Literature DB >> 31269530

Copy-and-Paste in Medical Student Notes: Extent, Temporal Trends, and Relationship to Scholastic Performance.

Ken Monahan1, Cheng Ye2, Edward Gould3, Meng Xu4, Shi Huang4, Anderson Spickard2,5, S Trent Rosenbloom2,5,6, Joseph Coco2, Daniel Fabbri2, Bonnie Miller7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medical students may observe and subsequently perpetuate redundancy in clinical documentation, but the degree of redundancy in student notes and whether there is an association with scholastic performance are unknown.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to quantify redundancy, defined generally as the proportion of similar text between two strings, in medical student notes and evaluate the relationship between note redundancy and objective indicators of student performance.
METHODS: Notes generated by medical students rotating through their medicine clerkship during a single academic year at our institution were analyzed. A student-patient interaction (SPI) was defined as a history and physical and at least two contiguous progress notes authored by the same student during a single patient's hospitalization. For some students, SPI pairs were available from early and late in the clerkship. Redundancy between analogous sections of consecutive notes was calculated on a 0 to 100% scale and was derived from edit distance, the number of changes needed to transform one text string into another. Indicators of student performance included United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) scores.
RESULTS: Ninety-four single SPIs and 58 SPI pairs were analyzed. Redundancy in the assessment/plan section was high (40%) and increased within individual SPIs (to 60%; p < 0.001) and between SPI pairs over the course of the clerkship (by 30-40%; p < 0.001). Students in the lowest tertile of USMLE step II clinical knowledge scores had higher redundancy in the assessment/plan section than their classmates (67 ± 24% vs. 38 ± 22%; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: During the medicine clerkship, the assessment/plan section of medical student notes became more redundant over a patient's hospital course and as students gained clinical experience. These trends may be indicative of deficiencies in clinical knowledge or reasoning, as evidenced by performance on some standardized evaluations. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31269530      PMCID: PMC6609271          DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1692402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Clin Inform        ISSN: 1869-0327            Impact factor:   2.342


  17 in total

1.  A piece of my mind. Copy-and-paste.

Authors:  Robert E Hirschtick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Copy and paste: a remediable hazard of electronic health records.

Authors:  Eugenia L Siegler; Ronald Adelman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Automatic scoring of medical students' clinical notes to monitor learning in the workplace.

Authors:  Anderson Spickard; Heather Ridinger; Jesse Wrenn; Nathan O'brien; Adam Shpigel; Michael Wolf; Glenn Stein; Joshua Denny
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 4.  Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications.

Authors:  Sue Bowman
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2013-10-01

5.  Clinicians' reasoning as reflected in electronic clinical note-entry and reading/retrieval: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis.

Authors:  Tiago K Colicchio; James J Cimino
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Medical students' observations, practices, and attitudes regarding electronic health record documentation.

Authors:  Heather L Heiman; Sonya Rasminsky; Jennifer A Bierman; Daniel B Evans; Kathryn G Kinner; Julie Stamos; Zoran Martinovich; William C McGaghie
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.414

7.  Medical records that guide and teach.

Authors:  L L Weed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Copy/paste documentation of lifestyle counseling and glycemic control in patients with diabetes: true to form?

Authors:  Alexander Turchin; Saveli I Goldberg; Eugene Breydo; Maria Shubina; Jonathan S Einbinder
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-05-23

9.  Using language models to identify relevant new information in inpatient clinical notes.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Serguei V Pakhomov; Janet T Lee; Genevieve B Melton
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2014-11-14

10.  Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.

Authors:  C R Weir; J F Hurdle; M A Felgar; J M Hoffman; B Roth; J R Nebeker
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  4 in total

1.  Are specific elements of electronic health record use associated with clinician burnout more than others?

Authors:  Ross W Hilliard; Jacqueline Haskell; Rebekah L Gardner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  An Exploratory Study of Allied Health Students' Experiences of Electronic Medical Records During Placements.

Authors:  Melissa Therese Baysari; Jacqueline Wells; Ernest Ekpo; Meredith Makeham; Jonathan Penm; Nathaniel Alexander; Alexander Holden; Raj Ubeja; Sue McAllister
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Improved Medical Student Engagement with EHR Documentation following the 2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Billing Changes.

Authors:  Lindsay A Stevens; Natalie M Pageler; Jin S Hahn
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Restricted use of copy and paste in electronic health records potentially improves healthcare quality.

Authors:  Chun-Gu Cheng; Ding-Chung Wu; Jui-Cheng Lu; Chia-Peng Yu; Hong-Ling Lin; Mei-Chuen Wang; Chun-An Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 1.889

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.