C Marchiò1, M Scaltriti2, M Ladanyi3, A J Iafrate4, F Bibeau5, M Dietel6, J F Hechtman3, T Troiani7, F López-Rios8, J-Y Douillard9, F Andrè10, J S Reis-Filho3. 1. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin; Division of Pathology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy. 2. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Human Oncology & Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York. 4. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France. 6. Institute of Pathology, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany. 7. Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy. 8. Pathology & Targeted Therapies Laboratory, HM Sanchinarro University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. 9. European Society for Medical Oncology, Lugano, Switzerland. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: education@esmo.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are present in a plethora of malignancies across different histologies. These fusions represent the most frequent mechanism of oncogenic activation of these receptor tyrosine kinases, and biomarkers for the use of TRK small molecule inhibitors. Given the varying frequency of NTRK1/2/3 fusions, crucial to the administration of NTRK inhibitors is the development of optimal approaches for the detection of human cancers harbouring activating NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts from several Institutions were recruited by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) to review the available methods for the detection of NTRK gene fusions, their potential applications, and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes in human malignancies. A consensus on the most reasonable strategy to adopt when screening for NTRK fusions in oncologic patients was sought, and further reviewed and approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership. RESULTS: The main techniques employed for NTRK fusion gene detection include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and both RNA-based and DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Each technique has advantages and limitations, and the choice of assays for screening and final diagnosis should also take into account the resources and clinical context. CONCLUSION: In tumours where NTRK fusions are highly recurrent, FISH, RT-PCR or RNA-based sequencing panels can be used as confirmatory techniques, whereas in the scenario of testing an unselected population where NTRK1/2/3 fusions are uncommon, either front-line sequencing (preferentially RNA-sequencing) or screening by immunohistochemistry followed by sequencing of positive cases should be pursued.
BACKGROUND:NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are present in a plethora of malignancies across different histologies. These fusions represent the most frequent mechanism of oncogenic activation of these receptor tyrosine kinases, and biomarkers for the use of TRK small molecule inhibitors. Given the varying frequency of NTRK1/2/3 fusions, crucial to the administration of NTRK inhibitors is the development of optimal approaches for the detection of humancancers harbouring activating NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts from several Institutions were recruited by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) to review the available methods for the detection of NTRK gene fusions, their potential applications, and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes in humanmalignancies. A consensus on the most reasonable strategy to adopt when screening for NTRK fusions in oncologic patients was sought, and further reviewed and approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership. RESULTS: The main techniques employed for NTRK fusion gene detection include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and both RNA-based and DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Each technique has advantages and limitations, and the choice of assays for screening and final diagnosis should also take into account the resources and clinical context. CONCLUSION: In tumours where NTRK fusions are highly recurrent, FISH, RT-PCR or RNA-based sequencing panels can be used as confirmatory techniques, whereas in the scenario of testing an unselected population where NTRK1/2/3 fusions are uncommon, either front-line sequencing (preferentially RNA-sequencing) or screening by immunohistochemistry followed by sequencing of positive cases should be pursued.
Authors: Ezra Y Rosen; Debra A Goldman; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ryma Benayed; Alison M Schram; Emiliano Cocco; Sophie Shifman; Yixiao Gong; Ritika Kundra; James P Solomon; Alberto Bardelli; Maurizio Scaltriti; Alexander Drilon; Alexia Iasonos; Barry S Taylor; David M Hyman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: David S Hong; Steven G DuBois; Shivaani Kummar; Anna F Farago; Catherine M Albert; Kristoffer S Rohrberg; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; Jordan D Berlin; Noah Federman; Leo Mascarenhas; Birgit Geoerger; Afshin Dowlati; Alberto S Pappo; Stefan Bielack; François Doz; Ray McDermott; Jyoti D Patel; Russell J Schilder; Makoto Tahara; Stefan M Pfister; Olaf Witt; Marc Ladanyi; Erin R Rudzinski; Shivani Nanda; Barrett H Childs; Theodore W Laetsch; David M Hyman; Alexander Drilon Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Alessandro Russo; Ana Rita Lopes; Michael G McCusker; Sandra Gimenez Garrigues; Giuseppina R Ricciardi; Katherine E Arensmeyer; Katherine A Scilla; Ranee Mehra; Christian Rolfo Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.075