Literature DB >> 31268144

Sponge Behavior and the Chemical Basis of Responses: A Post-Genomic View.

Sally P Leys1, Jasmine L Mah1,2, Paul R McGill3, Laura Hamonic1, Fabio C De Leo4,5, Amanda S Kahn1,3,6.   

Abstract

Sponges perceive and respond to a range of stimuli. How they do this is still difficult to pin down despite now having transcriptomes and genomes of an array of species. Here we evaluate the current understanding of sponge behavior and present new observations on sponge activity in situ. We also explore biosynthesis pathways available to sponges from data in genomes/transcriptomes of sponges and other non-bilaterians with a focus on exploring the role of chemical signaling pathways mediating sponge behavior and how such chemical signal pathways may have evolved. Sponge larvae respond to light but opsins are not used, nor is there a common photoreceptor molecule or mechanism used across sponge groups. Other cues are gravity and chemicals. In situ recordings of behavior show that both shallow and deep-water sponges move a lot over minutes and hours, and correlation of behavior with temperature, pressure, oxygen, and water movement suggests that at least one sponge responds to changes in atmospheric pressure. The sensors for these cues as far as we know are individual cells and, except in the case of electrical signaling in Hexactinellida, these most likely act as independent effectors, generating a whole-body reaction by the global reach of the stimulus to all parts of the animal. We found no evidence for use of conventional neurotransmitters such as serotonin and dopamine. Intriguingly, some chemicals synthesized by symbiont microbes could mean other more complex signaling occurs, but how that interplay might happen is not understood. Our review suggests chemical signaling pathways found in sponges do not reflect loss of a more complex set.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268144     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icz122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  4 in total

1.  Uncovering cognitive similarities and differences, conservation and innovation.

Authors:  Michael Levin; Fred Keijzer; Pamela Lyon; Detlev Arendt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Neural versus alternative integrative systems: molecular insights into origins of neurotransmitters.

Authors:  Leonid L Moroz; Daria Y Romanova; Andrea B Kohn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Is ABA the exogenous vector of interplant drought cuing?

Authors:  Omer Falik; Ariel Novoplansky
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2022-12-31

4.  An Interesting Molecule: γ-Aminobutyric Acid. What Can We Learn from Hydra Polyps?

Authors:  Paola Pierobon
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.