BACKGROUND: In recent years, the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib has been successfully established in the therapy of advanced melanoma. Despite its superior efficacy, the use of vemurafenib is limited by frequent inflammatory cutaneous adverse events that affect patients' quality of life and may lead to dose reduction or even cessation of anti-tumor therapy. To date, the molecular and cellular mechanisms of vemurafenib-induced rashes have remained largely elusive. METHODS: In this study, we deployed immunohistochemistry, RT-qPCR, flow cytometry, lymphocyte activation tests, and different cell-free protein-interaction assays. RESULTS: We here demonstrate that vemurafenib inhibits the downstream signaling of the canonical pathway of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in vitro, thereby inducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, TNF) and chemokines (eg, CCL5). In line with these results, we observed an impaired expression of AhR-regulated genes (eg, CYP1A1) and an upregulation of the corresponding proinflammatory genes in vivo. Moreover, results of lymphocyte activation tests showed the absence of drug-specific T cells in respective patients. CONCLUSION: Taken together, we obtained no hint of an underlying sensitization against vemurafenib but found evidence suggesting that vemurafenib enhances proinflammatory responses by inhibition of canonical AhR signaling. Our findings contribute to our understanding of the central role of the AhR in skin inflammation and may point toward a potential role for topical AhR agonists in supportive cancer care.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib has been successfully established in the therapy of advanced melanoma. Despite its superior efficacy, the use of vemurafenib is limited by frequent inflammatory cutaneous adverse events that affect patients' quality of life and may lead to dose reduction or even cessation of anti-tumor therapy. To date, the molecular and cellular mechanisms of vemurafenib-induced rashes have remained largely elusive. METHODS: In this study, we deployed immunohistochemistry, RT-qPCR, flow cytometry, lymphocyte activation tests, and different cell-free protein-interaction assays. RESULTS: We here demonstrate that vemurafenib inhibits the downstream signaling of the canonical pathway of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in vitro, thereby inducing the expression of proinflammatory cytokines (eg, TNF) and chemokines (eg, CCL5). In line with these results, we observed an impaired expression of AhR-regulated genes (eg, CYP1A1) and an upregulation of the corresponding proinflammatory genes in vivo. Moreover, results of lymphocyte activation tests showed the absence of drug-specific T cells in respective patients. CONCLUSION: Taken together, we obtained no hint of an underlying sensitization against vemurafenib but found evidence suggesting that vemurafenib enhances proinflammatory responses by inhibition of canonical AhR signaling. Our findings contribute to our understanding of the central role of the AhR in skin inflammation and may point toward a potential role for topical AhR agonists in supportive cancer care.
Authors: B Homey; W Wang; H Soto; M E Buchanan; A Wiesenborn; D Catron; A Müller; T K McClanahan; M C Dieu-Nosjean; R Orozco; T Ruzicka; P Lehmann; E Oldham; A Zlotnik Journal: J Immunol Date: 2000-04-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Michael S Denison; Jane M Rogers; S Renee Rushing; Carol L Jones; Selwyna C Tetangco; Sharon Heath-Pagliuso Journal: Curr Protoc Toxicol Date: 2002-05
Authors: Jeffrey A Sosman; Kevin B Kim; Lynn Schuchter; Rene Gonzalez; Anna C Pavlick; Jeffrey S Weber; Grant A McArthur; Thomas E Hutson; Stergios J Moschos; Keith T Flaherty; Peter Hersey; Richard Kefford; Donald Lawrence; Igor Puzanov; Karl D Lewis; Ravi K Amaravadi; Bartosz Chmielowski; H Jeffrey Lawrence; Yu Shyr; Fei Ye; Jiang Li; Keith B Nolop; Richard J Lee; Andrew K Joe; Antoni Ribas Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ellen H van den Bogaard; Judith G M Bergboer; Mieke Vonk-Bergers; Ivonne M J J van Vlijmen-Willems; Stanleyson V Hato; Pieter G M van der Valk; Jens Michael Schröder; Irma Joosten; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Joost Schalkwijk Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Katrin Frauenstein; Julia Tigges; Anatoly A Soshilov; Sarah Kado; Nadeshda Raab; Ellen Fritsche; Judith Haendeler; Michael S Denison; Christoph F A Vogel; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann Journal: Arch Toxicol Date: 2014-08-01 Impact factor: 5.153
Authors: Joshua D Mezrich; Linh P Nguyen; Greg Kennedy; Manabu Nukaya; John H Fechner; Xiaoji Zhang; Yongna Xing; Christopher A Bradfield Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: D M Barrios; G S Phillips; A Freites-Martinez; M Hsu; K Ciccolini; A Skripnik Lucas; M A Marchetti; A M Rossi; E H Lee; L Deng; A Markova; P L Myskowski; M E Lacouture Journal: J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Heike C Hawerkamp; Alina Domdey; Lisa Radau; Philipp Sewerin; Péter Oláh; Bernhard Homey; Stephan Meller Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2021-05-21 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Christian Vogeley; Natalie C Sondermann; Selina Woeste; Afaque A Momin; Viola Gilardino; Frederick Hartung; Markus Heinen; Sophia K Maaß; Melina Mescher; Marius Pollet; Katharina M Rolfes; Christoph F A Vogel; Andrea Rossi; Dieter Lang; Stefan T Arold; Motoki Nakamura; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Christian Vogeley; Charlotte Esser; Thomas Tüting; Jean Krutmann; Thomas Haarmann-Stemmann Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 5.923