Matt Aboudara1, Lance Roller1, Otis Rickman1, Robert J Lentz1, Jasleen Pannu2, Heidi Chen3, Fabien Maldonado1. 1. Division of Allergy, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 2. The Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is inferior to that of computed tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy for pulmonary nodules. One explanation for this is divergence between the nodule location on the pre-procedure CT scan and its actual location during the procedure. Fluoroscopic ENB (F-ENB) consists of digital tomosynthesis using a conventional C-arm to re-register the target lesion based on near real-time imaging. We performed a retrospective review of ENB cases at our institution before and after introduction of F-ENB to assess diagnostic yield. METHODS: All consecutive ENB procedures performed at our institution from 25 December 2017 to 25 August 2018 were reviewed. F-ENB was introduced on 25 April 2018. Two cohorts were analysed: standard ENB (S-ENB) from 25 December 2017 to 24 April 2018 and F-ENB from 25 April 2018 to 25 August 2018. All procedural, demographic and diagnostic data were collected. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, Wilcoxon test and Student's t-test were used where appropriate. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with diagnostic yield. RESULTS: A total of 101 and 67 nodules were biopsied in the S-ENB and F-ENB groups, respectively. Diagnostic yield was 54% in S-ENB cohort and 79% in the F-ENB group (P = 0.0019). Factors independently associated with a positive diagnosis were F-ENB and a positive radial ultrasound view (odds ratio (OR): 3.57, 95% CI: 1.56-8.18 and OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.37-11.05, respectively). Complications were minimal (pneumothorax: 1.5%). CONCLUSION: The use of F-ENB may increase the diagnostic yield of ENB and has a low complication rate.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The diagnostic yield of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is inferior to that of computed tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy for pulmonary nodules. One explanation for this is divergence between the nodule location on the pre-procedure CT scan and its actual location during the procedure. Fluoroscopic ENB (F-ENB) consists of digital tomosynthesis using a conventional C-arm to re-register the target lesion based on near real-time imaging. We performed a retrospective review of ENB cases at our institution before and after introduction of F-ENB to assess diagnostic yield. METHODS: All consecutive ENB procedures performed at our institution from 25 December 2017 to 25 August 2018 were reviewed. F-ENB was introduced on 25 April 2018. Two cohorts were analysed: standard ENB (S-ENB) from 25 December 2017 to 24 April 2018 and F-ENB from 25 April 2018 to 25 August 2018. All procedural, demographic and diagnostic data were collected. Descriptive statistics, chi-square, Wilcoxon test and Student's t-test were used where appropriate. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with diagnostic yield. RESULTS: A total of 101 and 67 nodules were biopsied in the S-ENB and F-ENB groups, respectively. Diagnostic yield was 54% in S-ENB cohort and 79% in the F-ENB group (P = 0.0019). Factors independently associated with a positive diagnosis were F-ENB and a positive radial ultrasound view (odds ratio (OR): 3.57, 95% CI: 1.56-8.18 and OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.37-11.05, respectively). Complications were minimal (pneumothorax: 1.5%). CONCLUSION: The use of F-ENB may increase the diagnostic yield of ENB and has a low complication rate.
Authors: Thomas R Gildea; Erik E Folch; Sandeep J Khandhar; Michael A Pritchett; Gregory P LeMense; Philip A Linden; Douglas A Arenberg; Otis B Rickman; Amit K Mahajan; Jaspal Singh; Joseph Cicenia; Atul C Mehta; Haiying Lin; Jennifer S Mattingley Journal: J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol Date: 2021-07-01