aisling Kenny; Damien Wright; Andrew C Stanfield
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 6.  Fragile X Syndrome: From Molecular Aspect to Clinical Treatment.

Authors:  Dragana D Protic; Ramkumar Aishworiya; Maria Jimena Salcedo-Arellano; Si Jie Tang; Jelena Milisavljevic; Filip Mitrovic; Randi J Hagerman; Dejan B Budimirovic
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  A neurophysiological model of speech production deficits in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Lauren M Schmitt; Jun Wang; Ernest V Pedapati; Angela John Thurman; Leonard Abbeduto; Craig A Erickson; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2019-12-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.