| Literature DB >> 31261701 |
Nihal Yaman1,2, Serap Durakli Velioglu3.
Abstract
Pekmez, a traditional Turkish food generally produced by concentration of fruit juices, is subjected to fraudulent activities like many other foodstuffs. This study reports the use of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) in combination with chemometric methods for the detection of fraudulent addition of glucose syrup to traditional grape, carob and mulberry pekmez. FTIR spectra of samples were taken in mid-infrared (MIR) range of 400-4000 cm-1 using attenuated total reflectance (ATR) sample accessory. Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and PLS chemometric methods were built for qualitative and quantitative analysis of pekmez samples, respectively. PLS-DA models were successfully used for the discrimination of pure pekmez samples and the adulterated pekmez samples with glucose syrup. Sensitivity and specificity of 100%, and model efficiency of 100% were obtained in PLS-DA models for all pekmez groups. Detection of the adulteration ratio of pekmez samples was also accomplished using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy in combination with PLS. As a result, it was shown that ATR-FTIR spectroscopy along with chemometric methods had a great potential for determination of pekmez adulteration with glucose syrup.Entities:
Keywords: adulteration; attenuated total reflectance-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR); carob; grape; mulberry; pekmez
Year: 2019 PMID: 31261701 PMCID: PMC6678892 DOI: 10.3390/foods8070231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of representative grape (a), carob (b) and mulberry (c) pekmez samples.
Figure 2FTIR spectra of adulterated grape (a), carob (b) and mulberry (c) pekmez samples.
Figure 3Partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) models for pure and adulterated pekmez samples. (a) Grape pekmez, (b) carob pekmez, (c) mulberry pekmez.
PLS-DA classification parameters of grape, carob and mulberry pekmez samples.
| Parameters | Grape | Carob | Mulberry |
|---|---|---|---|
| RMSEC | 0.128 | 0.068 | 0.141 |
| RMSECV | 0.381 | 0.327 | 0.300 |
| STR (%) | 100 a,b | 100 a,b | 100 a,b |
| SPR (%) | 100 a,b | 100 a,b | 100 a,b |
| FPR (%) | 0 a,b | 0 a,b | 0 a,b |
| FNR (%) | 0 a,b | 0 a,b | 0 a,b |
| EFR (%) | 100 a,b | 100 a,b | 100 a,b |
a calibration; b validation; RMSECV, root mean squared error of cross-validation; RMSEC, root mean squared error of calibration; STR, Sensitivity rate; SPR, Specificity rate; FPR, False positive rate; FNR, False negative rate; EFR, Model efficiency rate; PLS-DA: Partial least squares-discriminant analysis.
R2 values of calibration and validation curves for grape, carob and mulberry pekmez samples.
| Pekmez Type | R2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Calibration | Validation | |
| Grape | 0.988 | 0.967 |
| Carob | 0.998 | 0.996 |
| Mulberry | 0.996 | 0.937 |
Figure 4Calibration and validation data curves for grape (a,b), carob (c,d) and mulberry (e,f) pekmez samples.
Parameters of PLS models of grape, carob and mulberry pekmez samples.
| Pekmez Type | LOD (%) | LOQ (%) | RMSEC | RMSECV | RMSEP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grape | 1.33 | 3.98 | 2.017 | 2.721 | 3.908 |
| Carob | 2.01 | 6.04 | 0.983 | 1.184 | 1.856 |
| Mulberry | 2.99 | 9.06 | 1.618 | 10.852 | 10.282 |
LOD: limit of detection value; LOQ: limit of quantification; RMSEP: root mean square error of prediction. PLS: Partial least squares.