Wessel M C M Vorselaars1, Dirk-Jan van Beek1, Emily L Postma1, Wilko Spiering2, Inne H M Borel Rinkes1, Gerlof D Valk3, Menno R Vriens4. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room G04.228, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Vascular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room G04.228, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. mvriens@umcutrecht.nl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is far from a certainty. This stresses the importance of adequate preoperative patient counseling. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) is a simple and easy to use prediction model only including four variables: ≤ 2 antihypertensive medications, body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤ 6 years and female sex. However, because the model was developed and validated within the USA over a decade ago, the applicability in modern practice and outside of the USA is questionable. Therefore, we aimed to validate the ARS in current clinical practice within an international cohort. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy, between 2010 and 2016, in 16 medical centers from the USA, Europe (EU), Canada (CA) and Australia (AU) were included. Resolution of hypertension was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: In total, 514 patients underwent adrenalectomy and 435 (85%) patients were eligible. Resolution of hypertension was achieved in 27% patients within the total cohort and in 22%, 30%, 40% and 38% of patients within USA, EU, CA and AU, respectively (p = 0.015). The area under the curve (AUC) for the complete cohort was 0.751. Geographic validation displayed a AUC within the USA, EU, CA and AU of 0.782, 0.681, 0.811 and 0.667, respectively. DISCUSSION: The ARS is an easy to use prediction model with a moderate to good predictive performance within current clinical practice. The model showed the highest predictive performance within North America but potentially has less predictive performance in EU and AU.
INTRODUCTION: Complete resolution of hypertension after adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism is far from a certainty. This stresses the importance of adequate preoperative patient counseling. The aldosteronoma resolution score (ARS) is a simple and easy to use prediction model only including four variables: ≤ 2 antihypertensive medications, body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2, duration of hypertension ≤ 6 years and female sex. However, because the model was developed and validated within the USA over a decade ago, the applicability in modern practice and outside of the USA is questionable. Therefore, we aimed to validate the ARS in current clinical practice within an international cohort. MATERIALS AND METHOD:Patients who underwent unilateral adrenalectomy, between 2010 and 2016, in 16 medical centers from the USA, Europe (EU), Canada (CA) and Australia (AU) were included. Resolution of hypertension was defined as normotension without antihypertensive medications. RESULTS: In total, 514 patients underwent adrenalectomy and 435 (85%) patients were eligible. Resolution of hypertension was achieved in 27% patients within the total cohort and in 22%, 30%, 40% and 38% of patients within USA, EU, CA and AU, respectively (p = 0.015). The area under the curve (AUC) for the complete cohort was 0.751. Geographic validation displayed a AUC within the USA, EU, CA and AU of 0.782, 0.681, 0.811 and 0.667, respectively. DISCUSSION: The ARS is an easy to use prediction model with a moderate to good predictive performance within current clinical practice. The model showed the highest predictive performance within North America but potentially has less predictive performance in EU and AU.
Authors: Karel G M Moons; Andre Pascal Kengne; Diederick E Grobbee; Patrick Royston; Yvonne Vergouwe; Douglas G Altman; Mark Woodward Journal: Heart Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Geert J M G van der Heijden; A Rogier T Donders; Theo Stijnen; Karel G M Moons Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Paul Milliez; Xavier Girerd; Pierre-François Plouin; Jacques Blacher; Michel E Safar; Jean-Jacques Mourad Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-04-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sabine C Käyser; Tanja Dekkers; Hans J Groenewoud; Gert Jan van der Wilt; J Carel Bakx; Mark C van der Wel; Ad R Hermus; Jacques W Lenders; Jaap Deinum Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Wessel M C M Vorselaars; Dirk-Jan van Beek; Diederik P D Suurd; Emily Postma; Wilko Spiering; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Gerlof D Valk; Menno R Vriens Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Diederik P D Suurd; Wouter P Visscher; Wessel M C M Vorselaars; Dirk-Jan van Beek; Wilko Spiering; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Gerlof D Valk; Menno R Vriens Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2021-04-20
Authors: Gustavo Romero-Velez; Amanda M Laird; Manuel E Barajas; Mauricio Sierra-Salazar; Miguel F Herrera; Steven K Libutti; Michael K Parides; Xavier Pereira; John C McAuliffe Journal: World J Surg Date: 2021-02-07 Impact factor: 3.352