| Literature DB >> 31265271 |
Curtis Balusek, Hyea Hwang, Chun Hon Lau1, Karl Lundquist, Anthony Hazel, Anna Pavlova, Diane L Lynch2, Patricia H Reggio2, Yi Wang1, James C Gumbart.
Abstract
The time step of atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is determined by the fastest motions in the system and is typically limited to 2 fs. An increasingly popular approach is to increase the mass of the hydrogen atoms to ∼3 amu and decrease the mass of the parent atom by an equivalent amount. This approach, known as hydrogen-mass repartitioning (HMR), permits time steps up to 4 fs with reasonable simulation stability. While HMR has been applied in many published studies to date, it has not been extensively tested for membrane-containing systems. Here, we compare the results of simulations of a variety of membranes and membrane-protein systems run using a 2 fs time step and a 4 fs time step with HMR. For pure membrane systems, we find almost no difference in structural properties, such as area-per-lipid, electron density profiles, and order parameters, although there are differences in kinetic properties such as the diffusion constant. Conductance through a porin in an applied field, partitioning of a small peptide, hydrogen-bond dynamics, and membrane mixing show very little dependence on HMR and the time step. We also tested a 9 Å cutoff as compared to the standard CHARMM cutoff of 12 Å, finding significant deviations in many properties tested. We conclude that HMR is a valid approach for membrane systems, but a 9 Å cutoff is not.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31265271 PMCID: PMC7271963 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Chem Theory Comput ISSN: 1549-9618 Impact factor: 6.006