W O Zimmermann1, E W P Bakker2. 1. Department of Military Sports Medicine, Royal Netherlands Army, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: wo.zimmermann@mindef.nl. 2. University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies in our department demonstrated that gait retraining as part of a conservative treatment program for service members with exercise-related leg pain can lead to persistent changes in vertical ground reaction forces while running in shoes and boots. It is not known which gait retraining cue has the largest effect and whether a combination of cues is advantageous. METHODS: During a single gait retraining session, 12 male heel striking patients were given three cues in isolation: Cue 1. Change to a ball-of-foot strike; Cue 2. Increase cadence to 180 steps per minute; Cue 3. Stand up taller; and finally, all three cues combined. Runs were performed on an instrumented treadmill at 10 km/h, 1% incline and in running shoes. The three cues were randomly introduced. Measurements, taken during 30-second episodes, were stride length, cadence, and six force variables: maximum force (N) and maximum pressure (N/cm2) on the heel, mid-foot and fore-foot. FINDINGS: Each cue, i.e., each change in running technique, caused a different pattern of changes among the six force variables, mostly reductions. In isolation, cue 1 produced the largest reduction of force and pressure on the heel, resulting percentages 45.8 and 67.2 respectively (p = 0.00, p = 0.00). Overall, the combination of cues 1 + 2 + 3 ranked first in reducing forces for four of the six force variables. INTERPRETATION: Three commonly used gait retraining cues, when applied in isolation, all resulted in a reduction of most vertical ground reaction forces. The combination of the three cues is advantageous.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies in our department demonstrated that gait retraining as part of a conservative treatment program for service members with exercise-related leg pain can lead to persistent changes in vertical ground reaction forces while running in shoes and boots. It is not known which gait retraining cue has the largest effect and whether a combination of cues is advantageous. METHODS: During a single gait retraining session, 12 male heel striking patients were given three cues in isolation: Cue 1. Change to a ball-of-foot strike; Cue 2. Increase cadence to 180 steps per minute; Cue 3. Stand up taller; and finally, all three cues combined. Runs were performed on an instrumented treadmill at 10 km/h, 1% incline and in running shoes. The three cues were randomly introduced. Measurements, taken during 30-second episodes, were stride length, cadence, and six force variables: maximum force (N) and maximum pressure (N/cm2) on the heel, mid-foot and fore-foot. FINDINGS: Each cue, i.e., each change in running technique, caused a different pattern of changes among the six force variables, mostly reductions. In isolation, cue 1 produced the largest reduction of force and pressure on the heel, resulting percentages 45.8 and 67.2 respectively (p = 0.00, p = 0.00). Overall, the combination of cues 1 + 2 + 3 ranked first in reducing forces for four of the six force variables. INTERPRETATION: Three commonly used gait retraining cues, when applied in isolation, all resulted in a reduction of most vertical ground reaction forces. The combination of the three cues is advantageous.