Literature DB >> 3126214

Coherence therapy does not prevent axial bone loss in osteoporotic women: a preliminary comparative study.

R Pacifici1, C McMurtry, I Vered, R Rupich, L V Avioli.   

Abstract

Coherence therapy, also known as ADFR (activate, depress, free, repeat) therapy, has been proposed as a new form of treatment for osteoporosis. We compared the effects of this therapy with those of gonadal steroid and calcium and of calcium alone in 93 osteoporotic women. Thirty women were treated for 1 yr with ADFR, in the form of K-phosphate (1.5 g/day), for 3 days followed by etidronate, (400 mg/day) for 14 days, followed by 8 weeks of neither drug, plus continuous calcium carbonate therapy (1 g/day). Thirty-six women received conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/day) for 25 days/month plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (10 mg/day) for 10 days/month and calcium, while 27 women received calcium carbonate (500 mg, twice daily). Sixteen women in the ADFR group, 15 in the calcium group, and 19 in the hormone-calcium group completed 2 yrs of treatment. Spinal bone mineral density was measured by single energy quantitative computerized tomography (QCT) and in the proximal and distal radius by single energy photon absorptiometry. The 3 groups were similar in age, initial bone mass, years since menopause, and dietary calcium intake. After 2 yrs, the mean women in the ADFR therapy group had a mean reduction of 8.0% in spinal QCT (P less than 0.05), and no change in proximal radius mineral content/bone width (BMC), and distal radius BMC. The group treated with calcium only had a decrease of 3.8% in QCT (P less than 0.05), of 5.6% in proximal BMC (P less than 0.05), and of 4.9% in distal BMC (P less than 0.05). The group treated with hormonal replacement and calcium had no change in any of their measurements. The relative bone loss in the spine at the end of the study was greater in the ADFR group than in the hormone-calcium group (P less than 0.05). Bone loss in the calcium group was slightly but not significantly greater than that in the hormone group and lower than that in the ADFR group. In conclusion, these preliminary results indicate that the ADFR regimen using phosphate and etidronate in doses of 1.5 g/day for 3 days and 400 mg/day for 14 days, respectively, is not as effective as hormonal replacement in preventing trabecular bone loss in osteoporosis, nor it is any more effective than calcium supplementation alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3126214     DOI: 10.1210/jcem-66-4-747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic drugs to prevent secondary fragility fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  T Saito; J M Sterbenz; S Malay; L Zhong; M P MacEachern; K C Chung
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Management of menopause when estrogen cannot be used.

Authors:  R L Young; N S Kumar; J W Goldzieher
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  The effect of a modified etidronate cyclical regimen on postmenopausal osteoporosis: a four-year study.

Authors:  G P Lyritis; N Tsakalakos; I Paspati; G Skarantavos; A Galanos; C Androulakis
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials.

Authors:  J M Cardona; E Pastor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Toward a cure for osteoporosis: reversal of excessive bone fragility.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Treatment of osteoporosis: current and future.

Authors:  M D Stone; D J Hosking
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 7.  Comparative clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use of bisphosphonates in metabolic bone diseases.

Authors:  C J Rosen; C R Kessenich
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  A practical guide to preventing osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Ettinger
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1988-12

Review 9.  New bisphosphonates in osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Fleisch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  The role of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  J Y Reginster
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.