Literature DB >> 31263289

Neurocomputational mechanisms underlying motivated seeing.

Yuan Chang Leong1, Brent L Hughes2, Yiyu Wang3, Jamil Zaki4.   

Abstract

People tend to believe that their perceptions are veridical representations of the world, but also commonly report perceiving what they want to see or hear. It remains unclear whether this reflects an actual change in what people perceive or merely a bias in their responding. Here we manipulated the percept that participants wanted to see as they performed a visual categorization task. Even though the reward-maximizing strategy was to perform the task accurately, the manipulation biased participants' perceptual judgements. Motivation increased neural activity selective for the motivationally relevant category, indicating a bias in participants' neural representation of the presented image. Using a drift diffusion model, we decomposed motivated seeing into response and perceptual components. Response bias was associated with anticipatory activity in the nucleus accumbens, whereas perceptual bias tracked category-selective neural activity. Our results provide a computational description of how the drive for reward leads to inaccurate representations of the world.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31263289     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0637-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  9 in total

1.  Learning from Ingroup Experiences Changes Intergroup Impressions.

Authors:  Yuqing Zhou; Björn Lindström; Alexander Soutschek; Pyungwon Kang; Philippe N Tobler; Grit Hein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content.

Authors:  Yuan Chang Leong; Janice Chen; Robb Willer; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Shared striatal activity in decisions to satisfy curiosity and hunger at the risk of electric shocks.

Authors:  Johnny King L Lau; Hiroki Ozono; Kei Kuratomi; Asuka Komiya; Kou Murayama
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-03-30

4.  Dynamic Representation of the Subjective Value of Information.

Authors:  Kenji Kobayashi; Sangil Lee; Alexandre L S Filipowicz; Kara D McGaughey; Joseph W Kable; Matthew R Nassar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Pupil-Linked Arousal Biases Evidence Accumulation Toward Desirable Percepts During Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Yuan Chang Leong; Roma Dziembaj; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-09-02

6.  A Generative View of Rationality and Growing Awareness.

Authors:  Teppo Felin; Jan Koenderink
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Olfactory perceptual decision-making is biased by motivational state.

Authors:  Laura K Shanahan; Surabhi Bhutani; Thorsten Kahnt
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Paranoia, self-deception and overconfidence.

Authors:  Rosa A Rossi-Goldthorpe; Yuan Chang Leong; Pantelis Leptourgos; Philip R Corlett
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Response Decoupling and Partisans' Evaluations of Politicians' Transgressions.

Authors:  Omer Yair; Brian F Schaffner
Journal:  Polit Behav       Date:  2022-05-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.