Literature DB >> 31266426

Universal modesty in signal-burying games.

Tadeg Quillien1.   

Abstract

Why would individuals hide positive information about themselves? Evolutionary game theorists have recently developed the signal-burying game as a simple model to shed light on this puzzle. They have shown that the game has an equilibrium where some agents are better off deliberately reducing the visibility of the signal by which they broadcast their positive traits. However, this equilibrium also features individuals who fully broadcast their positive traits. Here, we show that the signal-burying framework can also explain modesty norms that everyone adheres to: the game contains an equilibrium where all agents who send a signal voluntarily reduce its conspicuousness. Surprisingly, the stability of the two kinds of equilibria rely on very different principles. The equilibrium where some agents brag is stable because of costly signalling dynamics. By contrast, the universal modesty equilibrium exists because buried signals contain probabilistic information about a sender's type, and receivers make optimal use of this information. In the latter equilibrium, burying a signal can be understood as a handicap which makes the signal more honest, but honesty is not achieved through standard costly signalling dynamics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agent-based model; evolutionary game theory; signalling

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31266426      PMCID: PMC6650712          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0985

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

Review 1.  Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?

Authors:  Steven J Heine; Darrin R Lehman; Hazel Rose Markus; Shinobu Kitayama
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: inter- and intranational differences.

Authors:  M Eid; E Diener
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-11

3.  Mate selection-a selection for a handicap.

Authors:  A Zahavi
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

5.  The signal-burying game can explain why we obscure positive traits and good deeds.

Authors:  Moshe Hoffman; Christian Hilbe; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2018-05-28

6.  Cross-cultural regularities in the cognitive architecture of pride.

Authors:  Daniel Sznycer; Laith Al-Shawaf; Yoella Bereby-Meyer; Oliver Scott Curry; Delphine De Smet; Elsa Ermer; Sangin Kim; Sunhwa Kim; Norman P Li; Maria Florencia Lopez Seal; Jennifer McClung; Jiaqing O; Yohsuke Ohtsubo; Tadeg Quillien; Max Schaub; Aaron Sell; Florian van Leeuwen; Leda Cosmides; John Tooby
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Mistakes allow evolutionary stability in the repeated prisoner's dilemma game.

Authors:  R Boyd
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1989-01-09       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Maimonides' ladder: States of mutual knowledge and the perception of charitability.

Authors:  Julian De Freitas; Peter DeScioli; Kyle A Thomas; Steven Pinker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2018-10-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.