Literature DB >> 31268614

The Energetic Significance of Metallophilic Interactions.

Qingshu Zheng1, Stefan Borsley1, Gary S Nichol1, Fernanda Duarte1,2, Scott L Cockroft1.   

Abstract

Metallophilic interactions are increasingly recognized as playing an important role in molecular assembly, catalysis, and bio-imaging. However, present knowledge of these interactions is largely derived from solid-state structures and gas-phase computational studies rather than quantitative experimental measurements. Here, we have experimentally quantified the role of aurophilic (AuI ⋅⋅⋅AuI ), platinophilic (PtII ⋅⋅⋅PtII ), palladophilic (PdII ⋅⋅⋅PdII ), and nickelophilic (NiII ⋅⋅⋅NiII ) interactions in self-association and ligand-exchange processes. All of these metallophilic interactions were found to be too weak to be well-expressed in several solvents. Computational energy decomposition analyses supported the experimental finding that metallophilic interactions are overall weak, meaning that favorable dispersion and orbital hybridization contributions from M⋅⋅⋅M binding are largely outcompeted by electrostatic or dispersion interactions involving ligand or solvent molecules. This combined experimental and computational study provides a general understanding of metallophilic interactions and indicates that great care must be taken to avoid over-attributing the energetic significance of metallophilic interactions.
© 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Keywords:  computational chemistry; metal-metal interactions; metallophilic interactions; noncovalent interactions; supramolecular chemistry

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268614     DOI: 10.1002/anie.201904207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


  8 in total

1.  Strong metal-metal Pauli repulsion leads to repulsive metallophilicity in closed-shell d8 and d10 organometallic complexes.

Authors:  Qingyun Wan; Jun Yang; Wai-Pong To; Chi-Ming Che
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Aurophilic Interactions Studied by Quantum Crystallography.

Authors:  Sylwia Pawlȩdzio; Maura Malinska; Florian Kleemiss; Simon Grabowsky; Krzysztof Woźniak
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.165

3.  Closed-shell d10-d10 in [AuCl(CNR)] n and [AuCl(CO)] n (n = 1, 2; R = -H, -CH3, -Cy) complexes: quantum chemistry study of their electronic and optical properties.

Authors:  Fernando Mendizabal; Sebastián Miranda-Rojas
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  A Novel Class of Cyclometalated Platinum(II) Complexes for Solution-Processable OLEDs.

Authors:  Dominique Roberto; Alessia Colombo; Claudia Dragonetti; Francesco Fagnani; Massimo Cocchi; Daniele Marinotto
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Polyoxoplatinates as covalently dynamic electron sponges and molecular electronics materials.

Authors:  Aleksandar Kondinski; Mahdi Ghorbani-Asl
Journal:  Nanoscale Adv       Date:  2021-08-13

6.  Aggregation-induced phosphorescence sensitization in two heptanuclear and decanuclear gold-silver sandwich clusters.

Authors:  Zhou Lu; Yu-Jie Yang; Wen-Xiu Ni; Mian Li; Yifang Zhao; Yong-Liang Huang; Dong Luo; Xiaoping Wang; Mohammad A Omary; Dan Li
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Triple the fun: tris(ferrocenyl)arene-based gold(i) complexes for redox-switchable catalysis.

Authors:  Axel Straube; Peter Coburger; Luis Dütsch; Evamarie Hey-Hawkins
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 8.  Excimer and Exciplex Formation in Gold(I) Complexes Preconditioned by Aurophilic Interactions.

Authors:  Hubert Schmidbaur; Helgard G Raubenheimer
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 16.823

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.