Literature DB >> 31267212

The impact of anesthesia and surgical provider characteristics on outcomes after spine surgery.

Lauren A Wilson1, Megan Fiasconaro1, Jashvant Poeran2,3, Jiabin Liu1, Federico Girardi4, Stavros G Memtsoudis5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Information regarding the impact of provider characteristics on perioperative outcomes in the spine surgery setting is limited. Existing studies primarily consider the impact of surgical provider volume. This analysis sought to identify the impact of anesthesiologist and surgeon volume and experience as well as anesthesia care team composition on adverse outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) and posterior lumbar fusions (PLF).
METHODS: We identified 5900 patients who underwent ACDF or PLF procedures at a high-volume orthopedic institution from 2005 to 2014. Provider characteristics of interest were anesthesiologist and surgeon volume and experience along with anesthesia care team composition. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the outcomes of any complication, cardiopulmonary complication, and prolonged length of stay (> 7 days). Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to determine how much variation in outcomes could be explained by provider characteristics.
RESULTS: There were no significant relationships between provider characteristics and perioperative outcomes among ACDF patients. Within the PLF cohort, surgeon annual case volume > 25 was associated with decreased odds of prolonged length of stay, while anesthesia resident involvement was associated with increased odds of prolonged length of stay. Surgeon characteristics explained the greatest proportion of variation in outcomes while anesthesiologist characteristics explained the least.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia provider volume and experience did not significantly impact the odds of adverse outcome for ACDF and PLF patients. Higher surgeon volume was exclusively associated with decreased odds of prolonged length of stay following PLF. Further study is necessary to determine if these relationships persist in a less-specialized setting. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesiologists; Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Case volume; Posterior lumbar fusion; Surgeons

Year:  2019        PMID: 31267212     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06055-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  12 in total

1.  Surgical mortality and type of anesthesia provider.

Authors:  Michael Pine; Kathleen D Holt; You-Bei Lou
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  2003-04

2.  The impact of resident involvement on post-operative morbidity and mortality following orthopaedic procedures: a study of 43,343 cases.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Jose A Serrano; Brian R Waterman; Julia O Bader; Philip J Belmont
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases.

Authors:  R A Deyo; D C Cherkin; M A Ciol
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Complication rates are reduced for revision adult spine deformity surgery among high-volume hospitals and surgeons.

Authors:  Justin C Paul; Baron S Lonner; Vadim Goz; Jeffery Weinreb; Raj Karia; Courtney S Toombs; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  The impact of provider volume on the outcomes after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock; Michelle J Clarke; Timothy F Witham; Daniel M Sciubba; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Surgeon Procedure Volume and Complication Rates in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions: Analysis of a National Longitudinal Database.

Authors:  Tyler Cole; Anand Veeravagu; Michael Zhang; John K Ratliff
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Establishing benchmarks for the volume-outcome relationship for common lumbar spine surgical procedures.

Authors:  Andrew J Schoenfeld; Daniel J Sturgeon; Camden B Burns; Tyler J Hunt; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 8.  Orthopaedic procedure volume and patient outcomes: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nina Shervin; Harry E Rubash; Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Effect of surgeon and anesthesiologist volume on surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Faiz Gani; Yuhree Kim; Matthew J Weiss; Martin A Makary; Christopher L Wolfgang; Kenzo Hirose; John L Cameron; Jack O Wasey; Steven M Frank; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.

Authors:  Xavier Robin; Natacha Turck; Alexandre Hainard; Natalia Tiberti; Frédérique Lisacek; Jean-Charles Sanchez; Markus Müller
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.307

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Safer anesthesia and duty hour limits: are handovers of personnel allowed?]

Authors:  Christina Massoth; Melanie Meersch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in European spine journal, 2019.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.