Literature DB >> 31268127

ESMO recommendations on the standard methods to detect NTRK fusions in daily practice and clinical research.

C Marchiò1, M Scaltriti2, M Ladanyi3, A J Iafrate4, F Bibeau5, M Dietel6, J F Hechtman3, T Troiani7, F López-Rios8, J-Y Douillard9, F Andrè10, J S Reis-Filho3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 fusions are present in a plethora of malignancies across different histologies. These fusions represent the most frequent mechanism of oncogenic activation of these receptor tyrosine kinases, and biomarkers for the use of TRK small molecule inhibitors. Given the varying frequency of NTRK1/2/3 fusions, crucial to the administration of NTRK inhibitors is the development of optimal approaches for the detection of human cancers harbouring activating NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts from several Institutions were recruited by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Translational Research and Precision Medicine Working Group (TR and PM WG) to review the available methods for the detection of NTRK gene fusions, their potential applications, and strategies for the implementation of a rational approach for the detection of NTRK1/2/3 fusion genes in human malignancies. A consensus on the most reasonable strategy to adopt when screening for NTRK fusions in oncologic patients was sought, and further reviewed and approved by the ESMO TR and PM WG and the ESMO leadership.
RESULTS: The main techniques employed for NTRK fusion gene detection include immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), RT-PCR, and both RNA-based and DNA-based next generation sequencing (NGS). Each technique has advantages and limitations, and the choice of assays for screening and final diagnosis should also take into account the resources and clinical context.
CONCLUSION: In tumours where NTRK fusions are highly recurrent, FISH, RT-PCR or RNA-based sequencing panels can be used as confirmatory techniques, whereas in the scenario of testing an unselected population where NTRK1/2/3 fusions are uncommon, either front-line sequencing (preferentially RNA-sequencing) or screening by immunohistochemistry followed by sequencing of positive cases should be pursued.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NTRK1; NTRK2; NTRK3; fluorescence in situ hybridisation; immunohistochemistry; next-generation sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31268127     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  74 in total

Review 1.  TRK Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Guilherme Harada; Aline Bobato Lara Gongora; Cesar Martins da Costa; Fernando Costa Santini
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2020-04-23

2.  TRK Fusions Are Enriched in Cancers with Uncommon Histologies and the Absence of Canonical Driver Mutations.

Authors:  Ezra Y Rosen; Debra A Goldman; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Ryma Benayed; Alison M Schram; Emiliano Cocco; Sophie Shifman; Yixiao Gong; Ritika Kundra; James P Solomon; Alberto Bardelli; Maurizio Scaltriti; Alexander Drilon; Alexia Iasonos; Barry S Taylor; David M Hyman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Detecting and Targeting NTRK Fusions in Cancer in the Era of Tumor Agnostic Oncology.

Authors:  Kristoffer S Rohrberg; Ulrik Lassen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive solid tumours: a pooled analysis of three phase 1/2 clinical trials.

Authors:  David S Hong; Steven G DuBois; Shivaani Kummar; Anna F Farago; Catherine M Albert; Kristoffer S Rohrberg; Cornelis M van Tilburg; Ramamoorthy Nagasubramanian; Jordan D Berlin; Noah Federman; Leo Mascarenhas; Birgit Geoerger; Afshin Dowlati; Alberto S Pappo; Stefan Bielack; François Doz; Ray McDermott; Jyoti D Patel; Russell J Schilder; Makoto Tahara; Stefan M Pfister; Olaf Witt; Marc Ladanyi; Erin R Rudzinski; Shivani Nanda; Barrett H Childs; Theodore W Laetsch; David M Hyman; Alexander Drilon
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 5.  Current and emerging biomarkers in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M K C Lee; J M Loree
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Routine Molecular Pathology Diagnostics in Precision Oncology.

Authors:  Carina Wenzel; Sylvia Herold; Martin Wermke; Daniela E Aust; Gustavo B Baretton
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 7.  New Targets in Lung Cancer (Excluding EGFR, ALK, ROS1).

Authors:  Alessandro Russo; Ana Rita Lopes; Michael G McCusker; Sandra Gimenez Garrigues; Giuseppina R Ricciardi; Katherine E Arensmeyer; Katherine A Scilla; Ranee Mehra; Christian Rolfo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 8.  Problematic breast tumors reassessed in light of novel molecular data.

Authors:  Fresia Pareja; Britta Weigelt; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Applicability of pan-TRK immunohistochemistry for identification of NTRK fusions in lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Simon Strohmeier; Iva Brcic; Helmut Popper; Bernadette Liegl-Atzwanger; Jörg Lindenmann; Luka Brcic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Molecular biomarker testing for non-small cell lung cancer: consensus statement of the Korean Cardiopulmonary Pathology Study Group.

Authors:  Sunhee Chang; Hyo Sup Shim; Tae Jung Kim; Yoon-La Choi; Wan Seop Kim; Dong Hoon Shin; Lucia Kim; Heae Surng Park; Geon Kook Lee; Chang Hun Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2021-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.