Literature DB >> 31260837

The peripheral preview effect with faces: Combined EEG and eye-tracking suggests multiple stages of trans-saccadic predictive and non-predictive processing.

Christoph Huber-Huber1, Antimo Buonocore2, Olaf Dimigen3, Clayton Hickey4, David Melcher4.   

Abstract

The world appears stable despite saccadic eye-movements. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is that the visual system predicts upcoming input across saccadic eye-movements based on peripheral preview of the saccadic target. We tested this idea using concurrent electroencephalography (EEG) and eye-tracking. Participants made cued saccades to peripheral upright or inverted face stimuli that changed orientation (invalid preview) or maintained orientation (valid preview) while the saccade was completed. Experiment 1 demonstrated better discrimination performance and a reduced fixation-locked N170 component (fN170) with valid than with invalid preview, demonstrating integration of pre- and post-saccadic information. Moreover, the early fixation-related potentials (FRP) showed a preview face inversion effect suggesting that some pre-saccadic input was represented in the brain until around 170 ms post fixation-onset. Experiment 2 replicated Experiment 1 and manipulated the proportion of valid and invalid trials to test whether the preview effect reflects context-based prediction across trials. A whole-scalp Bayes factor analysis showed that this manipulation did not alter the fN170 preview effect but did influence the face inversion effect before the saccade. The pre-saccadic inversion effect declined earlier in the mostly invalid block than in the mostly valid block, which is consistent with the notion of pre-saccadic expectations. In addition, in both studies, we found strong evidence for an interaction between the pre-saccadic preview stimulus and the post-saccadic target as early as 50 ms (Experiment 2) or 90 ms (Experiment 1) into the new fixation. These findings suggest that visual stability may involve three temporal stages: prediction about the saccadic target, integration of pre-saccadic and post-saccadic information at around 50-90 ms post fixation onset, and post-saccadic facilitation of rapid categorization.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; Eye tracking; Fixation-related potentials (FRP); Prediction; Preview effect; Trans-saccadic perception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31260837     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  6 in total

1.  Fixation-related saccadic inhibition in free viewing in response to stimulus saliency.

Authors:  Oren Kadosh; Yoram S Bonneh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  A bias in saccadic suppression of shape change.

Authors:  Carolin Hübner; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The behavioural preview effect with faces is susceptible to statistical regularities: Evidence for predictive processing across the saccade.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; David Melcher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications.

Authors:  Olaf Dimigen; Benedikt V Ehinger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Low-Level Visual Information Is Maintained across Saccades, Allowing for a Postsaccadic Handoff between Visual Areas.

Authors:  Jasper H Fabius; Alessio Fracasso; David J Acunzo; Stefan Van der Stigchel; David Melcher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Prediction of complex stimuli across saccades.

Authors:  Corinna Osterbrink; Arvid Herwig
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.