Literature DB >> 3126969

Problems with peer review and alternatives.

R Smith1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1988        PMID： 3126969      PMCID： PMC2545379          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.296.6624.774

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN： 0267-0623


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  An alternative funding mechanism.

Authors:  R Roy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Chernobyl fallout in size-fractionated aerosol.

Authors:  D T Jost; H W Gäggeler; U Baltensperger; B Zinder; P Haller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Nov 6-12       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Why do research on research?

Authors:  J Anderson; D C Evered
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-04       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Fraud in medicine.

Authors:  S Lock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-02-06

5.  Fraud in science.

Authors:  L Altman; L Melcher
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-06-25

6.  Chance and consensus in peer review.

Authors:  S Cole; J R Cole; G A Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728
  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Experts and evidence.

Authors:  R J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Chance, concurrence, and clustering. Analysis of reviewers' recommendations on 1,000 submissions to the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Authors:  B F Scharschmidt; A DeAmicis; P Bacchetti; M J Held
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  How reliable is peer review of scientific abstracts? Looking back at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine.

Authors:  H R Rubin; D A Redelmeier; A W Wu; E P Steinberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Contribution to scientific research in paediatrics in The Netherlands: evaluation according to subspeciality over a 10-year period.

Authors:  J A Verberkmoes; L A Monnens; J M Vossen; R S Weening
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Promoting research into peer review.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-16

6.  Publication practice in Taxonomy: Global inequalities and potential bias against negative results.

Authors:  Rodrigo Brincalepe Salvador; Daniel Caracanhas Cavallari; Douglas Rands; Barbara Mizumo Tomotani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.

Authors:  V Demicheli; C Di Pietrantonj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

8.  Does the committee peer review select the best applicants for funding? An investigation of the selection process for two European molecular biology organization programmes.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Gerlind Wallon; Anna Ledin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.