Literature DB >> 31268566

What Is the Psychosocial Impact of Providing Genetic and Genomic Health Information to Individuals? An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Christopher H Wade.   

Abstract

Optimistic predictions that genetic and genomic testing will provide health benefits have been tempered by the concern that individuals who receive their results may experience negative psychosocial outcomes. This potential ethical and clinical concern has prompted extensive conversations between policy-makers, health researchers, ethicists, and the general public. Fortunately, the psychosocial consequences of such testing are subject to empirical investigation, and over the past quarter century, research that clarifies some of the types, likelihood, and severity of potential harms from learning the results of the testing has accumulated. I aim to provide an overview of the findings of this research by looking at selected systematic reviews. This will convey the gist of the literature's quality and coverage, reveal gaps in existing knowledge, and highlight promising areas for future scholarship.
© 2019 The Hastings Center.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268566     DOI: 10.1002/hast.1021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep        ISSN: 0093-0334            Impact factor:   2.683


  12 in total

1.  Qualitative Research on Expanded Prenatal and Newborn Screening: Robust but Marginalized.

Authors:  Rachel Grob
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Psychosocial Effects of Multigene Panel Testing in the Context of Cancer Genomics.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Genetic Testing in the Pediatric Nephrology Clinic: Understanding Families' Experiences.

Authors:  Suzanne M Nevin; Jordana McLoone; Claire E Wakefield; Sean E Kennedy; Hugh J McCarthy
Journal:  J Pediatr Genet       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  The role of causal knowledge in stigma considerations in African genomics research: Views of South African Xhosa people.

Authors:  Olivia P Matshabane; Megan M Campbell; Marlyn C Faure; Paul S Appelbaum; Patricia A Marshall; Dan J Stein; Jantina de Vries
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 5.  Genomics Education in the Era of Personal Genomics: Academic, Professional, and Public Considerations.

Authors:  Kiara V Whitley; Josie A Tueller; K Scott Weber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Receiving results of uncertain clinical relevance from population genetic screening: systematic review & meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Faye Johnson; Fiona Ulph; Rhona MacLeod; Kevin W Southern
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 5.351

7.  GeneLiFT: A novel test to facilitate rapid screening of genetic literacy in a diverse population undergoing genetic testing.

Authors:  Hila Milo Rasouly; Nicole Cuneo; Maddalena Marasa; Natalia DeMaria; Debanjana Chatterjee; Jacqueline J Thompson; David A Fasel; Julia Wynn; Wendy K Chung; Paul Appelbaum; Chunhua Weng; Suzanne Bakken; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The good, the bad, and the utilitarian: attitudes towards genetic testing and implications for disability.

Authors:  Alexandra Maftei; Oana Dănilă
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-01-17

9.  A Web Screening on Training Initiatives in Cancer Genomics for Healthcare Professionals.

Authors:  Ilda Hoxhaj; Flavia Beccia; Giovanna Elisa Calabrò; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Laura Torgerson; Hadley Stevens Smith; Stacey Pereira
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.