| Literature DB >> 31263499 |
Azeem Hussain Soomro1, Erum Khan2, Shafaq Noori3, Mohid Abrar Lone4, Zahid Syal2, Sabir Sheikh2.
Abstract
AIM: Cytokines and chemokines may be involved in the onset of oral ulcer in Behcet's disease. The aim of our study is to assess the cytotoxic effects of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines on reconstructed oral mucosal cell line (TR146) when treated with different concentrations of neutrophil elastase (NE).Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31263499 PMCID: PMC6556314 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6095628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Detection of IL-8 following the treatment of the OMM with NE after 24 hours of incubation.
| Parameters | NE 10 nM | NE 50 nM | NE 100 nM | NE 200 nM | Negative control (saline) | Positive control (SLS 1%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-8 (pg./ml) 24 hours of incubation | — | — | 2501.85d† ± 610.27 | 2540e† ± 360.27 | 2366.38 ± 164.08 | 6265.93 | ns/a† |
| IL-8 (pg./ml) 4 hours of incubation | 202.32 ± 45.16 | 257.43 ± 47.33 | 214.34 ± 30.35 | 231.83 ± 57.44 | 189.89 ± 37.12 | 63.98 ± 150.50 | ns/ns |
P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001. ns = nonsignificant, a/a† = compared with the negative control/compared with the positive control, b/b† = compared the negative control with 10 nM NE/compared the positive control with 10 nM NE, c/c† = compared the negative control with 50 nM NE/compared the positive control with 50 nM NE, d/d† = compared the negative control with 100 nM NE/compared the positive control with 100 nM NE, e/e† = compared the negative control with 200 nM NE/compared the positive control with 200 nM NE, g/g† = compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group), and i/i† = compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group).
Figure 1The graph depicting the concentration of IL-1β following the treatment of OMM samples with artificial saliva, 200 nM NE, 100 nM NE, and 0.01% SLS (P < 0.01, P < 0.001) for 24 hours.
Figure 2The graph depicts the concentration of IL-1β following the treatment of OMM samples with artificial saliva, 10 nM NE, 50 nM NE, 100 nM NE, 200 nM NE, and 0.01% SLS (P < 0.05, P < 0.01) after 4 hours.
Detection of IL-1β following the treatment of the OMM with NE after 24- and 4-hour incubation.
| Parameters | NE 10 nM | NE 50 nM | NE 100 nM | NE 200 nM | Negative control (saline) | Positive control (SLS 1%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-1 | — | — | 1.31d/d† ± 0.06 | 1.33e/e† ± 0.02 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 3.85 | a/a† |
| IL-1 | 46.02ns/b† ± 4.45 | 2.42ns/c† ± 0.23 | 2.42dgi/d†g†i† ± 0.21 | 1.92 e† ± 0.08 | 2.53 ± 0.25 | 46.05 | a/a† |
P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001. ns = nonsignificant, a/a† = compared with the negative control/compared with the positive control, b/b† = compared the negative control with 10 nM NE/compared the positive control with 10 nM NE, c/c† = compared the negative control with 50 nM NE/compared the positive control with 50 nM NE, d/d† = compared the negative control with 100 nM NE/compared the positive control with 100 nM NE, e/e† = compared the negative control with 200 nM NE/compared the positive control with 200 nM NE, g/g† = compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group), and i/i† = compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group).
Detection of TNF-α following the treatment of the OMM with NE after 24 hours of incubation.
| Parameters | NE 10 nM | NE 50 nM | NE 100 nM | NE 200 nM | Negative control (saline) | Positive control (SLS 1%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNF- | — | — | 14.76 ± 1.72 | 23.23 ± 3.71 | 22.26 ± 4.09 | 141.84 ± 51.66 | ns/ns |
| TNF- | 2.61 ± 1.43 | 25.00 ± 55.90 | 1.17 ± 0.50 | 4.36 ± 4.86 | 2.62 ± 1.64 | 15.29 | ns/ns |
P < 0.05; P < 0.01; P < 0.001. ns = nonsignificant, a/a† = compared with the negative control/compared the positive control, b/b† = compared the negative control with 10 nM NE/compared with the positive control with 10 nM NE, c/c† = compared the negative control with 50 nM NE/compared the positive control with 50 nM NE, d/d† = compared the negative control with 100 nM NE/compared the positive control with 100 nM NE, e/e† = compared the negative control with 200 nM NE/compared the positive control with 200 nM NE, g/g† = compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 10 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group), and i/i† = compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (negative control group)/compared 50 nM NE with 100 nM NE (positive control group).