| Literature DB >> 31265108 |
Estefania Sanchez-Rodriguez1, Cristina Benavides-Reyes1,2, Cibele Torres3, Nazaret Dominguez-Gasca1, Ana I Garcia-Ruiz3, Santiago Gonzalez-Lopez2, Alejandro B Rodriguez-Navarro1.
Abstract
Broiler chickens have an extreme physiology (rapid growth rates) that challenges the correct bone mineralization, being an interesting animal model for studying the development of bone pathologies. This work studies in detail how the mineralization, chemistry, and structural organization of tibiae bone in broiler chickens change with age during the first 5 wk (37 D) from hatching until acquiring the final weight for slaughter. During the early growth phase (first 2 wk), the rapid addition of bone tissue does not allow for bone organic matrix to fully mineralize and mature, and seems to be a critical period for bone development at which bone mineralization cannot keep pace with the rapid growth of bones. The low degree of bone mineralization and large porosity of cortical bone at this period might be responsible of leg deformation and/or other skeletal abnormalities commonly observed in these birds. Later, cortical bone porosity gradually decreases and the cortical bone became fully mineralized (65%) at 37 D of age. At the same time, bone mineral acquires the composition of mature bone tissue (decreased amount of carbonate, higher crystallinity, Ca/P = 1.68). However, the mineral part was still poorly organized even at 37 D. The oriented fraction was about 0.45 which means that more than half of apatite crystals within the mineral are randomly oriented. Mineral organization (crystal orientation) had an important contribution to bone-breaking strength. Nevertheless, locally determined (at tibia mid-shaft) bone properties (i.e., cortical thickness, crystal orientation) has only a moderate correlation (R2 = 0.33) with bone breaking strength probably due to large and highly heterogeneous porosity of bone that acts as structural defects. On the other hand, the total amount of mineral (a global property) measured by total ash content was the best predictor for breaking strength (R2 = 0.49). Knowledge acquired in this study could help in designing strategies to improve bone quality and reduce the incidence of skeletal problems in broiler chickens that have important welfare and economic implications.Entities:
Keywords: bone quality; broiler; growth disorders; osteoporosis; tibiae
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31265108 PMCID: PMC6771771 DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez363
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Figure 1.Body weight and bone properties as a function of chicken age. (A) Body weight, (B) tibia length, (C) tibia weight/body weight ratio, and (D) cortical bone thickness.
Figure 2.Images of cross-section of tibiae bone of broiler chickens of different ages as seen by optical microscopy and Masson's trichrome that stains newly formed bone tissue in red and mineralized bone in green. Tibiae bone at (A) 0 D, showing a large proportion of unmineralized bone organic matrix stained in red; (B) 3 , (C) 7 and (D) 10 D, and (E) 21 and (F) 37 D. Scale bar: 250 μm.
Figure 3.Images of cross-section of tibiae bone of a 37-day-old broiler chicken as seen by electron scanning microscopy (BSE-SEM). (A) Tibiae bone, (B) active periosteal area (AZ), and (C) dense cortical area (DZ). Scale bar: (A) 500 μm and (B and C) 100 μm.
Figure 4.Composition of cortical bone determined by FTIR. (A) Degree of mineralization (PO4/Amide I), (B) total amount of carbonate in bone mineral (MinCO3 1415), (C) degree of carbonate substitution in biomineral (MinCO3 870), and (D) cross-linking (LNK 1660/1690).
Figure 5.Composition of cortical bone determined by thermogravimetry and ICP-OES. (A) Degree of mineralization (PO4/OM), (B) total amount of carbonate in the mineral (MinCO3), and (C) Ca/P ratio in the mineral.
Multivariate linear regression model of bone mechanical properties and bone material properties.
| Max. Load (n = 50) | R2 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total bone ash | 0.490 | <0.001 |
| CT | 0.163 | 0.002 |
| CT+CDM | 0.197 | 0.002 |
| CT+CDM+I 211 | 0.238 | 0.001 |
| CT+CDM+I 211+I 002 | 0.292 | <0.001 |
| CT+CDM+I 211+I 002+AS | 0.326 | <0.001 |
AS, angular spread of crystal orientation in cortical bone; CDM, cortical bone degree of mineralization; CT, cortical bone thickness; I 002 and I 211 are the intensities of 002 and 211 apatite peaks.