Literature DB >> 31269509

Cancer Location in Upgrading and Detection after Transperineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy for Patients in Active Surveillance and Negative Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy.

Chung Un Lee1, Si Hyun Sung1, Chun Tae Jang1, Minyong Kang1, Hyun Hwan Sung1, Byong Chang Jeong1, Seong Il Seo1, Seong Soo Jeon1, Hyun Moo Lee1, Hwang Gyun Jeon2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the efficacy of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) for patients on active surveillance (AS) or those with previous negative transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-Bx).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients on AS and 60 patients with previous negative TRUS-Bx, which is a total of 159 patients who underwent TTMB from May 2017 to January 2019. Cancer location was analyzed with focus on the anterior and apex lesions of the prostate after TTMB. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging was performed before TTMB. Cancer location after TTMB in 138 patients, excluding 21 patients who were not eligible for analysis (4 patients on AS and 17 patients with previous negative TRUS-Bx) was compared with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSTM v2) score. Factors that may affect detecting cancer after TTMB with previous negative TRUS-Bx was analyzed using a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: In AS patients, 29 patients (29.3%) exhibited an upgrade in Gleason score (GS) after TTMB. Among them, 22 patients (75.9%) showed at the anterior or apex lesions. In patients with previous negative TRUS-Bx, 18 patients (30.0%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Among them, 13 patients (72.2%) exhibited cancer at the anterior or apex lesion. Among the 25 AS patients with PI-RADSTM score 1-2, 5 patients (20.0%) showed an upgrade in GS. Among the 26 patients with previous negative TRUS-Bx and PI-RADSTM score 1-2, 6 patients (23.1%) had cancer. In multivariate regression model, prostate volume (OR 0.951) was identified as the predictor for a positive biopsy result after TTMB with previous negative TRUS-Bx.
CONCLUSIONS: TTMB is efficient for patients on AS in the detection of upgraded cancer located in anterior or apex or those with previous negative TRUS-Bx in the detection of anterior or apex cancer. In PI-RADSTM score 1-2, a substantial proportion of patients after experienced upgrade in GS on AS patients or cancer detection on previous negative TRUS-Bx. Moreover, we identified prostate volume is the independent predictor for a positive biopsy result after TTMB with previous negative TRUS-Bx.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer; Transperineal; Transrectal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31269509     DOI: 10.1159/000501527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  4 in total

1.  Impact of delay from transperineal biopsy to radical prostatectomy upon objective measures of cancer control.

Authors:  Liang G Qu; Gregory Jack; Marlon Perera; Melanie Evans; Sue Evans; Damien Bolton; Nathan Papa
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-09-06

2.  Complementing the active surveillance criteria with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Tae Un Kim; Seung Ryong Baek; Won Hoon Song; Jong Kil Nam; Hyun Jung Lee; Sung Woo Park
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2020-11

3.  Utility of multiple core biopsies during transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy for patients with large prostates and PI-RADS 1-2 on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chung Un Lee; Jae Hoon Chung; Wan Song; Minyong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Can Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Be an Index to Distinguish Patients Who Can Omit Repeat Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Authors:  Jiwoong Yu; Youngjun Boo; Minyong Kang; Hyun Hwan Sung; Byong Chang Jeong; Seongil Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyunmoo Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.989

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.