Literature DB >> 31270420

An efficient micropropagation protocol for an endangered ornamental tree species (Magnolia sirindhorniae Noot. & Chalermglin) and assessment of genetic uniformity through DNA markers.

Yuanyuan Cui1,2,3, Yanwen Deng1,2, Keyuan Zheng1,2, Xiaomin Hu1,2, Mulan Zhu4, Xiaomei Deng5,6, Ruchun Xi7,8.   

Abstract

Magnolia sirindhorniae Noot. & Chalermglin is an endangered species with high ornamental and commercial value that needs to be urgently protected and judiciously commercialized. In this study, a protocol for efficient regeneration of this species is standardized. The lateral buds of the M. sirindhorniae plant were used as an explant. Half-strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.0 mg/L 6-benzyladenine (BA), 0.1 mg/L α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 2.0 mg/L gibberellic acid (GA3) was found to be the optimal medium for shoot induction. The maximum shoot multiplication rate (310%) was obtained on Douglas-fir cotyledon revised medium (DCR) fortified with 0.2 mg/L BA, 0.01 mg/L NAA, and additives. The half-strength DCR medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 0.5 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) supported the maximum rate (85.0%) of in vitro root induction. After a simple acclimatization process, the survival rate of plantlets in a substrate mixture of sterile perlite and peat soil (1:3; v/v) was 90.2%. DNA markers were used for assessment of genetic uniformity, confirming the genetic uniformity and stability of regenerated plants of M. sirindhorniae. Thus, the described protocol can safely be applied for large scale propagation of this imperative plant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31270420      PMCID: PMC6610120          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46050-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Magnolias (Magnoliaceae) have long been popular and widely cultivated as ornamental plants, shrubs, and trees. The majority of magnolias are an evergreen species of tree with a graceful form and abundant blooms, typically grown in gardens. Furthermore, many magnolia species have been used in traditional medicine for centuries and many of them have great economic importance as natural sources of aroma and bioactive compounds[1-3]. Magnolia sirindhorniae Noot. & Chalermglin, discovered in a freshwater bog in Thailand in 2002, is a new species used in landscaping due to its fast growth, dense foliage, beautiful canopy, and fragrant flowers[4]. Moreover, M. sirindhorniae has a unique waterlogging resistance, which makes it perfect and promising for the regreening of the wetland parks. Like other magnolia plants, essential oils can be derived from the leaves and flowers of M. sirindhorniae[5,6]. However, due to the decline of its habitat, it was classified as ‘Endangered’ on the IUCN Red List[7]. In addition, it is difficult for M. sirindhorniae to reproduce by seeds due to the low percentage of fruit setting. Plant tissue culture has made a significant contribution to the mass clonal propagation of ornamental and forest trees, providing a large number of superior clonal seedlings in a short time throughout the year[8]. Direct multiple shoot induction is the useful means of producing plantlets from young or mature trees with a lower risk of genetic instability than by the other regeneration routes, and it is a more reliable method for clonal propagation[9,10]. Many endangered magnolia species with high ornamental or commercial value, such as M. dealbata and M. punduana, have been protected and expanded by in vitro propagation[11-13]. However, only one root initiation study of M. sirindhorniae has been conducted in which root initiation (90%) was obtained on USK II medium (described by Chaidaroon, 2004) with 4.0 mg/L indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) after 24 days[14]. To date, no studies have reported a protocol for efficient regeneration of this important rare species. Therefore, we explored an efficient protocol for in vitro plant regeneration via shoot induction of M. sirindhorniae for the mass propagation of this precious magnolia plant. Under the long-term in vitro process, various factors such as media composition and plant growth regulators may result in variations in regenerated plants[15]. Therefore, the genetic uniformity assessment of regenerated plants is of great importance. In recent years, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) have successfully used for assessing the genetic fidelity of regenerated plantlets in many plant species[16-18]. In the present study, the semi-lignified nodal segments of a 10-year-old M. sirindhorniae plant were used as the explants, followed by optimization of protocol for axillary bud induction, cluster bud proliferation, rooting, and acclimatization. The genetic uniformity of regenerated plants was assessed by RAPD and ISSR markers. This research will be of great help to preserve this important species.

Methods

Plant material and preparation of explants

The semi-lignified nodal segments were collected from Shen Zhou Magnolia Park (113°18′E, 23°06′N) in the South China Agricultural University (Fig. 1a). After cleaning in a solution of 5% (v/v) liquid detergent, they were washed under running tap water for 1 hour. Further, they were cut into segments (2–5 cm) with one or two buds, then surface-sterilized with 75% (v/v) ethanol for 30 s, followed with 0.1% (w/v) mercuric chloride solution for 8–20 min. Afterwards, they were rinsed with sterile distilled water five times. After cutting off two ends, the sterilized explants were inoculated vertically on half-strength MS medium supplemented with different concentrations and combinations of plant growth regulators for shoot induction.
Figure 1

In vitro propagation of M. sirindhorniae using mature axillary node explants. (a) Mature tree; (b) Shoot bud initiation. (c) Multiple shoot bud regeneration. (d,e) Regenerated plantlets with well- developed roots. (f,h) Acclimatized plants.

In vitro propagation of M. sirindhorniae using mature axillary node explants. (a) Mature tree; (b) Shoot bud initiation. (c) Multiple shoot bud regeneration. (d,e) Regenerated plantlets with well- developed roots. (f,h) Acclimatized plants.

Culture media and growth conditions

Murashige and Skoog (MS)[19] medium, woody-plant medium (WPM)[20], Gamborg’s B-5 Basal Medium (B5)[21] and Douglas-fir cotyledon revised medium (DCR)[22] were used in this study. All the media were adjusted to pH 5.8, solidified with 7 g/L agar, and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15–18 min. The medium used for the shoot bud induction and multiplication contained 30 g/L sucrose and that used for the rooting contained 15 g/L sucrose. The cultures were incubated in the laboratory at 24 ± 2 °С under a 16/8-h (light/dark cycle) photoperiod provided with cool white fluorescent light (1500–3000 Lx)[23,24].

Shoot bud initiation

Half-strength MS medium was chosen as the basal culture medium for shoot induction[25,26]. The effect of different concentrations of diverse plant growth regulators added to half-strength MS medium was compared. Orthogonal design was adopted and repeated three times; each treatment consisted of 10 explants. The concentrations were as follows: 6-benzyladenine (BA): 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/L; α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA): 0, 0.05, 0.1 mg/L; gibberellic acid (GA3):0, 1.0, 2.0 mg/L. Three levels of each of the three factors were examined in nine experimental runs (orthogonal array L9(34))[27,28]. After four weeks of incubation, the percentage of shoot induction, time taken for bud initiation (marked by separation layer on the edges of the petiole), and the growth state of the buds were recorded.

Shoot proliferation

Nodal segments (1–2 cm) were cut off and transferred into fresh half-strength MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of BA (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 mg/L) in combination with NAA (0.01, 0.02, 0.04, and 0.06 mg/L) individually in order to standardize the maximum rate of shoot multiplication; there were 16 treatments in total. In addition, six different basal culture media (MS, 1/2 MS, 3/4 MS, WPM, B5, and DCR) with the same plant growth regulators were compared during the phase of subculture, and the optimal medium was selected. After four weeks of incubation, the multiplication rate and number of new shoots per explant (≧0.5 cm) were recorded.

Rooting

Individual shoots (≧1.2 cm height) were cut off and transferred into rooting media. Observations were recorded after every two days[29,30]. To optimize the best root induction medium, half-strength DCR medium was chosen as the rooting medium and was supplemented with different compositions and concentrations of the plant growth regulator: NAA (0.1–1.0 mg/L), IBA (0.1–1.0 mg/L), and cycocel CCC (0.1 and 0.5 mg/L. The percentage of root induction, root numbers, and the growth state of roots were observed and recorded after four weeks.

Acclimatization

Plantlets that were observed to have well-developed roots after four weeks were transferred to a greenhouse and kept for approximately 5–7 days. Afterwards, the plantlets were gently removed from the culture vessels and washed off the adhering medium. Subsequently, they were transplanted to plastic cups containing mixture of perlite and peat soil in a ratio of 1:3 (v/v), which had been disinfected with potassium permanganate solution (1000–1250 ppm). The survival rate was calculated after one month.

Assessment of genetic uniformity

For genetic fidelity studies, total genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaves of 18 randomly selected acclimatized plants and their mother plant using the Cetyltrimethyl Ammonium Bromide (CTAB) method[31]. In addition, the total genomic DNA of another M. sirindhorniae plant developed from seed was also extracted as the negative control. The concentration of DNA was measured using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For RAPD analysis, a total of 18 primers (TsingKe Biological Technology, Tianjin, China) were used according to previous reports[32,33] and initial experiments. The ISSR analysis was performed with three ISSR primers (TsingKe Biological Technology, Tianjin, China), which had been selected for genetic analysis of Magnolia in previous reports[34,35]. DNA amplification for RAPD and ISSR markers was performed in a volume of 25 μL reaction mixture containing 2.0 μL of template DNA (50–60 ng), 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq Plus MasterMix (Beijing ComWin Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 1.0 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primer, and 8.5 μL ddH2O. RAPD amplification was performed in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) programmed for initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, annealing at 37 for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 90 s with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. ISSR amplification was performed in a thermal cycler (Bio-Rad) programmed for initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 54 for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s with a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. All the PCRs were repeated three times, using the same conditions to check the accuracy of the amplified products. Amplified products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.25 μg/mL ethidium bromide (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) using 1x TAE (Tris Acetate EDTA) buffer. The size of the amplification products was estimated by 100 DNA ladder or 5000 bp DNA marker (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). The gels were photographed using the gel documentation system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), only clear and scorable DNA bands were considered.

Statistical analysis

Induction rate (%) = the number of induced explants/the number of total initial explants × 100%; Multiplication rate (%) = the total number of buds (≧0.3 cm)/the number of initial buds on the subcultured explants × 100%; Rooting rate (%) = the number of the rooted plantlets/the number of total shoots × 100%; Average root numbers = the total number of roots/the number of rooted seedlings. Each treatment consisted of 10 glass vessels with 4 plantlets, repeated in triplicate. SPSS software version 19.0 was used for the statistical analyses. The significance of differences among means was carried out using Duncan’s multiple range test at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01; The results were represented as mean ± standard error of three replicates.

Results and Discussion

Shoot bud induction

The sterilized explants were inoculated into the shoot induction media and then initiated growth after 5–14 days, while petioles began to fall off and small green buds appeared (Table 1a). The axillary bud induction phase was observed between 10–20 days. The higher the concentration of BA added, the earlier the buds sprouted. The range analysis shows that BA had the most influence on the induction rate (Table 1b). The induction rate was only 68% in the case of low BA concentration and the lateral buds initiated late; additionally, the new buds were thin and delicate. The advantageous BA concentration is 2.0 mg/L, and the induction rate reached 79%. Previous studies also showed that BA induced the maximum response. The superiority of BA over other cytokinins was reported by Hashem, Bekircan and Hussain[36-38]. GA3 contributes to the initiation and elongation of axillary buds as well as leaf expansion; the axillary buds began to grow after five days when GA3 was added. Comprehensively considering growth and induction rate, half-strength MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mg/L BA, 0.1 mg/L NAA, and 1.0 mg/L GA3 turned out to be a better medium for in vitro induction, as it supported maximum shoot bud induction (Fig. 1b).
Table 1

Effect of bud induction by different compositions and concentrations of plant growth regulators and range analysis.

Test numberBA mg/LNAAmg/LGA3 mg/LInduction rate % (mean ± SE)Time of initiationGrowth state of buds
a
10.50037.06 ± 0.86Dd14th day+
20.50.051.061.37 ± 1.78BCbc10th day++
30.50.12.059.10 ± 1.22Cc10th day++
41.001.068.03 ± 0.69ABCabc8th day+++
51.00.052.067.43 ± 2.01ABCabc8th day+++
61.00.1076.13 ± 1.56ABa10th day+++
72.002.075.23 ± 0.69ABa5th day++++
82.00.05072.00 ± 1.36ABabc7th day++++
92.00.11.079.03 ± 2.75Aa7th day++++
b
Range Analysis
KBA0.552.533KNAA060.100KGA061.733
KBA1.070.500KNAA0.0566.933KGA1.069.467
KBA2.075.400KNAA0.171.400KGA2.067.233
RBA22.867RNAA11.300RGA7.734

++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds.

Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test).

Kxy means sum of induction rate at the y level of x; R (Range) represents measures of variation, Rx=Kxmax-Kxmin.

Effect of bud induction by different compositions and concentrations of plant growth regulators and range analysis. ++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test). Kxy means sum of induction rate at the y level of x; R (Range) represents measures of variation, Rx=Kxmax-Kxmin. GA3 has been shown to modulate the growth and development of plants, mainly by stimulating mitotic division and cell elongation[39,40]. The positive effects of GA3 on bud break have been reported in the tissue culture of woody plant species[41-44]. However, adding the improper concentration of GA3 has a negative effect. It was found that a high level of GA3 effectively increased shoot length, whereas a lower concentration of GA3 inhibited shoot growth in in vitro culture of potato[45]. GA3 has been used to break dormancy and stimulate shoot elongation in different species of magnolias for a long time[46-48]. In the present study, GA3 was found to be important for bud induction, effectively shortening the time of initiation and inducing stronger buds, which is consistent with previous reports[49,50]. However, some plants cultured in vitro did not undergo any significant growth stimulation with GA3 [51]. Furthermore, GA3 at any concentration induced the formation of malformed plants in in vitro culture of Annona emarginata[52]. Therefore, GA3 should be used conservatively in tissue culture. Different species have different responses to GA3, and even different genotypes of the same species have different responses to GA3.

Shoot bud proliferation

The basal medium is an important substrate for plant tissue culture. Due to the genetic, biological and ecological characteristics of various plants, the nutritional components required by various plants are not the same, and the requirements for the composition of the medium are also different. Therefore, choosing the right type of medium is crucial for the success of plant tissue culture[53,54]. Shoot buds from explants were subcultured on six media supplemented with 0.2 mg/L BA in combination with 0.01 mg/L NAA to screen the optimal medium. Among the six tested media (Table 2), the best shoot bud proliferation and elongation were observed on DCR medium, which proliferated to 2.92 times than the original after four weeks (Fig. 1c). Although there was no significant difference observed in the multiplication rate and shoot numbers between MS, 1/2MS, WPM, and DCR media, the growth state of the buds was totally different. The bud clusters on the DCR medium were verdant green and thriving, showing no defoliation, vitrification, or callus.
Table 2

Effect of different basal media on bud proliferation.

Basal mediaMultiplication rate % (mean ± SE)Shoot numbers per explant (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE)Growth state of budsDescription
MS294.33 ± 6.12a1.48 ± 0.30abc++Hyperhydricity, callus
1/2MS275.00 ± 105.52ab1.83 ± 0.58a++Crinkle leaf, callus
3/4MS238.00 ± 24.22bc1.39 ± 0.47bc+Hyperhydricity, callus
DCR292.33 ± 13.78a1.85 ± 0.21a++++
WPM275.00 ± 23.28ab1.63 ± 0.93ab+++
B5204.67 ± 8.65c1.11 ± 0.23c+Flavescent, defoliation

++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds.

Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05. (Duncan’s multiple range test).

Effect of different basal media on bud proliferation. ++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05. (Duncan’s multiple range test). Further, shoot buds were subcultured on DCR medium supplemented with different combinations of BA and NAA to screen for the optimal combination and concentration of BA and NAA (Table 3). Apparently, there was an increase in the multiplication rate with the increase of BA concentration under the same auxin level. On the contrary, it decreased both in the multiplication rate and shoot numbers with increasing NAA concentration under the same cytokinin level. Higher number of multiple shoots occurred on the media with high BA concentrations. Defoliation and vitrification occurred when NAA concentration reached 0.06 mg/L. It is known that plantlets do not grow well when the level of growth regulator is high. Cytokinin promoted the optimal proliferation at low concentrations Among the various combinations tested, the highest rate (299%) of multiplication was observed on the medium fortified with the combination of 0.6 mg/L BA and 0.01 mg/L NAA. However, the optimal growth state of the buds as well as the shoot length (≧0.5 cm) was found on the medium fortified with the combination of 0.2 mg/L BA and 0.01 or 0.02 mg/L NAA (Table 3). In conclusion, the latter two combinations were more suitable for shoot bud proliferation and elongation (Fig. 1c).
Table 3

Effect of different compositions and concentrations of BA and NAA on bud proliferation.

BA mg/LNAA mg/LMultiplication rate % (mean ± SE)Shoot numbers per container (≧0.5 cm) (mean ± SE)Growth state of budsDescription
0.10.01274.00 ± 11.00ABCbcde5.25 ± 0.50BCDbc+Small buds
0.10.02270.33 ± 15.95ABCDcde4.51 ± 0.25Dc+
0.10.04244.00 ± 9.85DEfg4.48 ± 0.75Dc+Defoliation
0.10.06228.67 ± 21.57Eg4.75 ± 0.75CDc++Defoliation
0.20.01281.00 ± 6.25ABCabcd7.00 ± 0.25Aa++++
0.20.02296.67 ± 5.13ABab7.00 ± 0.50Aa++++
0.20.04266.33 ± 7.51BCDde6.08 ± 0.38ABCab+++
0.20.06235.33 ± 15.04Eg4.83 ± 0.52CDc+++Defoliation
0.40.01290.33 ± 6.03ABabc6.63 ± 0.25ABa++Crinkle leaf
0.40.02275.33 ± 10.60ABCbcde5.33 ± 0.54BCDbc++Crinkle leaf
0.40.04236.00 ± 20.95Eg5.18 ± 0.86CDc++
0.40.06228.67 ± 6.81Eg4.83 ± 0.90CDc++Hyperhydricity
0.60.01299.00 ± 13.12Aa6.75 ± 0.50ABa+++Dense buds
0.60.02293.00 ± 6.25ABabc6.50 ± 0.50ABCbcde++Dense buds
0.60.04280.33 ± 11.93ABCabcd5.25 ± 0.50BCDbc+Flavescent
0.60.06257.67 ± 7.23CDEef4.67 ± 0.89CDc+Hyperhydricity

++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds.

Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test).

Effect of different compositions and concentrations of BA and NAA on bud proliferation. ++++: vigorous and green buds; +++: healthy buds; ++: weak buds; +: unhealthy buds. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test). Hyperhydricity is a physiological malformation that results in excessive hydration, yellowing, swelling, glassiness, and leaf curling, which directly affects propagation[55]. In the present study, M. sirindhorniae plantlets that were grown showed signs of being hyperhydrated when cultured on MS medium and 3/4 MS medium that contained high concentrations of nitrate, especially with higher BA (Tables 2 and 3). Hyperhydricity disappeared when the medium was changed and the concentration of plant growth regulators was reduced. It was reported that hyperhydricity was positively correlated with tissue nitrate content and cytokinin concentration[56,57], which may explain why plantlets are hyperhydrated on MS medium or 3/4 MS medium. However, it is unlikely that the tissue nitrate level alone directly affects hyperhydricity. It was also reported that ventilation of culture vessels and using the proper gelling agent can relieve hyperhydricity; the use of gelrite resulted in almost four times higher hyperhydricity compared to agar-solidified medium[58-60]. Using a ventilated culture vessel was proven to be useful to relieve hyperhydricity for in vitro plantlets of M. sirindhorniae. The inability to induce adventitious roots is often a limiting factor in conventional cuttings and tissue culture. In an earlier review, the plants in Magnoliaceae had difficulty with root formation[61,62]. It was reported that in vitro Magnoliaceae shoots had difficulty with rhizogenesis under the low concentration of plant growth regulators and only produced a large amount of calluses[63]. Therefore, CCC was specifically added to the rooting media for the purpose of reducing the generation of calluses[29]. However, the supplementation of the medium with CCC did not result in successful rooting. The maximum percentage of rooting (95.67%) with plentiful lateral roots and slight callus as well as the highest average root number of 1.87 was observed on half-strength DCR medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 0.5 mg/L IBA (Table 4, Fig. 1d,e). This rooting medium is more efficient compared with that used in previous research[14]. The percentage of rooting first increased and then declined with the increasing concentration of auxins, which was consistent with the in vitro rooting studies of other woody plants[12,13,64]. Besides, the quality of the subculture shoots evidently influenced rooting. As a consequence, it is important to obtain healthy normal shoots in the phase of multiplication culture.
Table 4

Effects of auxins on the rooting of M. sirindhorniae.

Plant growth regulators combination mg/LPercentage of rooting %Root numbers (mean ± SE)Description
NAA 0.5 + IBA 154.33 ± 13.90Bc1.20 ± 0.20ABbcCallus
NAA 1 + IBA 1 + CCC 0.185.33 ± 6.10ABab1.45 ± 0.24ABabcCallus, no lateral roots
NAA 0.5 + IBA 1 + CCC 0.585.00 ± 6.10ABab1.57 ± 0.19ABabCallus
NAA 1 + CCC 0.175.33 ± 11.20ABabc1.67 ± 0.21ABabPlenty of callus
NAA 1 + CCC 0.570.67 ± 8.90ABabc1.40 ± 0.16ABabcPlenty of callus
NAA 160.00 ± 12.70ABbc1.70 ± 0.13ABabPlenty of callus
NAA 0.5 + IBA 0.595.67 ± 5.00Aa1.87 ± 0.18AaSlight callus, plentiful lateral roots
IBA 155.50 ± 7.30Bc1.67 ± 0.21ABabCallus, no lateral roots
NAA 0.1 + IBA 0.11.60 ± 10.20Cd1.00 ± 0.45BcPlenty of callus
01.60 ± 8.40Cd1.00 ± 0.38Bc

Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test).

Effects of auxins on the rooting of M. sirindhorniae. Each value represents the mean ± SE of three replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.05; Different uppercase letters in the same column indicated the significant difference at P ≤ 0.01. (Duncan’s multiple range test). The acclimatization of tissue cultured plants was the most difficult and labor-consuming step because the newly transplanted plantlets were highly susceptible to fungal diseases[65]. In the present study, the rooted plantlets were successfully transferred into plastic cups containing a perlite and peat soil mixture at a ratio of 1:3 followed by a series of effective protection measures. After being transplanted, the plantlets must be watered and then covered with plastic film and shading net to maintain high humidity. Additionally, it is necessary to spray the plantlets with a carbendazim solution to increase plant tolerance to environmental stresses. Ventilation and removal of fallen leaves and rotten seedling should be performed in a timely manner to prevent plant diseases and insect pests. The plastic film and shading net was removed after two weeks. The survival rate of plantlets reached 90.2% (Fig. 1f,g). After lignification, they were transferred to the field. Regenerated plants grew well in the field and were phenotypically similar to the mother stock (Fig. 1h).

Assessment of genetic uniformity of regenerated plants

Compared with the natural environment, in vitro culture is more complicated and stressful, which is more likely to cause genetic variation[66]. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the genetic uniformity of the regenerated plants before confirming the success of a micropropagation protocol. In the present study, a total of 174 bands were generated by RAPD and ISSR markers with an average of 8.3 bands per primer (Table 5). Eighteen RAPD primers generated 152 clear and scorable bands in total, ranging from 250 to 4000 bp. The number of bands generated by a single RAPD primer varied from 5 to 13 (Table 5, Fig. 2). Three ISSR primers generated 22 clear and scorable bands in total, ranging from 250 to 5000 bp. The number of bands generated by a single ISSR primer varied from 6 to 9. Compared with the negative control, no polymorphic bands were detected between mother plant and regenerated plants, confirming the genetic uniformity and stability of regenerated plants of M. sirindhorniae (Table 5, Fig. 3). Our results demonstrate that axillary shoot proliferation minimizes the chance of instability, consistent with previous reports[17,67,68]. This is the first report of genetically sustainable micropropagation in Magnolia plants.
Table 5

List of primers, their sequences, number, and size of the amplified fragments generated by 18 RAPD and 3 ISSR markers.

Primer codePrimer sequence (5′–3′)No. of scorable bandsApproximate Range of amplification (bp)
RAPD
S10CTGCTGGGAC12250–3,000
S11GTAGACCCGT5500–3,000
S17AGGGAACGAG6250–3,000
S18CCACAGCAGT6500–3,000
S22TGCCGAGCTG10250–2,000
S30GTGATCGCAG9200–2,000
S31CAATCGCCGT6250–3,000
S38AGGTGACCGT11400–2,000
S40GTTGCGATCC7400–1,500
S69CTCACCGTCC10300–1,500
S144GTGACATGCC8500–1,500
S154TGCGGCTGAG8500–1,500
S155ACGCACAACC9600–3,000
S158GGACTGCAGA8400–2,000
S160AACGGTGACC13200–3,000
S163CAGAAGCCCA8300–2,000
S173CTGGGGCTGA9500–2,000
S174TGACGGCGGT7500–4,000
Total 152
ISSR
UBC840(GA)8CTT9300–1,500
UBC842(GA)8CTG7250–5,000
UBC855(AC)8YT6250–3,000
Total 21
Figure 2

RAPD profiles generated by PCR amplification with primer S10 (a), S30 (b). Lane M: Molecular marker (100 bp–5 Kb for S10; 100 bp–1.5 Kb for S30); Lane A: Mother plant; Lane 1–18: Regenerated plants; Lane B: Another M. sirindhorniae plant developed from seed (negative control).

Figure 3

ISSR profiles generated by PCR amplification with primer UBC842 (a), UBC855 (b). Lane M: Molecular marker (100 bp–5 Kb); Lane A: Mother plant; Lane 1–18: Regenerated plants; Lane B: Another M. sirindhorniae plant developed from seed (negative control).

List of primers, their sequences, number, and size of the amplified fragments generated by 18 RAPD and 3 ISSR markers. RAPD profiles generated by PCR amplification with primer S10 (a), S30 (b). Lane M: Molecular marker (100 bp–5 Kb for S10; 100 bp–1.5 Kb for S30); Lane A: Mother plant; Lane 1–18: Regenerated plants; Lane B: Another M. sirindhorniae plant developed from seed (negative control). ISSR profiles generated by PCR amplification with primer UBC842 (a), UBC855 (b). Lane M: Molecular marker (100 bp–5 Kb); Lane A: Mother plant; Lane 1–18: Regenerated plants; Lane B: Another M. sirindhorniae plant developed from seed (negative control).

Conclusions

The present report describes an efficient protocol for large-scale micropropagation from axillary nodal explants of M. sirindhorniae. Direct multiple shoot induction suppresses the risk of genetic instability. The maximum shoot bud induction (79.0%) occurred on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2.0 mg/L BA, 0.1 mg/L NAA, and 2.0 mg/L GA3. It turned out that DCR medium was the best basic medium for in vitro propagation of M. sirindhorniae, and the highest proliferation rate (310%) was obtained on DCR medium fortified with 0.2 mg/L BA and 0.01 mg/L NAA. Half-strength DCR medium supplemented with 0.5 mg/L NAA and 0.5 mg/L IBA was proven to be the best for rooting, and the highest rooting percent (nearly 96%) was achieved in spite of the fact that it is difficult for Magnoliaceae plants to root in plant tissue culture. The regenerated plantlets were well-acclimatized to the wild. RAPD and ISSR markers confirmed the genetic uniformity of regenerated plants. Hence, this protocol can be successfully used for the commercial multiplication of M. sirindhorniae.
  11 in total

1.  Honokiol and magnolol production by in vitro micropropagated plants of Magnolia dealbata, an endangered endemic Mexican species.

Authors:  Fabiola Domínguez; Marco Chávez; María Luisa Garduño-Ramírez; Víctor M Chávez-Avila; Martín Mata; Francisco Cruz-Sosa
Journal:  Nat Prod Commun       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 0.986

Review 2.  Therapeutic applications of compounds in the Magnolia family.

Authors:  Young-Jung Lee; Yoot Mo Lee; Chong-Kil Lee; Jae Kyung Jung; Sang Bae Han; Jin Tae Hong
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Micropropagation of Vitex negundo L., a woody aromatic medicinal shrub, through high-frequency axillary shoot proliferation.

Authors:  Y Sahoo; P K Chand
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells.

Authors:  O L Gamborg; R A Miller; K Ojima
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.905

5.  Hyperhydricity in shoot cultures of Scrophularia yoshimurae can be effectively reduced by ventilation of culture vessels.

Authors:  Chien-Chou Lai; Hong-Ming Lin; Satish Manohar Nalawade; Wei Fang; Hsin-Sheng Tsay
Journal:  J Plant Physiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.549

6.  Shoot multiplication from mature trees of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugar pine (Pinus lambertiana).

Authors:  P K Gupta; D J Durzan
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.570

7.  Effect of cytokinins on in vitro multiplication, volatiles composition and rosmarinic acid content of Thymus leucotrichus Hal. shoots.

Authors:  Tuba Bekircan; Ahmet Yaşar; Sercan Yıldırım; Münevver Sökmen; Atalay Sökmen
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.406

8.  Regeneration of douglas fir plantlets through tissue culture.

Authors:  T Y Cheng; T H Voqui
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-10-21       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  An improved micropropagation of Arnebia hispidissima (Lehm.) DC. and assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants using DNA-based molecular markers.

Authors:  Mahendra Phulwaria; Manoj K Rai; N S Shekhawat
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 2.926

10.  Distinct gibberellin functions during and after grapevine bud dormancy release.

Authors:  Chuanlin Zheng; Atiako Kwame Acheampong; Zhaowan Shi; Tamar Halaly; Yuji Kamiya; Ron Ophir; David W Galbraith; Etti Or
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  6 in total

1.  Establishment of an efficient in vitro propagation protocol for Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and confirmation of the genetic homogeneity.

Authors:  Saleh Amiri; Reza Mohammadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A Micropropagation Protocol for the Endangered Medicinal Tree Prunus africana (Hook f.) Kalkman: Genetic Fidelity and Physiological Parameter Assessment.

Authors:  Richard Komakech; Yong-Goo Kim; Wook Jin Kim; Francis Omujal; Sungyu Yang; Byeong Cheol Moon; Denis Okello; Endang Rahmat; Grace Nambatya Kyeyune; Motlalepula Gilbert Matsabisa; Youngmin Kang
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 3.  In Vitro Technology in Plant Conservation: Relevance to Biocultural Diversity.

Authors:  Verena Kulak; Sheri Longboat; Nicolas D Brunet; Mukund Shukla; Praveen Saxena
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12

4.  Micropropagation, encapsulation, physiological, and genetic homogeneity assessment in Casuarina equisetifolia.

Authors:  Zishan Ahmad; Vikas Yadav; Anwar Shahzad; Abolghassem Emamverdian; Muthusamy Ramakrishnan; Yulong Ding
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Mathematical modeling and optimizing the in vitro shoot proliferation of wallflower using multilayer perceptron non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (MLP-NSGAII).

Authors:  Fazilat Fakhrzad; Abolfazl Jowkar; Javad Hosseinzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Efficient micropropagation of Thunbergia coccinea Wall. and genetic homogeneity assessment through RAPD and ISSR markers.

Authors:  Kaniz Wahida Sultana; Sumanta Das; Indrani Chandra; Anindita Roy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.