Literature DB >> 31264966

The first cohort of prospective Fontan surgical planning patients with follow-up data: How accurate is surgical planning?

Phillip M Trusty1, Zhenglun Alan Wei1, Timothy C Slesnick2, Kirk R Kanter3, Thomas L Spray4, Mark A Fogel5, Ajit P Yoganathan6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Fontan surgical planning is an image-based, collaborative effort, which is hypothesized to result in improved patient outcomes. A common motivation for Fontan surgical planning is the progression (or concern for progression) of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of surgical planning predictions, specifically hepatic flow distribution (HFD), a known factor in pulmonary arteriovenous malformation progression, and identify methodological improvements needed to increase prediction accuracy.
METHODS: Twelve single-ventricle patients who were enrolled in a surgical planning protocol for Fontan surgery with pre- and postoperative cardiac imaging were included in this study. Computational fluid dynamics were used to compare HFD in the surgical planning prediction and actual postoperative conditions.
RESULTS: Overall, HFD prediction error was 17 ± 13%. This error was similar between surgery types (15 ± 18% and 18 ± 10% for revisions vs Fontan completions respectively; P = .73), but was significantly lower (6 ± 7%; P = .05) for hepatic to azygous shunts. Y-grafts and extracardiac conduits showed a strong correlation between prediction error and discrepancies in graft insertion points (r = 0.99; P < .001). Improving postoperative anatomy prediction significantly reduced overall HFD prediction error to 9 ± 6% (P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Although Fontan surgical planning can offer accurate HFD predictions for specific graft types, methodological improvements are needed to increase overall accuracy. Specifically, improving postoperative anatomy prediction was shown to be an important target for future work. Future efforts and refinements to the surgical planning process will benefit from an improved understanding of the current state and will rely heavily on increased follow-up data.
Copyright © 2018 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fontan; congenital heart defect; hepatic flow distribution; preprocedural planning; pulmonary arteriovenous malformations; surgical planning

Year:  2018        PMID: 31264966      PMCID: PMC6607917          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.11.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

1.  A Simplified In Silico Model of Left Ventricular Outflow in Patients After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with Anterior Leaflet Laceration.

Authors:  Keshav Kohli; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Vahid Sadri; Tiffany Netto; John C Lisko; Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis Babaliaros; John N Oshinski; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Role of surgeon intuition and computer-aided design in Fontan optimization: A computational fluid dynamics simulation study.

Authors:  Yue-Hin Loke; Byeol Kim; Paige Mass; Justin D Opfermann; Narutoshi Hibino; Axel Krieger; Laura Olivieri
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Computational Investigation of Anastomosis Options of a Right-Heart Pump to Patient Specific Pulmonary Arteries.

Authors:  Nicolas Tobin; Bryan C Good; Jonathan D Plasencia; Mark A Fogel; William J Weiss; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Comparison of Fontan Surgical Options for Patients with Apicocaval Juxtaposition.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Camille Johnson; Phillip Trusty; Morgan Stephens; Wenjun Wu; Ritchie Sharon; Balaji Srimurugan; Brijesh P Kottayil; G S Sunil; Mark A Fogel; Ajit P Yoganathan; Mahesh Kappanayil
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Fontan Circulation of the Next Generation: Why It's Necessary, What it Might Look Like.

Authors:  Shelby Kutty; Marshall L Jacobs; W Reid Thompson; David A Danford
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of an Intra-Atrial Fontan Connection.

Authors:  Elaine Tang; Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

8.  Semi-Automatic Planning and Three-Dimensional Electrospinning of Patient-Specific Grafts for Fontan Surgery.

Authors:  Xiaolong Liu; Byeol Kim; Yue-Hin Loke; Paige Mass; Laura Olivieri; Narutoshi Hibino; Mark Fuge; Axel Krieger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Engineering Perspective on Cardiovascular Simulations of Fontan Hemodynamics: Where Do We Stand with a Look Towards Clinical Application.

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.495

10.  Is Doppler Echocardiography Adequate for Surgical Planning of Single Ventricle Patients?

Authors:  Zhenglun Alan Wei; Biao Si; Xiaoqian Ge; Meng Zhu; Maria A Cetatoiu; Chenze Tian; Lixin Sun; Bin Qiao
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.495

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.